Water Resources Management

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1601–1613 | Cite as

Evaluation of Global Daily Reference ET Using Oklahoma’s Environmental Monitoring Network—MESONET

  • Wenjuan Liu
  • Yang Hong
  • Sadiq Khan
  • Mingbin Huang
  • Trevor Grout
  • Pradeep Adhikari
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential utility of the USGS Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) 1-degree, daily reference Evapotranspiration (ET0) products by comparing them with observed Oklahoma mesonet daily ET0 over a 2 year period (2005–2006). The comparison showed a close match between the two independent ET0 products, with bias within a range of 10% for most of the sites and the overall bias of − 2.80%. The temporal patterns are strongly correlated, with a correlation coefficient above 0.9 for all groups. In summary, we conclude that (1) the consistent low bias shows the original GDAS ET0 products have high potentials to be used in land surface modeling; (2) the high temporal correlations demonstrate the capability of GDAS ET0 to represent the major atmospheric processes that control the daily variation of surface hydrology; (3) The temporal and spatial correspondences in trend between independent datasets (GDAS and MESONET) were good. The finding in Oklahoma, a different hydro-climate region from a similar regional study conducted in California by Senay et al. (J Am Water Res Assoc 44(4):969–979, 2008), reconfirms the reliability and potential of using GDAS reference ET for regional energy balance and water resources management in many parts of the world.

Keywords

Evapotranspiration (ET) Reference ET GDAS Oklahoma MESONET 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen RG (2007) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC). Appl J Irrig Drain Eng 133(4):395–406. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437133:4(395) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen RG, Smith M, Perrier A, Pereira LS (1994a) An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bull 43(2):1–34Google Scholar
  3. Allen RG, Smith M, Perrier A, Pereira LS (1994b) An update for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bull 43(2):35–92Google Scholar
  4. Allen RG, Pereira L, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 290. FAO publication 56 ISBN 92-5-104219-5Google Scholar
  5. Brock FV, Crawford KC, Elliott RL, Cuperus GW, Stadler SJ, Johnson HL, Eilts MD (1995) The Oklahoma Mesonet: a technical overview. J Atmos Ocean Technol 12:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brotzge JA, Richardson SJ (2003) Spatial and temporal correlation among Oklahoma Mesonet and OASIS surface-layer measurements. J Appl Meteorol 42(5–19). Am Meteorol SocGoogle Scholar
  7. Chauhan S, Shrivastava RK (2009) Performance evaluation of reference evapotranspiration estimation using climate based methods and artificial neural networks. Water Resour Manag 23:825–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) (2004) ArcGIS 9.0. Users manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  9. GDAS: http://earlywarning.usgs.gov/Global/ET0readme.php. Assessed 20–30 October 2008
  10. Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, p 332Google Scholar
  11. Krishnan A, Kushwaha RS (1971) A critical study of evaporation by Penman’s method during the growing season of vegetation in the arid zone of India. Arch Meteorol Geophys Bioklimatol B 19:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nokes SE (1995) Evapotranspiration (chap 4). In: Ward AD, Elliot WJ (eds) Environmental hydrology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 91–131Google Scholar
  13. Oklahoma Mesonet: http://www.mesonet.org. Accessed 3–10 November 2008
  14. Penman HL (1956) Evaporation: an introductory survey. Neth J Agric Sci 1:9–29, 87–97, 151–153Google Scholar
  15. Sabziparvar AA, Tabari H, Aeini A, Ghafouri M (2010) Evaluation of class a pan coefficient models for estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration in cold semi-arid and warm arid climates. Water Resour Manag 24:909–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Senay GB, Budde M, Verdin JP, Melesse AM (2007) A coupled remote sensing and simplified surface energy balance approach to estimate actual evapotranspiration from irrigated fields. Sensors 7(6):979–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Senay GB, Verdin JP, Lietzow R, Melesse AM (2008) Global daily reference evapotranspiration modeling and evaluation. J Am Water Res Assoc 44(4):969–979. ISSN 1093-474X CODEN JWRAF5 2008Google Scholar
  18. Shuttleworth WJ (1992) Evaporation. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Sutherland A, Carlson JD, Kizer M (2005) Evapotranspiration product description Oklahoma Mesonet, Oklahoma State University, University of OklahomaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenjuan Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Yang Hong
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sadiq Khan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mingbin Huang
    • 1
    • 5
  • Trevor Grout
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pradeep Adhikari
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Resource and EnvironmentNorthwest A&F UniversityYanglingChina
  2. 2.School of Civil Engineering and Environmental ScienceUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  3. 3.Center for Natural Hazard and Disaster ResearchNational Weather CenterNormanUSA
  4. 4.Institution of Earth EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  5. 5.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water ConservationChinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water ResourcesYanglingChina

Personalised recommendations