Water Resources Management

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 807–817

Local and Regional Water Flow Quantification in Groundwater-dependent Wetlands



Runoff, groundwater recharge and discharge, and surface water–groundwater interaction are the main driving forces of wetlands. The quantification of such flows is crucial information in the restoration and management of groundwater-dependent wetlands. The objective of this work is to quantify groundwater inflow at the level of the hydrogeological basin, which discharges into the wetland in the coastal plain of the Río de la Plata (Argentina). It also aims at evaluating whether such inflow is affected by groundwater exploitation in the high plain adjacent to the wetland. On the basis of water level data, a model of hydrological behaviour was developed and then a numerical simulation to quantify groundwater inflow was carried out. The evolution of groundwater levels was analyzed considering three situations: one of them in natural conditions and two others under different groundwater exploitation conditions. In the first case, the inflow originates in the recharge from precipitation, in the local groundwater discharge from the adjacent high plain and in the regional one from the semi-confined aquifer. The exploitation of the semi-confined aquifer in the high plain causes the formation of a cone of depression which modifies the hydrodynamics of the wetland in the area adjacent to the extraction wells. The quantification of flows shows that groundwater exploitation in areas of the basin located out of the wetland may cause the volume of water flowing into the wetland through groundwater discharge to decrease by approximately 25 %. The importance of considering discharge wetlands as part of regional hydrogeological systems should be highlighted, mainly as regards the management of natural resources.


Wetland Groundwater flow Water balance Numerical simulation Hydrogeological system 


  1. Acha M, Mianzan H, Guerrero R, Carreto J, Giberto D, Montoya N, Carignan M (2008) An overview of physical and ecological processes in the Río de la Plata Estuary. Cont Shelf Res 28:1579–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artaza E (1943) Saneamiento urbano en la República Argentina. Provisión de agua. Fac. de Cs. Físicomatemáticas. Cuaderno Nº 6. La PlataGoogle Scholar
  3. Boswell JS, Olyphant GA (2007) Modeling the hydrologic response of groundwater dominated wetlands to transient boundary conditions: implications for wetland restoration. J Hydrol 332:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook PG, Wood C, White T, Simmons CT, Fass T, Brunner P (2008) Groundwater inflow to a shallow, poorly-mixed wetlands estimated from a mass balance of radon. J Hydrol 354:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Custodio E (2010) Aguas subterráneas y humedales en zonas llanas. I Congreso Internacional de Hidrología de Llanuras, 39–49Google Scholar
  6. Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model—User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00–92, p. 121Google Scholar
  7. Hunt RJ, Krabbenhoft DP, Anderson MP (1996) Groundwater inflow measurements in wetland systems. Water Resour Res 32:495–507. doi:10.1029/95WR03724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krause S, Heathwaite AL, Miller F, Hulme P, Crowe A (2007) Groundwater-dependent wetlands in the UK and Ireland: controls, functioning and assessing the likelihood of damage from human activities. Water Resour Manage 21:2015–2025. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9192-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kruse E, Varela L, Laurencena P, Deluchi M, Rojo A, Carol E (2004) Modificaciones del ciclo Hidrológico en un Area del Noreste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Serie Hidrogeología y Aguas Subterráneas: 11 (131–139). Instituto Geológico Minero de España. ISBN 84-7840-539-9. MadridGoogle Scholar
  10. Logan W, Rudolph D (1997) Microdepressión-focused recharge in a coastal wetland, La Plata, Argentina. J Hydrol 194:221–238Google Scholar
  11. Logan W, Auge M, Panarello H (1999) Bicarbonate, sulfate and chloride water in a shallow, clastic-dominated coastal flow system, Argentina. Ground Water 37:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roets W, Xu X, Raitt L, El-Kahloun M, Meire P, Calitz F, Batelaan O, Anibas C, Paridaens K, Vandenbroucke T, Verhoest N, Brendonck L (2008) Hydrobiologia 607:175–186. doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9389-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tóth J (1995) Hydraulic continuity in large sedimentary basins. Hydrogeol J 3:4–16. doi:10.1007/s100400050250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang M, Qin D, Lu C, Li Y (2010) Modeling anthropogenic impacts and hydrological processes on a wetland in China. Water Resour Manage 24:2743–2757. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9577-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y MuseoUniversidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)La PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil (LNEC)LisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations