Water Resources Management

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 981–996 | Cite as

Definition of Risk Indicators for Reservoirs Management Optimization

Article

Abstract

An alternative procedure for drought risk assessment and for the mitigation of drought risk is proposed in the paper. An analysis of the relationship between failure of water supply systems and reservoir volumes for the urban area of Firenze in central Tuscany, in central Italy, is performed. Long term simulations are carried out using the software package WEAP. A simplified model of the water resources system is built to assess the threshold values and the management rules. The probability to have definite degree of shortage in the water supply system is evaluated in function of the volume stored in the reservoir at the beginning of the month with Monte Carlo simulations. The reservoir levels and volumes are simulated using time series of the period 1970–2005. Four scenarios (i.e. normal, pre-alert, alert and emergency) associated with different levels of severity of drought are defined. Threshold values are identified considering the probability to assure a given fraction of the demand in a certain time horizon, and are calibrated with an optimization method, which try to minimize the water shortages, especially the heavier. The critical situations are assessed month by month in order to evaluate optimal management rules during the year and avoid conditions of total water shortage.

Keywords

Drought Risk thresholds Water supply systems Tuscany-Italy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alecci S, Reitano B, Rossi G (1986) Evolution of alternatives in management of water resources systems through performance indices. In: Proc of international conference on water resources, needs and planning in drought prone areas, Khartoum, SudanGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreu J, Capilla J, Sanchis E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. J Hydrol 177:269–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Autorità di Bacino del Fiume Arno (2008) Piano di Bacino, Stralcio Bilancio Idrico (Basin authority plan: water balance). Gazzetta Ufficiale 78Google Scholar
  4. Cancelliere A, Ancarani A, Rossi G (1998) Susceptibility of water supply reservoirs to drought conditions. J Hydrol Eng 3:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cañón J, González J, Valdés J (2009) Reservoir operation and water allocation to mitigate drought effects in crops: a multilevel optimization using the drought frequency index. J Water Res 135(6):458–465Google Scholar
  6. Chang FJ, Chen L, Chang L (2005) Optimizing the reservoir operating rule curves by genetic algorithms. Hydrol Process 19:2277–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dracup JA, Lee KS, Paulson EG (1980) On the definition of droughts. Water Resour Res 16(2):297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrote L, Iglesias A, Flores F (2008) Development of drought management plans in Spain. In: Iglesias A, Cancelliere A, Wilhite DA, Garrote L, Cubillo F (eds) Coping with drought risk in agriculture and water supply systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–184Google Scholar
  9. Haan CT (1977) Statistical methods in hydrology. The Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagman G (1984) Prevention better than cure: report on human and natural disasters in the third world. Swedish Red Cross, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsu SY, Tung C P, Chen CJ, Wang C (2004) Application to reservoir operation rule-curves. Proc of world water and environmental resources congress 2004. ASCE Conference Proc 138:304–314Google Scholar
  12. Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, Moneo M (2007) Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resour Manag 21:775–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawrance AJ, Kottegoda NT (1977) Stochastic modeling of riverflow time series. J R Stat Soc Ser A (General) 140–1:1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mannucci E (1985) Il miracolo del tubo. Panorama 1016:232–236Google Scholar
  15. Pliefke T, Sperbeck ST, Urban M, Peil U, Budelmann H (2007) A standardized methodology for managing disaster risk—an attempt to remove ambiguity. In: Proc of 5th international probabilistic workshop, GhentGoogle Scholar
  16. Revfeim KJA, Jordan RB (1976) Precision of evaporation measurements using the Bowen ratio. Bound Layer Meteorol 10:97–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rossi G (2000) Drought mitigation measures: a comprehensive framework. In: Vogtand JV, Somma F (eds) Drought and drought mitigation in Europe. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 233–246Google Scholar
  18. Rossi G (2003) An integrated approach to drought mitigation in Mediterranean regions. In: Rossi G et al (eds) Tools for drought mitigation in mediterranean regions. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rossi G (2007) Monitoraggio del fenomeno (Risk monitoring). In: Rossi G (ed) Siccità: analisi, monitoraggio e mitigazione. Applicazioni in Sicilia (Drought: analysis, monitoring and mitigation. Applications in region Sicily). Nuova Bios, Cosenza, pp 15–48Google Scholar
  20. Rossi G, Castiglione L, Bonaccorso B (2007a) Chapter 16: Guidelines for planning and implementing drought mitigation measures. In: Rossi G et al (eds) Methods and tools for drought analysis and management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 325–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rossi G, Cancelliere A, Giuliano G (2007b) Chapter 11 Reducing shortage risk of water supply systems under drought conditions. In: La Loggia G, Aronica GT, Ciraolo G (eds) Water resources assessment under water scarcity scenarios. Centro Studi Idraulica Urbana, Milan, pp 221–246Google Scholar
  22. Sargent DM (1979) Reservoir operating rules for drought conditions. Hydrol Sci J 24(1):83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sechi GM, Sulis A (2010) Intercomparison of generic simulation models for water resource systems. In: Proc of International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 2010 international congress, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  24. SEI Stockholm Environment Institute (2005) WEAP: water evaluation and planning system, user guide. SEI, SomervilleGoogle Scholar
  25. Werick WJ (1993) National study of water management during drought: results-oriented water resources management. In: Hon K (ed) Water management in the 90’s. ASCE, New York, pp 445–450Google Scholar
  26. Wilhite DA (2008) Drought monitoring as a component of drought preparedness planning. In: Iglesias A, Cancelliere A, Wilhite DA, Garrote L, Cubillo F (eds) Coping with drought risk in agriculture and water supply systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  27. Yevjevich V, Hall WA, Salas JD (1978) Drought research needs. Water Resources Publication, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli Studi di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Universidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations