Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 1947–1964 | Cite as

Detection of Streamflow Change in the Susquehanna River Basin

  • Zhenxing ZhangEmail author
  • Andrew D. Dehoff
  • Robert D. Pody
  • John W. Balay
Article

Abstract

Streamflow statistics are commonly used for purposes of planning and managing water resources in the Susquehanna River Basin. For accurately estimating streamflow statistics, it is important to identify whether there are increasing or decreasing changes during the period of records and whether the change is gradual or abrupt. This study employs repeated monotonic trend tests with varying beginning and ending time for detecting changes in streamflow in tributaries within the Susquehanna River Basin. The method is employed to analyze long-term streamflow trends and detect change for annual minimum, median, and maximum daily streamflow for eight unregulated watersheds within the basin. Monthly baseflow and storm runoff are investigated. The results show a considerable increase in annual minimum flow for most of the examined watersheds and a noticeable increase in annual median flow for about half of the examined watersheds. Both these streamflow increases were abrupt, with only a few years of transition centered around 1970. The abrupt change in annual minimum and median flows appears to occur in the summer and fall seasons. The abrupt change in annual minimum and median flows is due to increased flows in the summer and fall seasons. The results also indicate there is no long-term significant increasing or decreasing change in annual maximum flow in the examined watersheds.

Keywords

Streamflow Change detection Trend test Mann–Kendall’s method Susquehanna River Basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen W, Lee C (2003) Estimating ground-water recharge from streamflow records. Environ Geol 44:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dery SJ, Stahl K, Moore RD, Whitfield PH, Menounos B, Burford JE (2009) Detection of runoff timing change in pluvial, nival, and glacial rivers of western Canada. Water Resour Res 45:W04426. doi: 10.1029/2008WR006975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Douglas EM, Vogel RM, Kroll CN (2000) Trends in floods and low flow in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. J Hydrol 240:90–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Groisman PY, Knight RW, Karl TR (2001) Heavy precipitation and high streamflow in the contiguous United States: trends in the 20th century. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:219–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (1992) Statistical methods in water resources. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirsch RM, Slack JR (1984) A non-parametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence. Water Resour Res 20:727–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Institute of Hydrology (1980a) Low flow studies. Report No 1. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Institute of Hydrology (1980b) Low flow studies. Report No 3. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalra A, Piechota TC, Davies R, Tootle GA (2008) Changes in U.S. streamflow and Western US snowpack. J Hydrol Eng 13(3):156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kendall MG (1962) Rank correlation methods, 3rd edn. Hafner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Koutsoyiannis D (2002) The Hurst phenomenon and fractional Gaussian noise made easy. Hydrol Sci J 47(4):573–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koutsoyiannis D (2003) Climate change, the Hurst phenomenon, and hydrological statistics. Hydrol Sci J 48(1):3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koutsoyiannis D, Montanari A (2007) Statistical analysis of hydroclimatic time series: uncertainty and insights. Water Resour Res 43:W05429. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koutsoyiannis D, Montanari A, Lins HF, Cohn TA (2009) Climate, hydrology and freshwater: towards an interactive incorporation of hydrological experience into climate research—DISCUSSION of “The implications of projected climate change for freshwater resources and their management”. Hydrol Sci J 54(2):394–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kroll CN, Luz JG, Allen TB, Vogel RM (2004) Developing a watershed characteristics database to improve low streamflow prediction. J Hydrol Eng, ASCE 9(2):116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kulkarni A, von Storch H (1995) Monte Carlo experiments on the effect of serial correlation on the Mann–Kendall test of trend. Met Z 4(2):82–85Google Scholar
  17. Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Wallis JR (1994) Hydro-climatological trends in the continental United States, 1948–88. J Climate 7:586–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lins HF, Slack JR (1999) Streamflow trends in the United States. Geophys Res Lett 26(2):227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lins HF, Stakhiv EZ (1998) Managing the nation’s water in a changeing climate. J Am Water Res Assoc 34(6):1255–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric test against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (2002) A step increase in streamflow in the conterminous United States. Geophys Res Lett 29(24):2185. doi: 10.1029/2002GL015999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller WP, Piechota TC (2008) Regional analysis of tend and step change observed in hydroclimatic variables around the Colorado River basin. J Hydrometeorol 9(5):1020–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management. Science 319:573–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slack JR, Landwehr JM (1992) Hydro-climatic data network: a U.S. Geological Survey streamflow data set for the United States for the study of climate variations, 1874–1988. US Geological Survey Open File Report 92–129Google Scholar
  25. Sloto RA, Crouse MY (1996) Hysep: a computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis. US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation Report 96-4040Google Scholar
  26. Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) (2006) Conowingo pond management plan. SRBC publication no 242Google Scholar
  27. Vogel RM, Bell CJ, Fennessey NM (1997) Climate streamflow and water supply in the northeastern United States. J Hydrol 198(1–4):42–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. von Storch H (1995) Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research. In: von Storch H, Navarra A (eds) Analysis of climate variability: applications of statistical techniques. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–26Google Scholar
  29. Wahl TL (1988) BFI, a computer program for determining an index to base flow. FORTRANGoogle Scholar
  30. Wahl KL, Wahl TL (1988) Effects of regional ground-water declines on streamflow in the Oklahoma Panhandle. Symposium on Water-Use Data for Water Resources Management. American Water Resources Association, Tucson, AZ, pp 239–249Google Scholar
  31. Wu H, Soh L-K, Smal A, Chen X-H (2008) Trend analysis of streamflow drought events in Nebraska. Water Resour Manage 22:145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yue S, Pilon P (2003) Interaction between deterministic trend and autoregressive process. Water Resour Res 39(4):1077. doi: 10.1029/2001WR001210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yue S, Wang CY (2002) Applicability of prewhitening to eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the Mann–Kendall test. Water Resour Res 38(6):1068. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yue S, Wang CY (2004) The Mann–Kendall test modified by effective sample size to detect trend in serially correlated hydrological series. Water Resour Manage 18:201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yue S, Pilon P, Cavadias G (2002a) Power of the Mann–Kendall and Spearman’s rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological series. J Hydrol 259:254–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B, Cavadias G (2002b) The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological serials. Hydrol Process 16:1807–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang Z, Kroll C (2007a) Closer look at the baseflow correlation method. J Hydrol Eng, ASCE 12(2):190–196. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(190) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Z, Kroll C (2007b) The baseflow correlation method with multiple gauged sites. J Hydrol 347(3–4):371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Z, Dehoff AD, Pody RD (2010) A new approach to identify trend pattern of streamflow. J Hydrol Eng, ASCE. doi: 10.1016/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000179
  40. Zhu J, Day RL (2005) Analysis of streamflow trends and the effects of climate in Pennsylvania, 1971 to 2001. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(6):1939–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhenxing Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew D. Dehoff
    • 1
  • Robert D. Pody
    • 1
  • John W. Balay
    • 1
  1. 1.Susquehanna River Basin CommissionHarrisburgUSA

Personalised recommendations