Water Resources Management

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 2109–2128

Improving Flood Forecasting in a Developing Country: A Comparative Study of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network

Article

Abstract

Due to limited data sources, practical situations in most developing countries favor black-box models in real time operations. In a simple and robust approach, this study examines performances of stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models, as tools for multi-step forecasting Chindwin River floods in northern Myanmar. Future river stages are modeled using past water levels and rainfall at the forecasting station as well as at the hydrologically connected upstream station. The developed models are calibrated with flood season data from 1990 to 2007 and validated with data from 2008 to 2011. Model performances are compared for 1- to 5-day ahead forecasts. With a high accuracy, both candidate models performed well for forecasting the full range of flood levels. The ANN models were superior to the SMLR models, particularly in predicting the extreme floods. Correlation analysis was found to be useful for determining the initial input variables. Contribution of upstream data to both models could improve the forecasting performance with higher R2 values and lower errors. Considering the commonly available data in the region as primary predictors, the results would be useful for real time flood forecasting, avoiding the complexity of physical processes.

Keywords

Artificial neural network Flood forecast Rainfall Real time operation Stepwise regression Water level 

References

  1. Abudu S, Cui C, King JP, Abudukadeer K (2010) Comparison of performance of statistical models in forecasting monthly streamflow of Kizil River, China. Water Sci Eng 3(3):269–281. doi:10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.03.003 Google Scholar
  2. Asati SR, Rathore SS (2012) Comparative study of stream flow prediction models. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharm Res 1(2):139–151Google Scholar
  3. ASCE Task Committee on application of artificial neural networks in Hydrology (2000a) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASCE Task Committee on application of artificial neural networks in Hydrology (2000b) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):124–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASE ASEAN Disaster Risk Management Initiative (2010) Synthesis report on ten ASEAN countries disaster risks assessment. World Bank, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction - Regional Office for Asia and Pacific (UNISDR AP), Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, the (GFDRR). http://www.unisdr.org/files/18872_asean.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2013
  6. Berz G (2000) Flood disasters: lessons from the past—worries for the future. Proceeding of the ICE. Water Marit Eng 142(1):3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bisht DCS, Raju MM, Joshi MC (2010) ANN based river stage-discharge modeling for Godavari River, India. Comput Model New Technol 14(3):48–62Google Scholar
  8. Chang F, Chiang Y, Chang L (2007) Multi-step-ahead neural networks for flood forecasting. Hydrol Sci 52(1):114–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cigizoglu HK (2003) Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of river flows by artificial neural networks. Hydrol Sci 48(3):349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corani G, Guariso G (2005) An Application of pruning in the design of neural networks for real time Flood Forecasting. Neural Comput Appl 14:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daud S, Shahzada K, Tufail M, Fahad M (2011) Stream flow modeling of River Swat using regressions and artificial neural networks (ANNs) techniques. Adv Mater Res 225–260:679–683. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson CW, Wilby RL (1999) A comparison of artificial neural networks used for river flow forecasting. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 3(4):529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawson CW, Wilby RL (2001) Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Prog Phys Geogr 25(1):80–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson CW, Harpham C, Wilby RL, Chen Y (2002) Evaluation of artificial neural network techniques for flow forecasting in the River Yangtze, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6(4):619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutta D, Herath S (2004) Trends of floods in Asia and flood risk management with integrated river basin approach. Proc Second Int Conf Asian-Pac Hydrol Water Resour Assoc Singap 1:55–63Google Scholar
  16. Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S (2012) Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for Non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab 10(2):486–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Had Haddad OB, Sharifi F, Alimohammadi S (2005) ANN in river flow forecasting. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Computing. Lisbon, Portugal: 316–324Google Scholar
  18. Haykin S (1994) Neural networks a comprehensive foundation. Macmillan College Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hels Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical Methods in Water Resources. Techniques of Water- Resources Investigations of the U. S Geological Survey Book 4, Hydrologic Analysis and Interpretation, Chapter A3Google Scholar
  20. Islam AS (2010) Improving flood forecasting in Bangladesh using an artificial neural network. IWA J Hydroinformatics 12(3):351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kisi Ö (2007) Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. J Hydrol Eng 12(5):532–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizan A (1998) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 3rd edn. Duxbury Press, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  23. Magar RB, Jothiprakash V (2011) Intermittent reservoir daily-inflow prediction using lumped and distributed data multi-liner regression models. J Earth Syst Sci 120(6):1067–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Minns AW, Hall MJ (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci 41(3):399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Othman F, Naseri M (2011) Reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural work. Int J Phys Sci 6(3):434–440Google Scholar
  26. Rajurkar MP, Kothyari UC, Chaube UC (2002) Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrol Sci 47(6):865–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rezaeianzadeh M et al (2013) Flood flow forecasting using ANN. ANFIS and regression models. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-013-1443-6 Google Scholar
  28. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Parallel distributed processing, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 318–362Google Scholar
  29. Sajikumar N, Thandaveswara BS (1999) A non-linear rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network. J Hydrol 216:32–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanyal J, Lu XX (2004) Application of remote sensing in flood management with special reference to monsoon Asia: a review. Nat Hazards 33:283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sattari NT, Apaydin H, Ozturk F (2012) Flow estimations for the Sohu stream using artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 66(7):2031–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sentu D, Regulwar DG (2011) Inflow prediction by different neural network architectures: a case study. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4(6):225–230Google Scholar
  33. Shamseldin AY (2010) Artificial neural network model for river flow forecasting in a developing country. IWA J Hydroinformatics 12(1):22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tareghian R, Kashefipour SM (2007) Application of fuzzy systems and artificial neural networks for flood forecasting. J Appl Sci 7(22):3451–3459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thirumalaiah K, Deo MC (1998) Real-time flood forecasting using neural networks. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 13:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang W (2006) Stochasticity, nonlinearity and forecasting of streamflow processes. Ios Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu CL, Chau KW, Li YS (2008) River stage prediction based on a distributed support vector regression. J Hydrol 358:96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Sustainability, Institute of EcologyLeuphana University of LueneburgLueneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations