Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Energy Production in Water Distribution Networks: A PAT Design Strategy

  • 1091 Accesses

  • 96 Citations

Abstract

Pump operating as turbine (PAT) is an effective source of reducing the equipment cost in small hydropower plants. However, the manufacturers provide poor information on the PAT performance thus representing a limit for its wider diffusion. Additional implementation difficulties arise under variable operating conditions, characteristic of water distribution networks (WDNs). WDNs allow to obtain widespread and globally significant amount of produced energy by exploiting the head drop due to the network pressure control strategy for leak reductions. Thus a design procedure is proposed that couples a parallel hydraulic circuit with an overall plant efficiency criteria for the market pump selection within a WDN. The proposed design method allows to identify the performance curves of the PAT that maximizes the produced energy for an assigned flow and pressure-head distribution pattern. Finally, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is shown as a suitable alternative for performance curve assessment covering the limited number of experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Afshar A, Jemaa F, Marino M (1990) Optimization of hydropower plant integration in water supply system. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 116(5):665–675

  2. Alatorre-Frenk C, Thomas T (1990) The pumps as turbines approach to small hydropower. In: World congress on renewable energy, Reading

  3. Almandoz J, Cabrera E, Arregui F, Cabrera E, Cobacho R (2005) Leakage assessment through water distribution network simulation. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 131(6):458–466

  4. Araujo L, Ramos H, Coelho S (2006) Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management. Water Resour Manage 20(1):133–149

  5. Arriaga M (2010) Pump as turbine—a pico-hydro alternative in Lao people’s democratic republic. Renew Energy 35:1109–1115

  6. Carravetta A, Giugni M (2009) Functionality factors in the management and rehabilitation of water networks. In: Management of water networks, proc conf efficient management of water networks. Design and Rehabilitation Techniques, Franco Angeli Ed. Milano

  7. Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Ramos H (2011) Numerical simulation on pump as turbine: mesh reliability and performance concerns. In: IEEE (ed) international conference on clean electrical power. Ischia, Franco Angeli Ed. Milano

  8. Chapallaz J, Eichenberger P, Fischer G (1992) Manual on pumps used as turbines. DeutschesZentru fur Entwicklungstechnologien, GATE, Eschborn

  9. Childs S (1962) Convert pumps to turbines and recover HP. Hydrocarbon Processing and Petroleum Refiner 41(10):173–174

  10. Derakhshan S, Nourbakhsh A (2008a) Experimental study of characteristic curves of centrifugal pumps working as turbines in different specific speeds. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 32:800–807

  11. Fecarotta O, Carravetta A, Ramos H (2011) CFD and comparisons for a pump as turbine: mesh reliability and performance concerns. Int J Energy Environ 2(1):39–48

  12. Fernandez J, Blanco E, Parrondo J, Stickland M, Scanlon T (2004) Performance of a centrifugal pump running in inverse mode. Proc Inst Mech Eng A J power energy 218(4):265–271

  13. Filion Y, MacLean H, Karney B (2004) Life cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system. J Infrastruct Syst 10(3):120–130

  14. Fontana N, Giugni M, Portolano D (2012) Losses reduction and energy production in water-distribution networks. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 138(3):237–244

  15. Gantar M (1988) Propeller, pump running as turbines. In: Conference on hydraulic machinery

  16. Gonçalves F, Costa L, Ramos H (2011) ANN for hybrid energy system evaluation: methodology and WSS case study. Water Resour Manage 25:2295–2317

  17. Grover K (1980) Conversion of pumps to turbines. In: GSA Inter corp. Katonah, New York

  18. Hanckock J (1963) Centrifugal pump or water turbine. Pipe Line News, 25–27

  19. Karadirek I, Kara S, Yilmaz G, Muhammetoglu A, Muhammetoglu H (2011) Implementation of hydraulic modelling for water-loss reduction through pressure management. Water Resour Manage. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0032-2

  20. Kerschberger P, Gehrer A (2010) Hydraulic development of high specific-speed Pump-turbines by means of an inverse design method, numerical flowsimulation (CFD) and model testing. In: 25th IAHR symposium on hydraulic machinery and systems. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol 12

  21. Liberatore s, Sechi G (2009) Location and calibration of valves in water distribution networks using a scatter-search meta-heuristic approach. Water Resour Manage 23:1479–1495

  22. Natanasabapathi S, Kshirsagar J (2004) Pump as turbine: an experience with CFX-5.6. In: Corporate research and engineering division. Pune, India, Kirloskar Bros. Ltd

  23. Nautiyal H, Varun, Kumar A (2010a) CFD analysis on pumps working as turbines. Hydro Nepal, vol 6, 35–37

  24. Nautiyal H, Varun, Kumar A (2010b) Reverse running pumps analytical, experimental and computational study: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2059–2067

  25. Nazif S, Karamouz M, Tabesh M, Moridi A (2011) Pressure management model for urban water distribution networks. Water Resour Manage 24:437–458

  26. Prescott S, Ulanicki B (2008) Improved control of pressure reducing valves in water distribution networks. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 134(1):56–65

  27. Ramos H, Almeida A (2001) Dynamic orifice model on waterhammer analysis of high or medium heads of small hydropower plants. J Hydraul Res 39(4):429–436

  28. Ramos H, Almeida A (2002) Parametric analysis of water-hammer effects in small hydro schemes. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 128(7):1–8

  29. Ramos H (2000) Guidelines for design of small hydropower plants. WREAN and DED, Belfast, North Ireland

  30. Ramos H, Covas D, Araujo L, Mello M (2005) Available energy assessment in water supply systems. In: XXXI IAHR congress. Seoul, Korea

  31. Ramos H, Mello M, De P (2010) Clean power in water supply systems as a sustainable solution: from planning to practical implementation. Water Sci Technol 10(1):39–49

  32. Rodrigues A, Singh P, Williams A, Nestmann F, Lai E (2003) Hydraulic analysis of a pump as a turbine with CFD and experimental data. In: IMechE seminar computational fluid dynamics for fluid machinery

  33. Schmiedl E (1988) Serien-Kreiselpumpentagung. Karlsruhe

  34. Sharma K (1985) Small hydroelectric projects—use of centrifugal pumps as turbines. In: Kirloskar Electric o. Bangalore, India

  35. Singh P, Nestmann F (2010) An optimization routine on a prediction and selection model for the turbine operation of centrifugal pumps. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 34(2):152–164

  36. Stepanoff A (1957) Centrifugal and axial flow pumps. John Wiley, New York

  37. Suter P (1966) Representation of pump characteristics for calculation of water hammer. Sulzer Tech Rev 4:45–48

  38. Tucciarelli T, Criminisi A, Termini D (1999) Leak analysis in pipeline systems by means of optimal valve regulation. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 125(3):277–285

  39. Vairavamoorthy K, Lumbers J (1998) Leakage reduction in water distribution systems: optimal valve control. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 124(11):1146–1154

  40. Walsky T, Bezts W, Posluzny E, Weir M, Withman B (2006) Modeling leakage reduction through pressure control. J Am Water Works Ass, pp 148–155

  41. Williams A (1994) The turbine performance of centrifugal pumps: a comparison of predictione methods. Proc Inst Mech Eng A J power energy 208(1):59–66

  42. Wylie E, Streeter V and Suo L (1993) Fluid transient in systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 7632

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Caprari s.p.a. and Eng. Lauro Antipodi for having provided both the experimental performance curves and the 3D-geometry of the two machines.

Author information

Correspondence to Oreste Fecarotta.

Appendix

Appendix

In 1966 Suter introduced two parameters (see also Wylie et al. 1993):

$$ WH = \frac{h}{q^2(\theta^2+1)}; \ \ \ WT = \frac{t}{q^2(\theta^2+1)}; \ \ \ $$
(4)

where

$$ \theta = \frac{\omega}{q} $$
(5)

represents the operating condition of the machine and

$$ h = \frac{H^T}{H_B^T}, \ \omega = \frac{N^T}{N_B^T}, \ q = \frac{Q^T}{Q_B^T}, \ t = \frac{T^T}{T_B^T}, \ $$
(6)

Being T the torque applied to the runner. The two functions WH(θ) and WT(θ) are unique for similar machines. Thus, once they are available for a prototype machine, they can be used to calculate the head drop H T and the efficiency η T of similar PATs in any operating condition θ

$$ H^T=\left[ q^2(\theta^2+1)WH \right] H_B^T, \ \ \ \eta^T=\theta\frac{WT}{WH}\eta_B^T $$
(7)

where \(\eta_B^T\) is the efficiency of the machine at the BEP. In Fig. 9 the Suter parameters of the machines A and B are shown for the turbine operating mode.

Fig. 9
figure9

Suter parameters of the two machines

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carravetta, A., Del Giudice, G., Fecarotta, O. et al. Energy Production in Water Distribution Networks: A PAT Design Strategy. Water Resour Manage 26, 3947–3959 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0114-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pump as Turbine (PAT)
  • Water Distribution Networks (WDNs)
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
  • Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV)
  • Leak reduction