Water Resources Management

, Volume 28, Issue 12, pp 4237–4255 | Cite as

Use of average data of 181 synoptic stations for estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration by temperature-based methods

Article

Abstract

Evapotranspiration has a highlighted role in agricultural and forest meteorology researches, hydrological cycle, irrigation scheduling, and water resources management. There are many models to estimate the evapotranspiration including mass transfer, radiation, temperature, and pan evaporation-based models. This study aims to compare temperature-based models to detect the best model under different weather conditions. For this purpose, weather data were gathered from 181 synoptic stations in 31 provinces of Iran. The evapotranspiration was estimated using 11 temperature-based models and was compared with the FAO Penman-Monteith model. The results showed that the Modified Hargreaves-Samani models estimate the evapotranspiration better than other models in the most provinces of Iran (25 provinces). However, the values of R2 were less than 0.98 for 15 provinces of Iran. Therefore, the models were calibrated and preciseness of estimation was increased. However, the estimation was improved only in 14 provinces. The new temperature-based models estimated the evapotranspiration in the eastern (RK, NK, SB, and KE) provinces of Iran (with a various temperature range 14–20 °C) better than other provinces. The best precise methods were the Modified Hargreaves-Samani 1 method for AL (before calibration) and the Modified Hargreaves-Samani 3 method for KE (after calibration). Finally, a list of the best performance of each model has been presented to use other regions and next researches according to values of mean, maximum, and minimum temperature, elevation, minimum and mean relative humidity, sunshine, precipitation, and wind speed. The results are also useful for selecting the best model when we must apply temperature-based models because of type of available data.

Keywords

Calibration Evapotranspiration FAO Penman Monteith Hargreaves Samani Iran Temperature 

