Water Resources Management

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 457–475 | Cite as

Groundwater Demand Management in the Great Lakes Basin—Directions for New Policies

  • Satya P. Mohapatra
  • Anne MitchellEmail author


Demand-side management should be used to maximize the efficiency of groundwater use. Implementation of conservation measures would decrease the volume of water use and also exert less pressure on the water distribution system as well as the wastewater treatment system. Allocation of ground water in the Great Lakes basin must conform to priorities established at the community level. Groundwater pricing should reflect the full costs arising from ground water use. A differential pricing structure would help conserve water in the residential and industrial sectors. A user-friendly database on ground water use, quality and quantity for the entire Great Lakes basin is also essential. New policies for sustainable groundwater allocation, regulating water prices for water conservation, conservation education, pollution prevention, recycling and reuse of water as well as effective information management provide new directions for managing the groundwater demand in the Great Lakes basin.


Great Lakes Groundwater Demand management Allocation Conservation Pricing Pollution prevention Recycling Reuse Information management New policies 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asano T (2002) Water from (waste) water—the dependable water resource. Water Sci Technol 43:24–33Google Scholar
  2. Backeberg GR (2005) Water institutional reforms in South Africa. Water Policy 7:107–123Google Scholar
  3. Beekman GB (1998) Water conservation, recycling and reuse. Water Resour Dev 14:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd DR (2001) Canada vs. the OECD: an environmental comparison. Eco-Research Chair of Environmental Law and Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
  5. Brooks DB (2006) An operational definition of water demand management. Int J Water Resour Dev 22:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CGLG (2005) Annex 2001 Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement, Council of Great Lakes Governors, December 2005.
  7. Christensen R, Magwood S (2005) Groundwater pricing policies in Canada. Sierra Legal Defence Fund, Vancouver, B.C., February 2005.
  8. CIELAP (2004) Sustainability in the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence River Ecosystem. Presentation to the Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development. Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy, Toronto, April, 2004.
  9. CIELAP (2007) Great Lakes Blueprint: a Canadian vision for protecting and restoring the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Ecosystem. September 2007.
  10. City of Toronto (2008) Residential toilet replacement program.
  11. Clark EH II (2007) Water prices rising worldwide. Earth Policy Institute, Washington DC, March 2007.
  12. Conboy MJ, Goss MJ (2000) Natural protection of groundwater against bacteria of fecal origin. J Contam Hydrol 43:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CPAU (2006) Landscape efficiency standards. The City of Palo Alto Utilities.
  14. Crowe AS, Shikaze SG (2004) Linkages between groundwater and coastal wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 7:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DEFRA (2006) Extended plans for improved water efficiency in housing. U.K. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
  16. De Loë R (2005) Agricultural water use: a methodology and estimates for Ontario (1991, 1996 and 2001). Can Water Resour J 30:111–128Google Scholar
  17. De Loë RC, Di Giantomasso SE, Kreutzwiser RD (2002) Local capacity for groundwater protection in Ontario. Environ Manag 29:217–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dragnet JO, Cronin AA (2004) Use and abuse of the urban groundwater resource: implications for a new management strategy. Hydrogeol J 12:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ECO (2000) Changing Perspectives, Annual Report 1999/2000. Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  20. ECO (2001) Ontario’s permit to take water program and the protection of Ontario’s water resources. Brief to the Walkerton Inquiry. Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, January 2001Google Scholar
  21. Environment Canada (2001) Municipal water pricing 1991–1999. Environmental Economics Branch, Environment Canada.
  22. Environment Canada (2004) Water use and supply project.
  23. EPA (2003) Water and wastewater pricing: an informational overview. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 2003.
  24. EPA (2007) Conservation of biological diversity in the Great Lakes basin ecosystem: issues and opportunities. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
  25. Farid C, Jackson J, Clark K (1997) The fate of the Great Lakes: sustaining or draining the sweetwater seas?
  26. Formiga-Johnssona RM, Kumlerb L, Lemosc MC (2007) The politics of bulk water pricing in Brazil: lessons from the Parai´ba do Sul basin. Water Policy 9:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foster S, Garduño H, Kemper K, Tuinhof A, Nanni M, Dumars C (2006) Groundwater quality protection: defining strategy and setting priorities. Briefing note series No. 8. GW-Mate Core Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
  28. Foster SSD (2001) The interdependence of groundwater and urbanisation in rapidly developing cities. Urban Water 3:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galloway G, Pentland R (2003) Managing water resources in the Great Lakes basin: securing our future. Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto, Working Paper #2, October 2003.
  30. Garduño H, Foster S, Dumars C, Kemper K, Tuinhof A, Nanni M (2006) Groundwater abstraction rights: from theory to practice. Briefing note series no. 5. GW-Mate Core Group, World Bank, Washington D.C.
  31. GLC (2004) Water resources management decision support system for the Great Lakes. Great Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  32. GLC (2006) Annual report of the Great Lakes regional water use database repository. Lakes. Great Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan, November 2006.
  33. Gleick P (2001) Making every drop count. Scientific American, 28–33 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  34. Glynn JK (2002) Impacts of agriculture on water quantity in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence Basin: executive summary. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
  35. Gorrie P (2004) Big Pipe hits new snag: environmental groups launch Fisheries Act prosecution. Toronto Star, 9 July 2004Google Scholar
  36. Government of Australia (2006) Water Efficiency Labels and Standards (WELS) Act, 2005.
  37. Grannemann NG, Hunt RJ, Nicholas JR, Reilly TE, Winter TC (2000) The importance of ground water in the Great Lakes region. USGS Water Resources InvestigationsGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK (2007) Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resour Manag 21:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoffman N, Mitchell B (1995) Evolving toward participatory water management: the permit to take water program and commercial water bottling in Ontario. Can Water Resour J 20:91–100Google Scholar
  40. Holtschag DJ, Nicholas JR (1998) Indirect ground-water discharge to the Great Lakes. USGS Open-File Report 98–579Google Scholar
  41. Horbulyk TM (2005) Markets, policy and allocation of water resources among sectors: constraints and opportunities. Can Water Resour J 30:55–64Google Scholar
  42. Hutson SS, Barber NL, Kenny JF, Linsey KS, Lumia DS, Maupin MA (2004) Estimated use of water in the United States in 2000. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268Google Scholar
  43. IJC (2000) Protection of the waters of the Great Lakes—final report to the governments of Canada and the United States. International Joint Commission.
  44. IJC (2006) 13th biennial report on Great Lakes water quality. International Joint Commission, December 2006.
  45. Isiorho SA, Beeching FM, Stewart PM, Whitman RL (1996) Seepage measurements from Long Lake, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Environ Geol 28:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ivey JL, Smithers J, De Loë RC, Kreutzwiser RD (2004) Community capacity for adaptation to climate-induced water shortages: linking institutional complexity and local actors. Environ Manag 33:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jefferson B, Laine A, Parsons S, Stephenson T, Judd S (1999) Technologies for domestic wastewater recycling. Urban Water 1:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kemper K, Foster S, Garduño H, Nanni M, Tuinhof A (2006) Economic instruments for groundwater management: using incentives to improve sustainability. Briefing note series no. 7. GW-Mate Core Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
  49. Kendy E (2003) The false promise of sustainable pumping rates. Ground Water 41:2–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kishino H, Ishida H, Iwabu H, Nakano I (1996) Domestic wastewater reuse using a submerged bioreactor. Desalination 160:115–119Google Scholar
  51. Kreutzwiser RD, De Loë RC, Durley J, Priddlie C (2004) Water allocation and the permit to take water program in Ontario: challenges and opportunities. Can Water Resour J 29:135–146Google Scholar
  52. Lu W, Leung AYT (2003) A preliminary study on potential of developing shower/laundry wastewater reclamation and reuse system. Chemosphere 52:1451–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lundqvist J (2000) High water withdrawal ratio implies changed water policy. Phys Chem Earth (B) 25:193–198Google Scholar
  54. Minnesota DNR (2006) Drought response plan Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. July 2006.
  55. MNR (2004) Provincial Water Resources Information Project WRIP. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
  56. MNR, MOE, MAFRA, MMAH, MEDT, AMO, Conservation Ontario (2003) Ontario low water response, July 2003.
  57. MOE (2004) Welcome to the groundwater studies homepage.
