Water Resources Management

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 2233–2241 | Cite as

Water Quality Monitoring and Hydraulic Evaluation of a Household Roof Runoff Harvesting System in France

  • C. Vialle
  • C. Sablayrolles
  • M. Lovera
  • M.-C. Huau
  • S. Jacob
  • M. Montrejaud-Vignoles
Article

Abstract

The quality of harvested rainwater used for toilet flushing in a private house in the south-west of France was assessed over a one-year period. Twenty-one physicochemical parameters were screened using standard analytical techniques. The microbiological quality of stored roof runoff was also investigated and total flora at 22°C and 36°C, total coliforms, Escherichia Coli, enteroccocci, Cryptospridium oocysts, Giardia cysts, Legionella species, Legionella pneumophila, Aeromonas, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were analysed. Chemical and microbiological parameters fluctuated during the course of the study, with the highest levels of microbiological contamination observed in roof runoffs collected during the summer. Overall, the collected rainwater had a relatively good physicochemical quality but variable, and, did not meet the requirements for drinking water and a microbiological contamination of the water was observed. The water balance of a 4-people standard family rainwater harvesting system was also calculated in this case study. The following parameters were calculated: rainfall, toilets flushing demand, mains water, rainwater used and water saving efficiency. The experimental water saving efficiency was calculated as 87%. The collection of rainwater from roofs, its storage and subsequent use for toilet flushing can save 42 m3 of potable water per year for the studied system.

Keywords

Rainwater collection Physicochemical quality Microbiological quality Water saving efficiency Case study Toilet flushing 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Sotralentz Habitat for their provision of rainwater-harvesting equipment and Laurent Monier (Veolia Eau, Saint-Maurice, France) for his technical support.

References

  1. Aladenola O, Adeboye O (2010) Assessing the potential or rainwater harvesting. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2129–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Khashman OA (2009) Chemical characteristics of rainwater collected at a western site of Jordan. Atmos Res 91(1):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrechtsen HJ (2002) Microbiological investigations of rainwater and graywater collected for toilet flushing. Water Sci Technol 46(6–7):311–316Google Scholar
  4. Blangis D, Legube B (2007) Treatment of rain water by solar photocatalysis. Eur J Water Qual 38(2):121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chilton JC, Maidment GG, Marriott D, Francis A, Tobias G (1999) Case study of a rainwater recovery system in a commercial building with a large roof. Urban Water 1:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crabtree KD, Ruskin RH, Shaw SB, Rose JB (1996) The detection of cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in cistern water in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Water Res 30(1):208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Despins C, Farahbakhsh K, Leidl C (2009) Assessment of rainwater quality from rainwater harvesting systems in Ontario, Canada. J Water Supply Res Technol - Aqua 58(2):117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans CA, Coombes PJ, Dunstan RH (2006) Wind, rain and bacteria: the effect of weather on the microbial composition of roof-harvested rainwater. Water Res 40(1):37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans CA, Coombes PJ, Dunstan RH, Harrison T (2009) Extensive bacterial diversity indicates the potential operation of a dynamic micro-ecology within domestic rainwater storage systems. Sci Total Environ 407(19):5206–5215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fewkes A (1999a) Modelling the performance ofrainwater collection systems: towards a generalised approach. Urban Water 1:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fewkes A (1999b) The use of rainwater for WC flushing: the field testing of a collection system. Build Environ 34:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fewtrell L, Kay D (2007) Microbial quality of rainwater supplies in developed countries: a review. Urban Water J 4(4):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Förster J (1999) Variability of roof runoff quality. Water Sci Technol 39(5):137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handia L (2005) Comparative study of rainwater quality in urban Zambia. J Water Supply Res Technol - Aqua 54(1):55–64Google Scholar
  15. Herrmann T, Schmida U (1999) Rainwater utilisation in Germany: efficiency, dimensioning, hydraulic and environmental aspects. Urban Water 1:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horak HM, Chynoweth JS, Myers WP, Davis J, Fendorf S, Boehm AB (2010) Microbial and metal water quality in rain catchments compared with traditional drinking water sources in the East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea. J Water Health 8(1):126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khastagir A, Jayasuriya N (2011) Investment evaluation of rainwater tanks. Water Resour Manag 25(14):3769–3784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulshrestha UC, Kulshrestha MJ, Sekar R, Sastry GSR, Vairamani M (2003) Chemical characteristics of rainwater at an urban site of south-central India. Atmos Environ 37(21):3019–3026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee JY, Yang JS, Han M, Choi J (2010) Comparison of the microbiological and chemical characterization of harvested rainwater and reservoir water as alternative water resources. Sci Total Environ 408(4):896–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. May S, Prado RTA (2006) Experimental evaluation of rainwater quality for non-potable applications in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Urban Water J 3(3):145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melidis P, Akratos CS, Tsihrintzis VA, Trikilidou E (2007) Characterization of rain and roof drainage water quality in Xanthi, Greece. Environ Monit Assess 127(1–3):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mendez CB, Klenzendorf JB, Afshar BR, Simmons MT, Barrett ME, Kinney KA, Kirisits MJ (2011) The effect of roofing material on the quality of harvested rainwater. Water Res 45(5):2049–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nolde E (2007) Possibilities of rainwater utilisation in densely populated areas including precipitation runoffs from traffic surfaces. Desalination 215(1–3):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oesterholt F, Martijnse G, Medema G, van der Kooij D (2007) Health risk assessment of non-potable domestic water supplies in the Netherlands. J Water Supply Res Technol - Aqua 56(3):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Polkowska Z, Gorecki T, Namiesnik J (2002) Quality of roof runoff waters from an urban region (Gdansk, Poland). Chemosphere 49(10):1275–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sazakli E, Alexopoulos A, Leotsinidis M (2007) Rainwater harvesting, quality assessment and utilization in Kefalonia Island, Greece. Water Res 41(9):2039–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schriewer A, Horn H, Helmreich B (2008) Time focused measurements of roof runoff quality. Corros Sci 50(2):384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simmons G, Hope V, Lewis G, Whitmore J, Gao W (2001) Contamination of potable roof-collected rainwater in Auckland, New Zealand. Water Res 35(6):1518–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsakovski S, Tobiszewski M, Simeonov V, Polkowska Z, Namiesnik J (2010) Chemical composition of water from roofs in Gdansk, Poland. Environ Pollut 158(1):84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uba BN, Aghogho O (2000) Rainwater quality from different roof catchments in the Port Harcourt district, rivers state, Nigeria. J Water Supply Res Technol - Aqua 49(5):281–288Google Scholar
  31. Villarreal EL, Dixon A (2005) Analysis of a rainwater collection system for domestic water supply in Ringdansen, Norrköping, Sweden. Build Environ 40:1174–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Y, Grant A, Sharma A, Chen D, Chen L (2010) Alternative water resources for rural residential development in Western Australia. Water Resour Manag 24(1):25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Vialle
    • 1
  • C. Sablayrolles
    • 1
  • M. Lovera
    • 2
  • M.-C. Huau
    • 3
  • S. Jacob
    • 4
  • M. Montrejaud-Vignoles
    • 1
  1. 1.INRA; Université de Toulouse; INP; LCA (Laboratoire de Chimie Agro-Industrielle); ENSIACETToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Veolia Water North America, Technical Direction GroupIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.Veolia EauParisFrance
  4. 4.Veolia Eau, Direction Technique, Immeuble Giovanni Battista BSaint MauriceFrance

Personalised recommendations