Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Compromise Programming Model to Integrated Urban Water Management

  • 596 Accesses

  • 50 Citations

Abstract

Integrated urban water management is an important and critical matter in every city and country. Many objectives and criteria such as satisfaction of the urban water consumers, the national benefits and social hazards must be considered in the integrated urban water management. So the integrated urban water management can be considered as a multi-objective problem. In this paper, a mathematical model which uses the compromise programming model is presented to optimize this multi-objective problem. Three famous objectives involving water distribution cost, leakage water and social satisfaction level are considered. To evaluate the performance and efficiency of the proposed model, Hamedan potable water network is chosen as a case study. Results show that the proposed model is capable to present effective solutions for the considered problem. So the proposed mathematical model can be used as an efficient tool for the integrated urban water management in every urban area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishi M, Marina Miguel A (2005) Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J Water Resour Plan Manage 131:326–335

  2. Abrishamchi A, Tajrishi M (1997) Multi-criteria decision making in irrigation planning. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran (in Farsi)

  3. Bender MJ, Simonovic SP (2000) A fuzzy compromise approaches to water resource systems planning under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115:35–44. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00025-1

  4. Butcher W, Hames Y, Hall W (1969) Dynamic programming for the optimal sequences of water supply projects. Water Resour Res 5:1196–1204

  5. Corderio Netto O, Parent E, Duckstein L (1996) Multi criterion design of long-term water supply in Southern France. J Water Resour Plan Manage 122:403–413. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:6(403)

  6. Duckstein L, Opricovic S (1980) Multi objective optimization in river basin development. Water Resour Res 16:14–20. doi:10.1029/WR016i001p00014

  7. Duckstein L, Bobee B, Ashkar F (1991) A multiple criteria decision modeling approach to selection of estimation techniques for fitting extreme floods. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 5:227–238. doi:10.1007/BF01544059

  8. Hyde KM, Maier HR, Colby CB (2005) A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making. J Environ Manag 77(4):278–290. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.011

  9. Lund JR (1987) Evaluation and scheduling of water conservation. J Water Resour Plan Manage 110:696–708. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1987)113:5(696)

  10. Morin T, Esoue A (1971) Some efficient dynamic programming algorithms for the optimal sequencing and scheduling of water supply project’s. Water Resour Res 7:479–484. doi:10.1029/WR007i003p00479

  11. Rubenstein J, Ortolano L (1984) Water conservation and capacity expansion. J Water Resour Plan Manage 110:220–230. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1984)110:2(220)

  12. Saaty TL (1990) Multicriteria decision making: the analytical hierarchical process: planning, priority setting, allocation. RWS, Pittsburgh

  13. Simonovic S (1989) Application of water resources systems concept to the formulation of a water master plan. Water Int 14:37–50. doi:10.1080/02508068908692032

  14. Srdjevic B (2007) Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management. Decis Support Syst 42(4):2261–2273. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.08.001

  15. Tecle A, Duckstein L (1994) Concepts of multi criterion decision making. Multi criteria decision analysis in water resources management. IHP of UNESCO, Paris, pp 33–62

  16. Zarghami M (2006) Integrated water resources management in Polrud irrigation system. Water Resour Manag 20:215–225. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-8048-0

  17. Zarghami M, Abrishamchi A, Ardakanian R (2008) Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management. Water Resour Manag 22:1017–1029. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9207-7

  18. Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Parviz Fattahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fattahi, P., Fayyaz, S. A Compromise Programming Model to Integrated Urban Water Management. Water Resour Manage 24, 1211–1227 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9492-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Multi-objective decision making
  • Compromise programming
  • Water distribution network
  • Integrated urban water management (IUWM)