Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Water-Saving Measures for the Water Framework Directive: the Case of the Guadalquivir River Basin in Southern Spain

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the still scarce literature on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) in water scarce areas illustrated through a case study in Southern Spain. CEA is the preferred method to select policy measures to achieve the good ecological status of water bodies as prescribed by the WFD. It generates a ranking of the measures, according to the ratio between the equivalent annual cost and the reduction of impacts, to select the measures to be included in the Program of Measures (PoM). Here, the water-saving measures discussed in the public participation process for the elaboration of the PoM for the Guadalquivir River Basin are analysed using CEA. A methodological approach, including uncertainty for cost and efficiency of measures is proposed. A comparison between pressure and impact analysis of the effectiveness of measures shows that, in the context of the WFD, CEA should be based on the impact of the measures rather than on the pressure reduction, as the latter can lead to a misleading ranking of the water-saving measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AEAS (2008) Agua potable y saneamiento en España. XI Encuesta nacional. Asociación Española de Abastecimiento de Aguas y Saneamiento. www.aeas.es

  2. Andreu J, Capilla J, Sanchis E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalized decision support system for water-resources planning and management. J Hydrol 177:269–291

  3. Andreu J, Solera A, Paredes J, Pérez MA, Pulido M (2008) Decision support tools for policy making. European Water Research Day (Zaragoza), European Communities, pp 31–36

  4. Andreu J, Ferrer-Polo J, Pérez MA, Solera A (2009) Decision support system for drought planning and management in the Jucar river basin, Spain. In: 18th world IMACS/MODSIM congress, 13–17 July, Cairns, Australia. http://mssanz.org.au/modsim09

  5. Arrow KJ, Lind RC (1970) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. Am Econ Rev 60(3):364–78

  6. Asian Development Bank (2002) Handbook for integrating risk analysis in the economic analysis of projects. Manila

  7. Aulong S, Bouzit M, Dörfliger N (2009) Integrating water balance and cost-effectiveness analysis for water management: an application in Jordan and Lebanon. Water Resour Manag 23:731–753

  8. Barton D, Saloranta T, Bakkent TH, Solheim AL, Moe J, Selvik JR, Vagstad N (2005) Using Bayesian network models to incorporate uncertainty in the economic analysis of pollution abatement under the Water Framework Directive. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply 5(6):95–104

  9. Berbel J, Mesa P, Martin-Ortega J (2009) El análisis coste-eficacia en los Programas de Medidas de la DMA. En: Gómez-Limón, JA et al. La economía del agua de riego en España. Una perspectiva regional. Fundación Cajamar Almería

  10. Brouwer R, de Blois C (2008) Integrated modeling of risk and uncertainty underlying the cost and effectiveness of water quality measures. Environ Model Softw 23(7):922–937

  11. Carballo R, Cancela JJ, Iglesias G, Marin A, Neira XX, Cuesta TS (2009) WFD indicators and definition of the ecological status of rivers. Water Resour Manag 23:2231–2247

  12. CMA-Agencia Andaluza del Agua (2009) Acuerdo por el Agua de Andalucía. Sevilla (3 de febrero 2009)

  13. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir (2007) Inventario de Regadíos 2008

  14. Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro-MARM (2008) Memoria del Plan Hidrológico de Cuenca de la sub-cuenca del Jalón. Documento de trabajo, versión junio 2008. Zaragoza

  15. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir (2010a) Guadalquivir river basin management plan. Discussion document for draft program of measures annex 10 (version July 2010). Sevilla

  16. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir (2010b) River basin description. www.chguadalquivir.es

  17. DEFRA (2007) Preliminary cost effectiveness analysis of the Water Framework Directive. Revised after stakeholder review. December. Available at http://www.wfdcrp.co.uk/

  18. Eastman JR, Kyeam PAK, Todleadno J, Jin W (1993) GIS and decision making. The United Nations Institute for Training and Research, Geneva

  19. European Commission (2003) Economics and the environment: the implementation challenge of the water framework directive. A guidance document (WATECO), Brussels

  20. Folketinget (2003) Lov om miljømål m.v. for vandforekomster og international naturbeskyttelsesområder (Miljømålsloven). Lov nr. 1150 af 17/12-2003

  21. Government of Navarra-MIMAN (2002) Análisis económico del Plan de Cuenca del Cidacos. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Gobierno de Navarra, Madrid

  22. Graham DA (1984) Cost–benefit analysis under uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 74(5):1100–102

  23. Gren IM, Elofsson K, Jannke P (1997) Cost-effective nutrient reductions to the Baltic Sea. Environ Resour Econ 10(4):261–269

  24. Guo P, Huang GH, Zhu H (2009) Interval-parameter two-stage stochastic semi-infinite programming: application to Water Resour Manag under uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 23:1001–1023

  25. Gutiérrez C, Martin-Ortega J, Berbel J (2009) Situation and tendencies of the agricultural use of water in the Guadalquivir River Basin. Rev Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 220(4):163–176

  26. Hanley N, Wright R, Alvarez-Farizo B (2006) Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the Water Framework Directive. J Environ Manag 78:183–193

  27. Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellín-Azuara J, Lund R, Howitt RE (2009) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375:627–643

  28. Heinz I, Pulido-Velázquez M, Lund JR, Andreu J (2007) Hydro-economic modeling in river basin management: implications and applications for the European Water Framework Directive. Water Resour Manag 21(7):1103–1125

  29. Holvoet K, Gevaert V, van Griensven A, Seuntjens P, Vanrolleghem PA (2007) Modelling the effectiveness of agricultural measures to reduce the amount of pesticides entering surface waters. Water Resour Manag 21:2027–2035

  30. Huntingford C, Jones RG, Prudhomme C, Lamb R, Gash JHC, Jones DA (2003) Regional climate-model predictions of extreme rainfall for a changing climate. Q J R Meteorol Soc 129:1607–1621

  31. Iglesias A, Estrela T, Gallart F (2005) Impactos sobre los recursos hídricos In: Moreno J (ed) Evaluación preliminar de los impactos en España por el efecto del cambio climático Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid 303–352

  32. Interwies E, Kraemer A, Kranz N, Görlach B, Dworak T (2004) Basic principles for selecting the most cost-effective combinations of measures for inclusion in the programme of measures as described in article 11 of the Water framework directive HANDBOOK. German Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin

  33. IPCC (2007) Working Group I Fourth assessment report ‘The Physical Science Basis’ Geneva, Switzerland

  34. Jacobsen J (2007) In search of cost-effective measures—Danish report on the use of cost-effectiveness analysis when implementing the EU Water Framework Directive. Institute of Food and Resource Economics Report No 191, Copenhagen

  35. Kranz N, Görlach B, Interwies E (2004) Making the right choice—a methodology for selecting cost-effective measures for the Water Framework Directive. Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law 1(3):228–233

  36. Loukas A, Mylopoulos N, Valisiades L (2007) A modelling system for the evaluation of Water Resour Manag trategies in Thessaly, Greece. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1673–1702

  37. MARM (2008) Instrucción de planificación hidrológica. Orden MARM/2656/2008 de 10 septiembre por la que se aprueba la instrucción de la planificación hidrológica. BOE núm. 229, de 22 de septiembre de 2008

  38. MARM (2009a) Guía técnica para la caracterización de medidas May 2009

  39. MARM (2009b) SICMACE: sistema de información para la caracterización de Medidas para el Análisis Coste-Eficacia

  40. Martin-Ortega J, Berbel J (2010) Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the Water Framework. Directive Scie Total Envir 408:3990–3997

  41. Martin-Ortega J, Gutierrez C, Berbel J (2008) Caracterización de los usos del agua en el Guadalquivir en aplicación de la Directiva Marco del Agua. Rev Estud Reg 81:45–76

  42. Pavlov SS, Roerink GJ, Hellegers PJ, Popovych VF (2002) Irrigation performance assessment in Crimea, Ukraine. Water Resour Dev 22(1):61–78

  43. Pulido-Velazquez M, Andreu J, Sahuquillo A (2008) Hydro-economic river basin modelling: the application of a holistic surface-groundwater model to assess opportunity costs of water use in Spain. Ecol Econ 66(1):51–65

  44. Rejman W (2007) EU Water Framework Directive versus real needs for groundwater management. Water Resour Manag 21:1363–1372

  45. Sigel K, Klauer B, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decision-making: the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. Ecol Econ 69(13):592–510

  46. Spencer T, Ancev T, Connor J (2009) Improving cost effectiveness of irrigation zoning for salinity mitigation by introducing Offsets. Water Resour Manag 23:2085–2100

  47. Trémolet Consulting (2006) Analysis of member states and Pilot river basin submissions on the state of play for cost-effectiveness analysis in the WFD. A draft report for the department for environment, food and rural affairs, UK. Available at: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=EP01032_4622_FRP.doc

  48. Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2010) Planning against long term water scarcity: a fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9692-y

  49. Van de Veeren RJHM, Lorenz CM (2002) Integrated economic–ecological analysis and evaluation of management strategies on nutrient abatement in the Rhine basin. J Environ Manag 66(4):361–376

  50. Van Engelen D, Seidelin C, van der Veeren R, Barton DN, Queb K (2008) Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Water Policy 10:207–220

  51. Xenarios S, Bithas K (2009) Welfare improvisation form the receiving waters of urban wastewater systems in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Water Resour Manag 23:981–1000

  52. Xu YP, Tung YK (2008) Decision-making in water management under uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 22:353–550

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Julio Berbel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berbel, J., Martin-Ortega, J. & Mesa, P. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Water-Saving Measures for the Water Framework Directive: the Case of the Guadalquivir River Basin in Southern Spain. Water Resour Manage 25, 623–640 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9717-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Water Framework Directive
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Uncertainty
  • Water-saving measures