  58. MOE (2005) Permits to take water. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, April 2005.
  59. Morris TJ, Mohapatra SP, Mitchell A (2006) Sustainable ground water allocation in the Great Lakes basin. Water Resour Dev 22:615–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morris TJ, Mohapatra SP, Mitchell A (2008) Conflicts, costs and environmental degradation— impacts of antiquated ground water allocation policies in the Great Lakes basin. Water Policy 10:459–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mortsch L, Hengeveld H, Lister M, Lofgren B, Quinn F, Slivitzky WL (2002) Climate change impacts on the hydrology of the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence system. Can Water Resour J 25:153–179Google Scholar
  62. Niemczynowicz J (1999) Urban hydrology and water management—present and future challenges. Urban Water 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. OECD (1999) Household water pricing in OECD countries. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, May 1999Google Scholar
  64. OECD (2004) Key environmental indicators 2004. Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation Environmental Directorate, Paris, France.
  65. Pirie RL, de Loë RC, Kreutzwiser R (2004) Drought planning and water allocation: an assessment of local capacity in Minnesota. J Environ Manag 73(1):25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. PRI (2005) Economic instruments for water demand management in an integrated water resources management framework. Policy Research InitiativeGoogle Scholar
  67. Renzetti S (1999) Municipal water supply and sewage treatment: costs, prices, and distortions. Can J Econ 32:688–704Google Scholar
  68. Renzetti S (2005) Economic instruments and Canadian industrial water use. Can Water Resour J 30:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Renzetti S, Dupont D (1999) An assessment of the impact of charging for provincial water use permits. Can Public Policy 25(3):361–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rogers P, de Silva R, Bhatia R (2002) Water is an economic good: how to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy 4:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rutherford S (2004) Groundwater use in Canada. West Coast Environmental Law.
  72. Schindler DW (2001) The cumulative effects of climate warming and other human stresses on Canadian freshwaters in the new millennium. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Seikh B, Cooper RC, Israel KE (1999) Hygienic evaluation of reclaimed water used to irrigate food crops—a case study. Water Sci Technol 40:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Solley WB, Pierce RR, Perlman HA (1993) Estimated use of water in the United States in 1990. USGS National Circular 1081Google Scholar
  75. Solley WB, Pierce RR, Perlman HA (1998) Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1200Google Scholar
  76. Stakhiv EZ (1998) Policy implications of climate change impacts on water resources management. Water Policy 1:159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Swainson G (2004) Water draining plan for Big Pipe okayed. Critics fear for moraine aquifer—dozens of housing projects set to go. Toronto Star, 7 October 2004Google Scholar
  78. Terpstra PMJ (1999) Sustainable water usage systems: models for the sustainable utilization of domestic water in urban areas. Water Sci Technol 39:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tuinhof A, Dumars C, Foster S, Kemper K, Garduño H, Nanni M (2006) Groundwater resource management: an introduction to its scope and practice. Briefing note series no. 1. GW-Mate Core Group, World Bank, Washington D.C.
  80. UNESCO (2003) World Water Development Report, 2003.
  81. Viklander P, Eigenbrod D (2000) Stone movements and permeability changes in till caused by freezing and thawing. Cold Reg Sci Technol 31:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ward FA (2007) Decision support for water policy: a review of economic concepts and tools. Water Policy 9:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ward FA, King JP (1998) Reducing institutional barriers to water conservation. Water Policy 1:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Williams DD, Williams NE, Cao Y (1999) Road salt contamination of groundwater in a major metropolitan area and development of a biological index to monitor its impact. Water Res 34:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wisconsin DNR (2004) Summary of Groundwater Quantity Legislation - 2003 WI Act 310 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, April 2004Google Scholar
  86. Wood WW (2003) A fresh water Odyssey: some observations on the global resource. Ground Water 41:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. WWAP (2006) World water development report—water, a shared responsibility. UN-Water’s World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), United Nations, March 2006.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and PolicyTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations