Water Resources Management

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 933–946 | Cite as

Hydrology of the Jordan River Basin: A GIS-Based System to Better Guide Water Resources Management and Decision Making

  • Georges F. Comair
  • Daene C. McKinney
  • David R. Maidment
  • Gonzalo Espinoza
  • Harish Sangiredy
  • Abbas Fayad
  • Fernando R. Salas
Article

Abstract

A new method of participatory decision support that can be used in transboundary basins is presented. The framework of this method relies first on the creation of a transboundary geographic information system database to store hydrologic data and allow easy access to data from stakeholders. A participatory hydro-political framework is developed to help set up hydrologic models and evaluate joint water management scenarios. Results show that the countries of the Jordan River could benefit from the framework and in the case of southern Lebanon, six climate stations should be replaced or reactivated. Finally, the mechanism of a Lebanese Hydrologic Information System is presented and shows that an observation data model will facilitate science and policy integration.

Keywords

Jordan River Transboundary basins Database Decision support system GIS Water diplomacy 

References

  1. Ahmad S, Simonovic S (2006) An intelligent decision support system for management of floods. Water Resour Manag 20:391–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Qudah K, Abu-Jaber N (2009) A GIS database for sustainable management of shallow water resources in the Tulul al Ashaqif Region, NE Jordan. Water Resour Manag 23:603–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awad M, Khawlie M, Darwich T (2009) Web based meta-database and its role in improving water resources management in the Mediterranean basin. Water Resour Manag 23:2669–2680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrow C (1998) River basin development planning and management: A critical review. World Dev 26(1):171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Comair G, McKinney D, Scoullos M, Flinker R, Espinoza G (2013) Transboundary cooperation in international basins: Clarification and experiences from the Orontes river basin agreement, part 1. Environmental Science and Policy 31:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comair G, McKinney D, Siegel D (2012a) Hydrology of the Jordan River basin: Watershed delineation, precipitation and evapotranspiration. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4281–4293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comair G, Gupta P, Ingenloff C, Shin G, McKinney D (2012b) Water resources management in the Jordan River basin. Water and Envir Journal 27:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CUAHSI (2013) Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science, Inc. http://www.cuahsi.org/Accessed July 15 2013
  9. Espinoza G (2012) A Mexican Case Study for World Water Online. CRWR Online Report 2012–01. http://www.crwr.utexas.edu/reports/2012/rpt12-1.shtml. Accessed July 15 2013
  10. Fisher FM, Arlosoroff S, Eckstein Z, Haddadin M, Hamati SG, Huber-Lee A, Jarrar A, Jayyousi A, Shamir U, Wesseling H (2002) Optimal water management and conflict resolution: The Middle East water project. Water Resour Res 38(11):1243Google Scholar
  11. GEOSS (2013) Group On Earth Observations GEOSS Water Services for Societal Benefit.http://www.ogcnetwork.net/system/files/AIP6_GEOSS_Water_Services_Proposal_final.pdf Accessed July 15 2013
  12. Geurts J, Joldersma C (2001) Methodology for participatory policy analysis. Eur J Oper Res 128:300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodall J, Maidment D (2005) A Geotemporal Framework for Hydrologic Analysis. CRWR Online Report 05–8. http://www.crwr.utexas.edu/reports/pdf/2005/rtp05-08.pdf. Accessed July 15 2013
  14. Goulter I, Forrest D (1987) Use of geographical information-systems (GIS) in river basin management. Water Science and Technology 19(9):81–86Google Scholar
  15. Gunkel A, Lange L (2011) New insights into the natural variability of water resources in the lower Jordan River Basin. Water Resour Manag 25:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harza, JRV Group (1998) Jordan Rift valley integrated development study. Red-Sea-Dead Sea canal project. Prefeasibility Report. Volume 1-Main Report.Google Scholar
  17. Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Holberg AL, Ferr N, Gigsbeer P, Scholten H (2009) Harmonised principles for public participation in quality assurance of integrated water resources modelling. Water Resour Manag 23:2539–2554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoff H (2011) A water resources planning tool for the Jordan River Basin. Water 3:718–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holling C (1978) Adaptive environmental planning and management. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. Horsburgh JS, Tarboton DG, Maidment DR, Zaslavsky I (2008) A relational model for environmental and water resources data. Water Resour Res 44(W05406)Google Scholar
  21. ILA - International Law Association (1966) The Helsinki rules on the uses of the waters of international rivers. Adopted by the International Law Association at the 52nd Conf, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  22. Janssen W, Goldworthy P (1996) Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: Conceptual practical implications. Agric syst 51:259–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jha M, Chowdhury A, Chowdary VM, Peiffer S (2007) Groundwater management and development by integrated remote sensing and geographic information systems: Prospects and constraints. Water Resour Manage 21:427–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khadra R, Lamaddalena N (2010) Development of a decision support system for irrigation systems analysis. Water Resour Manage 24:3279–3297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein M (1998) Water balance of the upper Jordan River basin. Water Int 23(4):244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maidment DR (2002) Arc hydro: GIS for water resources. ESRI Press, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  27. Maidment DR (2004) Creating hydrologic information systems. www.utexas.edu/. Accessed January 15, 2004.
  28. Maidment DR (2005) A data model for hydrologic observations. CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System Symposium, Austin, p 23Google Scholar
  29. Mithen SJ, Black E (2011) Water, life and civilisation: Climate, environment and society in the Jordan Valley. Cambridge UP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Molina JL, García-Aróstegui JL, Bromley J, Benavente J (2011) Integrated assessment of the EuropeanWFD implementation in extremely overexploited aquifers through participatory modelling. Water Resour Manag 23:2737–2760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan MG, Dowlatabadi H (1996) Learning from integrated assessment of climate change. Clim Chang 34:337–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2):179–197Google Scholar
  33. Nikolic V, Imonovic S, Milicevic D (2013) Analytical support for integrated water resources management: A New method for addressing spatial and temporal variability. Water Resour Manag 27:401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park J, Seaton RAF (1996) Integrative research sustainable agriculture. Agric Syst 50:81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker P, Letcher R, Jakeman AJ (2002) Progress in integrated assessment modelling. Environ Modell Softw 17:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pollard S, Toit D (2011) Towards adaptive integrated water resources management in southern africa: The role of self-organisation and multi-scale feedbacks for learning and responsiveness in the letaba and crocodile catchments. Water Resour Manag 25:4019–4035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prodanovic P, Simonovic S (2010) An operational model for support of integrated watershed management. Water Resour Manag 24:1161–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Risbey J, Klikar MA, Patwardhan A (1996) Assessing integrated assessments. Clim Change 34:369–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rothman DS, Robinson JB (1997) Growing pains: A conceptual framework for considering integrated assessments. Environ Monit Assess 46:23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rotmans J, Van Asselt M (1996) Integrated assessment: Growing child on its way to maturity. An editorial essay. Clim Chang 34:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tarboton D, Maidment D, Zaslavsky I, Ames D, Goodall J, Hooper P, Horsburgh J, Valentine D, Whiteaker T, Schreuders K (2011) Data Interoperability in the Hydrologic Sciences, The CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System. Proceedings of the Environmental Information Management Conference 2011, 132–137, http://eim.ecoinformatics.org/eim2011/eim-proceedings-2011/view. Accessed July 15 2013
  43. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 1992. http://rod.eionet.europa.eu/instruments/184. Accessed July 15 2013
  44. Winz I, Brierley G, Trowsdale S (2009) The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management. Water Resour Manag 23:1301–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey DR, Huber-Lee A (2005) WEAP21-A demand, priority, and preference driven water planning model: Part 1, model characteristics. Water International 30:487–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georges F. Comair
    • 1
  • Daene C. McKinney
    • 1
  • David R. Maidment
    • 1
  • Gonzalo Espinoza
    • 1
  • Harish Sangiredy
    • 1
  • Abbas Fayad
    • 2
  • Fernando R. Salas
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Research in Water ResourcesUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAmerican University of BeirutRiad El-SolhLebanon

Personalised recommendations