Water Resources Management

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 2761–2779 | Cite as

Hydro-Climatological Drought Analyses and Projections Using Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Indices: A Case Study in Blue River Basin, Oklahoma

  • Lu Liu
  • Yang Hong
  • Christopher N. Bednarczyk
  • Bin Yong
  • Mark A. Shafer
  • Rachel Riley
  • James E. Hocker
Article

Abstract

Understanding the characteristics of historical droughts will benefit water resource managers because it will reveal the possible impacts that future changes in climate may have on drought, and subsequently, the availability of water resources. The goal of this study was to reconstruct historical drought occurrences and assess future drought risk for the drought-prone Blue River Basin in Oklahoma, under a likely changing climate using three types of drought indices, i.e., Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and Standardized Runoff Index (SRI). No similar research has been conducted in this region previously. Monthly precipitation and temperature data from the observational period 1950–1999 and over the projection period 2010–2099 from 16 statistically downscaled Global Climate Models (GCM) were used to compute the duration, severity, and extent of meteorological droughts. Additionally, soil moisture, evapotranspiration (ET), and runoff data from the well-calibrated Thornthwaite Monthly Water Balance Model were used to examine drought from a hydrological perspective. The results show that the three indices captured the historical droughts for the past 50 years and suggest that more severe droughts of wider extent are very likely to occur over the next 90 years in the Blue River Basin, especially in the later part of the 21st century. In fact, all three indices display lower minimum values than those ever recorded in the past 50 years. This study also found that SRI and SPI (PDSI) had a correlation coefficient of 0.81 (0.78) with a 2-month (no appreciable) lag time over the 1950–2099 time period across the basin. There was relatively lower correlation between SPI and PDSI over the same period. Although this study recommends that PDSI and SRI are the most suitable indices for assessing future drought risks under an increasingly warmer climate, more drought indices from ecological and socioeconomic perspectives should be investigated and compared to provide a complete picture of drought and its potential impacts on the dynamically coupled nature-human system.

Keywords

Blue River Basin Drought index Climate change GCMs 

References

  1. Alley WM (1984) The palmer drought severity index: limitations and assumptions. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:1100–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndt DS (2002) The Oklahoma drought of 2001–2002. Oklahoma Event Summary. Oklahoma Climatological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  3. Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J Roy Stat Soc B 26:211–234Google Scholar
  4. Cook ER, Woodhouse CA, Eakin CM, Meko DM, Stahle DW (2004) Long-term aridity changes in the western United States. Science 306:1015–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dai A, Trenberth KE, Qian T (2004) A global data set of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J Hydrol 5:1117–1130Google Scholar
  6. Edwards DC, McKee TB (1997) Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United States at multiple time scales. Climatology Report Number 97–2. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  7. Guttman NB (1998) Comparing the Palmer drought index and the Standardized Precipitation Index. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heim RR Jr (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 83:1149–1165Google Scholar
  9. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Jain S, Keshri R, Goswami A, Sarkar A (2010) Application of meteorological and vegetation indices for evaluation of drought impact: a case study for Rajasthan, India. Nat Hazard 54:643–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States: a state of knowledge report from the U.S. Global Change Research Program. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim TW, Valdes JB, Aparicio J (2002) Frequency and spatial characteristics of droughts in the Conchos River Basin, Mexico. Water Int 27(3):420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Landsberg HE (1982) Climatic aspects of drought. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63:593–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu L, Hong Y, Hocker EJ, Shafer AM, Carter ML, Gourley JJ, Bednarczyk NC, Adhikari P (2012) Analyzing projected changes and trends of temperature and precipitation in the southern U.S. from 16 downscaled global climate models under different emission scenarios. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-011-0567-9
  15. Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Tzabiras J (2008) Climate change effects on drought severity. D Adv Geosci 17:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maurer EP, Wood AW, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP, Nijssen B (2002) A long-term hydrologically-based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J Climate 15:3237–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maurer EP, Brekke L, Pruitt T, Duffy PB (2007) Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos Trans AGU 88(47). doi: 10.1029/2007EO470006
  18. McCabe GJ, Markstrom SL (2007) A monthly water-balance model driven by a graphical user interface. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1088, 12ppGoogle Scholar
  19. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, and Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Preprints. 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, pp. 179–184. January 17–22, Anaheim, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  20. Namias J (1966) Nature and possible causes of the northeastern United States Drought during 1962–1965. Mon Weather Rev 94(9):543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Narasimhan B and Srinivasan R (2005) Development and evaluation of Soil Moisture Deficit Index (SMDI) and Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for agricultural drought monitoring. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Volume 133, Issues 1–4, 10 November 2005, Pages 69–88, ISSN 0168–1923, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.07.012
  22. National Drought Mitigation Center (2006) Accessed 07/30/11: http://drought.unl.edu/whatis/indices.htm
  23. Nordhaus W (1994) Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. OWRB (2003) The Arbuckle-Simpson hydrology study: management and protection of an Oklahoma water resource. November 2003Google Scholar
  25. Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. Research Paper No. 45. U.S. Weather BureauGoogle Scholar
  26. Piñol J, Terradas J, Lloret F (1998) Climate warming, wildfire hazard, and wildfire occurrence in coastal eastern Spain. Clim Chang 38:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qin SG (2011) Farmlands of ancient Loulan Kingdom before 1500 years and its environment. Quaternary sciences: the view from the mountains. 21–27 July 2011, Bern, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  28. Rathore MS (2004) State level analysis of drought policies and impacts in Rajasthan, India. Working paper 93, Drought Series, Paper 6, International Water Management InstituteGoogle Scholar
  29. Raziei T, Saghafian B, Paulo A, Pereira L, Bordi I (2009) Spatial patterns and temporal variability of drought in western Iran. Water Resour Manag 23(3):439–455. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9282-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Riebsame WE, Changnon SA, and Karl TR (1991) Drought and natural resources management in the United States: Impacts and implications of the 1987–89 Drought. Westview Press, 174ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Stine S (1994) Extreme and persistent drought in California and Patagonia during mediaeval time. Nature 369:546–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsakiris G (2008) Uni-dimensional analysis of droughts for management decisions. European Water 23(24):3–11Google Scholar
  34. Tsakiris G, Pangalou D, Vangelis H (2007) Regional drought assessment based on the Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI). Water Resour Manag 21:821–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vasiliades L, Loukas A, Liberis N (2011) A water balance derived drought index for Pinios River Basin, Greece. Water Resour Manag 25(4):1087–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wan Z, Wang P and Li X (2004) Using MODIS land surface temperature and normalized difference vegetation index products for monitoring drought in the Southern Great Plains, USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 25, Issue 1, doi: 10.1080/0143116031000115328
  37. Wang J, Rich PM, Price KP (2003) Temporal responses of NDVI to precipitation and temperature in the central Great Plains, USA. Int J Remote Sens 24:2345–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Well N, Goddard S, Hayes M (2004) A self-calibrating palmer drought severity index. J Clim 17(12):2335–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilhite D, Glantz M (1985) Understanding the drought phenomenon: the role of definition. Water Int 10:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Woodhouse C, Overpeck J (1998) 2000 Years of drought variability in the central United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(12):2693–2714, American Meteorological SocietyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yong B, Ren L-L, Hong Y, Wang J, Gourley JJ, Jiang S, Chen X, Wang W (2010) Hydrologic evaluation of multi-satellite precipitation analysis standard precipitation products in basins beyond its inclined latitude band: a case study in Laohahe River basin, China. Water Resour Res 46:W07542. doi:10.1029/2009WR008965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lu Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yang Hong
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christopher N. Bednarczyk
    • 4
    • 5
  • Bin Yong
    • 6
    • 1
  • Mark A. Shafer
    • 2
  • Rachel Riley
    • 2
  • James E. Hocker
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and Environmental ScienceUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Southern Climate Impacts Planning Program, Oklahoma Climatological SurveyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  3. 3.Atmospheric Radar Research CenterUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  4. 4.Research Experiences for Undergraduates ProgramNational Weather Center, University of OklahomaNormanUSA
  5. 5.Valparaiso UniversityValparaisoUSA
  6. 6.State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations