Water Resources Management

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 1241–1257 | Cite as

Globalizing Integrated Water Resources Management: A Complicated Option in Southern Africa

Article

Abstract

There is empirical evidence to show that global water resources management paradigm shifts, guided by neo-liberal principles, have played a significant role in the emergence of the integrated water resources management school of thought. In turn, this school of thought has guided most water sector reforms in Southern Africa. Using case studies from South Africa and Zimbabwe, the paper explores the structural influence of integrated water resources management discourses and mainstream development theories promoted at the global level on developing economies. It further explores the utility of the integrated water resources management framework at the local levels. The paper goes beyond theory and articulates some of the key processes that took place in the Mazowe catchment in Zimbabwe and the Inkomati catchment in South Africa where the water reform programmes were piloted. Some insights on the application of neo-liberal principles in the water sectors of Southern African countries begin to emerge from the paper.

Keywords

Globalization Neo-liberalism Poverty Stakeholder participation Institutions Integrated water resources management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson AJ (2005) Engaging disadvantaged communities: lessons from the Inkomati CMA establishment process. Paper presented at the workshop on ‘African water laws: plural legislative frameworks for rural water management in Africa’, 26–27 January 2005, IWMI/NRI, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton PJ, Turton AR, Dirk J, Rou DJ (2006) Exploring the government, society, and science interfaces in integrated water resource management in South Africa. J Contemp Water Res Educ 135:28–35 (December)Google Scholar
  3. Basson MS, Van Niekerk PH, Van Rooyen JA (1997) Overview of water resources availability and utilization in South Africa. DWAF Report No. P RSA/00/0197, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas AK (2004) Integrated water resources management: a reassessment. Water Int 29(2):248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolding A (1997) Caught in the catchment: Past, present and future management of Nyanyadzi river water. In: Derman B, Nhira C (eds) Towards reforming the institutional and legal basis of the water sector in Zimbabwe. CASS, HarareGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown J, Woodhouse P (2004) Pioneering redistributive regulatory reform: a study of implementation of a catchment management agency for the Inkomati water management area, South Africa. Draft reportGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns BR, Meinzen-Dick R (2005) Frameworks for water rights: an overview of institutional options. In: Bruns BR, Ringler C, Meinzen-Dick R. Water rights reform: lessons for institutional design. IFPRI, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Butterworth J, Moriarty P, Van Koppen B (eds) (2004) Beyond domestic: case studies on poverty and productive uses of water at the household level. IRC, DelftGoogle Scholar
  9. Cardwell EH, Cole AR, Cartwright AL, Martin AL (2006) Integrated water resources management: definitions and conceptual musings in. J Contemp Water Res Educ 135:8–18 (December)Google Scholar
  10. Castells M (1992) Four Asian tigers with a dragon head: a comparative analysis of the state, economy and society in the Asian pacific rim. In: Henderson R, Applebaum J (eds) State and development in the Asian pacific rim. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Central Statistics Office (1998) Poverty in Zimbabwe. Central Statistics Office, HarareGoogle Scholar
  12. Chikozho C, Latham CJK (2005) Implications of customary law for implementing integrated water resources management in Zimbabwe: Considerations of Shona customary law as an institutional alternative. Paper presented at the workshop on African water laws: plural legislative frameworks for rural water management in Africa, 26-27 January 2005, Willow-Park Conference Centre, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  13. Cousins B (2000) Introduction: does land and agrarian reform have a future and, if so, who will benefit? In: Ben Cousins (ed) At the crossroads: land and agrarian reform in South Africa into the 21st century. PLAAS, University of the Western Cape, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  14. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (1999) Government Gazette, October 1999 no. 20491Google Scholar
  15. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (2003) Catchment management agency establishment process guidelines. DWAF, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  16. Derman B (2003) The incredible heaviness of water: water policy and water reform in the new millennium in Southern Africa. Michigan State University, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  17. Derman B, Hellum A (2003) Renegotiating water and land rights in Zimbabwe: some reflections on legal pluralism. Draft of paper prepared for presentation at the Conference on Remaking Law in Africa: Trans-Nationalism, Persons and RightsGoogle Scholar
  18. Derman B, Nhira C (eds) (1997) Towards reforming the Institutional and legal basis of the water sector in Zimbabwe. CASS, HarareGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (1995) Reforming water resources policy – a guide to methods, processes and practices. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 52, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. Galbraith JK (2002) A perfect crime: inequality in the age of globalization. Daedalus, WinterGoogle Scholar
  21. Geldenhuys A (1997) The national water act: a short review. De Rebus, Pretoria, pp 58–61 (November)Google Scholar
  22. Global Water Partnership (2002) Tool-box for integrated water resources management: policy guidance and operational tools, version 1. GWP, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurrell A, Woods N (eds) (2000) Inequality, globalization, and world politics. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirsten J, Perret S, Van Zyl J (2000) Land reform and the new water management context in South Africa: principles, progress, and issues. Paper prepared for a seminar of the natural resources management cluster and land policy thematic group. The World Bank, Washington, DC (27 September)Google Scholar
  25. Krugman P (1992) Toward a counter-revolution in development theory. In World Bank Economic Review Supplement (Proceedings of the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, pp 15–39Google Scholar
  26. Lankford BA, Douglas J, Merrey DJ, Cour J, Hepworth N (2007) From integrated to expedient: an adaptive framework for river basin management in developing countries. Research Report 110, IWMI, ColomboGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim JJ (2005) On the role of the state in an increasingly borderless world. Globalization, volume 5, issue 1Google Scholar
  28. Meinzen-Dick RS, Van der Hoek W (2001) Multiple uses of water in irrigated areas in. Irrig Drain Syst 15:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merle S, Oudot S (2000) Strategies, technical systems and socio-economic status of small-scale farmers in an irrigation scheme in the northern province, South Africa: diagnosis and prospects in a rehabilitation and transfer of management context. CIRAD-CEMAGREF ReportGoogle Scholar
  30. Mkandawire T (2001) Thinking about developmental states in Africa. Camb J Econ 25(3):289–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moriarty PB, Batchelor CH, Smits SJ, Pollard JA, Butterworth J, Reddy B, Renuka B, James AJ, Reddy MYV (2004) Demands and entitlements: a framework for holistic and problem-focused water resources assessments. WHIRL Project Working Paper No. 10. (http://www.nri.org/whirl)
  32. Mukhtarov FG (2006) Integrated water resources management from a policy transfer perspective. Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  33. Pegram G, Bofilatos E (2005) Considerations on the composition of CMA governing boards to achieve representation. Paper presented at the workshop on African water laws: plural legislative frameworks for rural water management in Africa. Willow-park Conference Centre, Johannesburg (26–27 January)Google Scholar
  34. RAWOO (2000) Coping with globalization: the need for research concerning local response to globalization in developing countries. Rawoo, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  35. Schreiner B, Van Koppen B (2001) Catchment management agencies for poverty eradication in South Africa. Paper prepared for the 2nd WARFSA/WaterNet symposium: integrated water resources management: theory, practice, cases. Cape Town, pp 30–31 (October)Google Scholar
  36. Shah T, Makin I, Sakthivadivel R (2005) Limits to leapfrogging: issues in transposing successful river basin management institutions in the developing world. In: Svendsen M (ed) Irrigation and river basin management: options for governance and institutions. CABI and IWMI, London, pp 31–50Google Scholar
  37. Versfeld D (2003) Water for livelihoods: bringing equity and opportunity to the rural poor in South Africa”. Paper presented at the international symposium on water, poverty and productive uses of water at the household level. Muldersdrift, South Africa, 21–23 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  38. Wade R (2001) Global inequality, winners and losers. The Economist, p 72 (28 April)Google Scholar
  39. Woodhouse P, Hassan R (1999) Implementation of the national water act: catchment management agencies, interests, access and efficiency: Inkomati Basin pilot study. DWAF and Department of International Development, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  40. World Bank (1989) Sub-Saharan Africa: from crisis to sustainable growth. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban Management (UMMP)Ethiopian Civil Service CollegeAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations