Water Resources Management

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 2867–2881 | Cite as

An Evaluation of Four Reference Evapotranspiration Models in a Subtropical Climate

  • Ali Rahimikhoob
  • Mahmood Reza Behbahani
  • Javad Fakheri
Article

Abstract

This paper describes a detailed evaluation of the performance and characteristic behaviour of four equations for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET0) at eight meteorological sites in a subtropical climate. The equations assessed were: Makkink (MK), Turc (TC), Priestley–Taylor (PT) and Hargreaves (HG). The sites were distributed throughout the north of Iran and represent an intermediate humidity regime. The Penman–Monteith (PM) method was chosen as the standard for comparison and calibration of the above—mentioned four equations. Good correlation was found between the ET0 values estimated by each of the four empirical equations and the PM method for all the locations; however MK and TC equations produced considerable underestimations. The performance of the PT and HG equations improved slightly after region-specific coefficients were developed for each equation, and the TC and MK equations were improved greatly. The modified PT equation turned out to be the most precise method, demonstrating superiority over the other methods evaluated (0.48 mm d−1 of root mean square error (RMSE)). Good performance from the modified HG equation (0.53 mm d−1 of RMSE) must be emphasized, given the simplicity of that method, which only requires maximum and minimum air temperature data.

Keywords

Reference evapotranspiration ET0 equations Estimation Subtropical climate Iran 

References

  1. Allen RG (1996) Assessing integrity of weather data for reference evapotranspiration estimation. J Irrig Drain Eng 122(2):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen RG (2003) REF-ET user’s guide. University of Idaho Kimberly Research Stations, KimberlyGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. In: FAO irrigation and drainage paper, no 56. FAO, Roma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  4. Amatya DM, Skaggs RW, Gregory JD (1995) Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET. J Irrig Drain Eng 121(6):427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Stefano C, Ferro V (1997) Estimation of evapotranspiration by Hargreaves formula and remote sensed data in semi-arid Mediterranean areas. J Agric Eng Res 68(3):189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Douglas EM, Jacobs JM, Sumner DM, Ray RL (2009) A comparison of models for estimating potential evapotranspiration for Florida land cover types. J Hydrol 373:366–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Droogers P, Allen RG (2002) Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrig Drain Syst 16:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hargreaves GH, Allen RG (2003) History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(1):53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1(2):96–99Google Scholar
  10. Hargreaves LG, Hargreaves GH, Riley JP (1985) Irrigation water requirements for Senegal river basin. J Irrig Drain Eng 111(3):265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Irmak S, Allen RG, Whitty EB (2003) Daily grass and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration estimates and alfalfa-to-grass evapotranspiration ratios in Florida. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(5):360–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. In: ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice, no 70. ASCE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosarev AN, Yablonskaya EA (1994) The Caspian Sea. SPB Academic Publishing, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  14. Landeras G, Ortiz-Barredo A, López JJ (2008) Comparison of artificial neural network models and empirical and semi-empirical equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). Agric Water Manag 95(5):553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Makkink GF (1957) Testing the Penman formula by means of lysimeters. J Inst Water Eng 11(3):277–288Google Scholar
  16. Meyer SJ, Hubbard KG, Wilhite DA (1989) Estimating potential evapotranspiration: the effect of random and systematic errors. Agric For Meteorol 46:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond 193:120–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rivington M, Bellocchi G, Matthews KB, Buchan K (2005) Evaluation of three model estimations of solar radiation at 24 UK stations. Agric For Meteorol 132:228–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodionov SN (1994) Global and regional climate interaction: the Caspian Sea experience. Water science and technology library. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Suleiman AA, Hoogenboom G (2007) Comparison of Priestley-Taylor and FAO-56 Penman–Monteith for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in Georgia. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(2):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tabari H (2010) Evaluation of reference crop evapotranspiration equations in various climates. Water Resour Manag 24:2311–2337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trajkovic S, Kolakovic S (2009) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equations under humid conditions. Water Resour Manag 23:3057–3067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Turc L (1961) Estimation of irrigation water requirements, potential evapotranspiration: a simple climatic formula evolved up to date. Ann Agron 12:13–49 (in French)Google Scholar
  25. Utset A, Farre I, Martinez-Cob A, Cavero J (2004) Comparing Penman–Monteith and Priestley–Taylor approaches as referenceevapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Water Manag 66(3):205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vanderlinden K, Giraldez JV, Van Meirvenne M (2004) Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in southern Spain. J Irrig Drain Eng 130(3):184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Rahimikhoob
    • 1
  • Mahmood Reza Behbahani
    • 1
  • Javad Fakheri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Aburaihan CampusUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations