Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Decision Making and Social Learning: the Case of Watershed Committee of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

  • 285 Accesses

  • 5 Citations

Abstract

Water is an essential element to life, and must be available to meet the basic needs of human beings. One of these needs is the production of food, emphasizing the relevance of agribusiness agents in the management of this natural resource. This study discusses how the management of water resources is being conducted by Committees of Watersheds in the State Rio Grande do Sul, focusing on decision making and in social learning. This is an exploratory study, supported by predominantly qualitative analysis. The results showed that the formation of the Committees of Watersheds in the State of Rio Grande do Sul depends on local decisions that are distinct in each region of the State. Evolution in the learning process of the members of the Committees occurs from the existence of conflicts. The conflicts emerge from issues concerning the use of water due to the multiple interests involved and provide discussions and solutions that lead to learning. Decisions taken in the Basin Committees are generally operating and relating to the quantity or quality of water. Social learning is promoted by actions of technical and relational nature offered by the exchange of knowledge and experience among stakeholders and other agents involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Akhbari M, Grigg NS (2013) A framework for an agent-based model to manage water resources conflicts. Water Resour Manag 27(11):4039–4052

  2. Araral E, Wang Y (2013) Water governance 2.0: a review and second generation research agenda. Water Resour Manag 27(11):3945–3957

  3. Assis AN (2011) Institutionalizing the concept of sustainability from a tetralogical perspective: the case of Pro-Guaíba. Organizações & Sociedade 18(57):335–353

  4. Berkes F, Seixas CS (2005) Building resilience in lagoon social–ecological systems: a local-level perspective. Ecosystems 8(8):967–974

  5. Blackmore C (2007) What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: a theoretical overview. Environ Sci Policy 10(6):512–525

  6. Braga B, Flecha R, Pena DS, Kelman J (2006) Água doces no Brasil. In: Rebouças AC, Braga BPF Jr, Tundisi JG, Tundisi JG (eds) A reforma institucional do setor dos recursos hídricos. Escrituras, São Paulo, pp 639–675

  7. Bruch C, Troell J (2011) Legalizing adaptation: water law in a changing climate. Water Int 36(7):828–845

  8. Chou FN-F, Lee H-C, Yeh WW-G (2013) Effectiveness and efficiency of scheduling regional water resources projects. Water Resour Manag 27(3):665–693

  9. Comitê Santa Maria (2006) Atas de Reuniões Ordinárias do Comitê Santa Maria realizadas de 1997 a 2005, http://www.comitesantamaria.com.br. Accessed 27 September 2006

  10. Corkal DR, Diaz H, Sauchyn D (2011) Changing roles in canadian water management: a case study of agriculture and water in Canada’s south saskatchewan river basin. Int J Water Resour Dev 27(4):647–664

  11. Denzin NK, Lincoln Y (2006) O planejamento da pesquisa qualitativa: teorias e abordagens. Artmed, Porto Alegre

  12. Egri CP, Pinfield LT (1999) As organizações e a biosfera: ecologia e meio ambiente. In: Glegg S, Hardy C, Nord WR (eds) Handbook de estudos organizacionais: modelos de análise e novas questões em estudos organizacionais vol 1. Atlas, São Paulo, pp 363–399

  13. Engle NL (2012) Adaptation Bridges and Barriers in Water Planning and Management: Insight from Recent Extreme Droughts in Arizona and Georgia. Journal of the American Water Resources Association

  14. Knüppe K (2011) The challenges facing sustainable and adaptive groundwater management in South Africa. Water SA 37(1):67–80

  15. Korfmacher KS (2001) The politics of participation in watershed modeling. Environ Manag 27(2):161–176

  16. Lin C-h, Huang T-h, Shaw D (2010) Applying water quality modeling to regulating land development in a watershed. Water Resour Manag 24(4):629–640

  17. Madruga LRRG, SILVA TN (2009) A expressão do empreendedorismo socioambiental na gestão de bacias hidrográficas. Rev de Gestão Soc e Ambient 3:v3i1

  18. Malhotra NK (2004) Pesquisa de Marketing: uma orientação aplicada. Bookman, Porto Alegre

  19. Marconi MA, Lakatos EM (2003) Fundamentos de metodologia científica. Atlas, São Paulo

  20. Mbonile MJ (2005) Migration and intensification of water conflicts in the Pangani Basin, Tanzania. Habitat Int 29(1):41–67

  21. MMA (2004) Recursos Hídricos: Conjunto de Normas Legais. Brasília.

  22. Moellenkamp S, Lamers M, Huesmann C, Rotter S, Pahl-Wostl C, Speil K, Pohl W (2010) Informal participatory platforms for adaptive management. Insights into niche-finding, collaborative design and outcomes from a participatory process in the rhine basin. Ecol Soc 15(4):41

  23. Muro M, Jeffrey P (2012) Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shapes stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecol Soc 17(1):3

  24. Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector - The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64(4):394–411

  25. Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P (2009) Resources management in transition. Ecol Soc 14(1):46

  26. Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Kastens B, Knieper C (2010) Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Pol 13(7):571–581

  27. Partnership GW (2006) Integrated water resources management, http://www.gwforum.org. Accessed 28 September 2006.

  28. Reitsma RF (1996) Structure and support of water-resources management and decision making. J Hydrol 177(3–4):253–268

  29. Rodrigues IC, Rodrigues AM, Rebelato MG, Alves FJC (2007) O gerenciamento das inter-relações da produção agrícola com o meio ambiente a partir das bacias hidrográficas: um ensaio compreensivo. Organizações Soc 14(40):63–80

  30. Santos E, Rossi R (2005) A regulação das águas. Organizações Soc 32–35:63

  31. Santos MA, Rodrigues R, Correia FN (1997) Technical communication: on the european water resources information policy. Water Resour Manag 11(4):305–322

  32. Schreider SY (2005) Integrative modelling for sustainable water allocation: editorial notes on the special issue. J Environ Manag 77(4):267–268

  33. SEMA (2006) Legislação. Available: www.sema.rs.gov.br/sema/html/lei_10350.htm Access: 15 Sep 2006

  34. Silva Filho JCL, Kuchler J, Nascimento LFM, Abreu M (2009) Gestão ambiental regional: usando o IAD framework de elinor ostrom na ’análise política’ da gestão ambiental da região metropolitana de porto alegre. Organizações Soc (impresso) 609–627:16

  35. Simon HA (1965) Comportamento administrativo: estudo dos processos decisórios nas organizações administrativas. Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro

  36. Steyaert P, Jiggins J (2007) Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environ Sci Pol 10(6):575–586

  37. Tippett J, Searle B, Pahl-Wostl C, Rees Y (2005) Social learning in public participation in river basin management—early findings from HarmoniCOP European case studies. Environ Sci Pol 8(3):287–299

  38. Van Der Wal M, De Kraker J, Offermans A, Kroeze C, Kirschner PA, van Ittersum M (2014) Measuring social learning in participatory approaches to natural resource Management. Environ Pol Gov 24(1):1–15

  39. Webler T, Tuler S, Shockey I, Stern P, Beattie R (2003) Participation by local governmental officials in watershed management planning. Soc Nat Resour 16(2):105–121

  40. Westley F, Olsson P, Folke C, Homer-Dixon T, Vredenburg H, Loorbach D, Thompson J, Nilsson M, Lambin E, Sendzimir J, Banerjee B, Galaz V, van der Leeuw S (2011) Tipping toward sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio 40(7):762–780

  41. Wittmer H, Rauschmayer F, Klauer B (2006) How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Use Policy 23(1):1–9

Download references

Funding

Brazil, Ministry of Education, Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

Author information

Correspondence to Melissa Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, M., da Rosa Gama Madruga, L.R., Yamaguchi, C.K. et al. Decision Making and Social Learning: the Case of Watershed Committee of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Water Resour Manage 28, 3815–3828 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0711-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Water resource
  • Social learning
  • Conflicts
  • Agribusiness