References

  1. Abbaspour KC (1991) A comparison of different methods of estimating energy-limited evapotranspiration in the peace river region of British Columbia. Atmos Ocean 29(4):686–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acheampong PK (1986) Evaluation of potential evapotranspiration methods for Ghana. Geol J 12(4):409–415Google Scholar
  3. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Paper no. 56. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  4. Baier W (1971) Evaluation of latent evaporation estimates and their conversion to potential evaporation. Canad J Plant Sci 51:255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baier W, Robertson GW (1965) Estimation of latent evaporation from simple weather observations. Canad J Plant Sci 45:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basharat M, Tariq AR (2013) Spatial climate variability and its impact on irrigated hydrology in a canal command. Arab J Sci Eng 38(3):507–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhartiya KM, Ghare AD (2014) Relative humidity based model for estimation of reference evapotranspiration for western plateau and hills region of India. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0644-9 Google Scholar
  8. Blaney HF, Criddle WD (1950) Determining water requirements in irrigated areas from climatological and irrigation data. Soil conservation service technical paper 96, Soil conservation service. US Department of Agriculture, Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Bormann H (2011) Sensitivity analysis of 18 different potential evapotranspiration models to observed climatic change at German climate stations. Clim Chang 104(3–4):729–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Droogers P, Allen RG (2002) Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inprecise data conditions. Irrig Drain Syst 16:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Shafie A, Najah A, Alsulami HM, Jahanbani H (2014) Optimized neural network prediction model for potential evapotranspiration utilizing ensemble procedure. Water Resour Manag 28(4):947–967Google Scholar
  12. Hargreaves GL, Samani ZA (1985) Evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agr 1(2):96–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Irmak S, Irmak A, Allen R, Jones J (2003) Solar and Net Radiation-Based Equations to Estimate Reference Evapotranspiration in Humid Climates. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(5):336–347Google Scholar
  14. Jakimavicius D, Kriauciuniene J, Gailiusis B, Sarauskiene D (2013) Assessment of uncertainty in estimating the evaporation from the Curonian Lagoon. BALTICA 26(2):177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim S, Singh VP, Seo Y, Kim HS (2014) Modeling Nonlinear Monthly Evapotranspiration Using Soft Computing and Data Reconstruction Techniques. Water Resour Manag 28(1):185–206Google Scholar
  16. Kisi O, Cengiz TM (2013) Fuzzy genetic approach for estimating reference evapotranspiration of Turkey: Mediterranean region. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3541–3553Google Scholar
  17. McKenney MS, Rosenberg NJ (1993) Sensitivity of some potential evapotranspiration estimation methods to climate change. Agr Fores Meteorol 64(1):81–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohan S (1991) Intercomparison of evapotranspiration estimates. Hydrol Sci J 36(5):447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Papadavid G, Hadjimitsis DG, Toulios L, Michaelides S (2013) A modified SEBAL modeling approach for estimating crop evapotranspiration in semi-arid conditions. Water Resour Manag 27(9):3493–3506Google Scholar
  20. Perugu M, Singam AJ, Kamasani CSR (2013) Multiple linear correlation analysis of daily reference evapotranspiration. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1489–1500Google Scholar
  21. Pereira AR, Pruitt WO (2004) Adaptation of the Thornthwaite scheme for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration. Agr Water Manag 66(3):251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schendel U (1967) Vegetationswasserverbrauch und -wasserbedarf. Habilitation, Kiel, p 137Google Scholar
  23. Shadmani M, Marofi S, Roknian M (2012) Trend analysis in reference evapotranspiration using Mann-Kendall and Spearman’s Rho tests in arid regions of Iran. Water Resour Manag 26(1):211–224Google Scholar
  24. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trajkovic S (2007) Hargreaves versus Penman–Monteith under Humid Condition. J Irrig Drain Eng 133:38–42Google Scholar
  26. Valipour M (2012a) Ability of Box-Jenkins models to estimate of reference potential evapotranspiration (A Case Study: Mehrabad Synoptic Station, Tehran, Iran). IOSR J Agr Veter Sci (IOSR-JAVS) 1(5):1–11Google Scholar
  27. Valipour M (2012b) Critical areas of Iran for agriculture water management according to the annual rainfall. Eur J Sci Res 84(4):600–608Google Scholar
  28. Valipour M (2014a) Temperature analysis of reference evapotranspiration models. Meteorol Applicat. doi:10.1002/met.1465
  29. Valipour M (2014b) Drainage, waterlogging, and salinity. Arch Agron Soil Sci. doi:10.1080/03650340.2014.905676
  30. Valipour M (2014c) Future of the area equipped for irrigation. Arch Agron Soil Sci. doi:10.1080/03650340.2014.905675
  31. Valipour M (2014d) Importance of solar radiation, temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed for calculation of reference evapotranspiration. Arch Agron Soil Sci. doi:10.1080/03650340.2014.925107
  32. Valipour M (2014e) Land use policy and agricultural water management of the previous half of century in Africa. Appl Water Sci. doi:10.1007/s13201-014-0199-1
  33. Valipour M (2014f) Application of new mass transfer formulae for computation of evapotranspiration. J Appl Water Eng Res 2(1):33–46Google Scholar
  34. Valipour M (2014g) Future of agricultural water management in Americas. J Agr Res 52(2):245–268Google Scholar
  35. Valipour M (2014h) Handbook of water engineering problems. Foster city, CA: OMICS Group eBooks. www.esciencecentral.org/ebooks/handbook-of-water-engineering-problems/pdf/handbook-of-water-engineering-problems.pdf
  36. Valipour M (2014i) Future of agricultural water management in Europe based on socioeconomic indices. Acta Adv Agr Sci 2(7):1–18Google Scholar
  37. Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2012a) Monthly inflow forecasting using autoregressive artificial neural network. J Appl Sci 12(20):2139–2147Google Scholar
  38. Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2012b) Parameters estimate of autoregressive moving average and autoregressive integrated moving average models and compare their ability for inflow forecasting. J Math Stat 8(3):330–338Google Scholar
  39. Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2013) Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J Hydrol 476:433–441Google Scholar
  40. Valipour M, Montazar AA (2012a) Optimize of all effective infiltration parameters in furrow irrigation using visual basic and genetic algorithm programming. Austral J Basic Appl Sci 6(6):132–137Google Scholar
  41. Valipour M, Montazar AA (2012b) Sensitive analysis of optimized infiltration parameters in SWDC model. Adv Environ Biol 6(9):2574–2581Google Scholar
  42. Xu CY, Chen D (2005) Comparison of seven models for estimation of evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge using lysimeter measurement data in Germany. Hydrol Process 19:3717–3734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu CY, Singh VP (2000) Evaluation and generalization of radiation-based methods for calculating evaporation. Hydrol Process 14(2):339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu CY, Singh VP (2002) Cross comparison of empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland. Water Resour Manag 16(3):197–219Google Scholar
  45. Yoder RE, Odhiambo LO, Wright WC (2005) Evaluation of methods for estimating daily reference crop evapotranspiration at a site in the humid southeast United States. Appl Eng Agr 21(2):197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yuan W, Liu S, Liang S, Tan Z, Liu H, Young C (2012) Estimations of evapotranspiration and water balance with uncertainty over the Yukon River Basin. Water Resour Manag 26(8):2147–2157Google Scholar
  47. Zhai L, Feng Q, Li Q, Xu C (2010) Comparison and modification of equations for calculating evapotranspiration (ET) with data from Gansu Province, Northwest China. Irrig Drain 59:477–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Water Engineering, Kermanshah BranchIslamic Azad UniversityKermanshahIran

Personalised recommendations