Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 925–942 | Cite as

Equitable Gender Participation in Local Water Governance: An Insight into Institutional Paradoxes

  • Nandita Singh
Article

Abstract

The participation of local stakeholders in governance of water resources is regarded as inalienable for ensuring efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability. To enhance gender balance in the water governance process, institutions are being designed and executed globally to elicit enhanced participation of women. This paper contends that in the context of local communities, the new institutional framework is divorced from the traditional social institutions that in turn operationalize their resource management systems. Based upon empirical evidence from rural Indian setting, the paper deciphers the paradoxes between the two sets of institutional paradigms and illustrates how these paradoxes at the ‘interface’ between the local community context and the development strategy lead to problems with effective women’s participation. On the basis of the findings, it argues that the institutional paradigm for achieving equitable gender participation in local water governance does not represent a truly ‘bottom-up’ approach. It further raises the concern that if the institutional paradigm for participation is contradictory to local institutions, then how can the objectives of participation founded thereupon be seen as achievable? The paper proposes the need to design participatory paradigms that are more realistically rooted in community-based institutional frameworks so as to enhance effectiveness of the endeavors.

Keywords

Gender Participation Water governance Gender equity Decentralization India Traditional resource management system Women 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson J (1982) Review: anthropology. Signs 8:236–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Beteille A (1996) Caste. In: Barnard A, Spencer J (eds) Encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology. Routledge, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Binamungu D (1994) Towards gender-responsive planning in the HESAWA program: a critical review. In Report of Workshop on Gender and Water Resources Management, Stockholm, 1–3 December 1993. SIDA, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn J, Chambers R, Gaventa J (2000) Mainstreaming participation in development. OED Working Paper Series 10. World Bank, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleaver F (1998) Informal arrangements for local resource management. Waterlines 16(4):12–14Google Scholar
  7. Cohen J, Uphoff N (1980) Participation’s place in rural development: seeking clarity through specificity. World Dev 8:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coles A, Wallace T (eds) (2005) Gender, water and development. Berg, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornwall A (2002) Making spaces, changing places: situating participation in development. IDS Working Paper 170. IDS, Brighton, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornwall A, Gaventa J (2001) From users and choosers to makers and shapers: repositioning participation in social policy. IDS Working Paper 127. IDS, Brighton, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. de Pina-Cabral J (1986) Sons of Adam, daughters of Eve. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumont L (1988) Homo hierarchicus: the caste system and its implications. Oxford University Press, Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (EC) (2003) Public participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive. CIS for the Water Framework Directive, Guidance Document No. 8. EC, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  14. Evertzen, A. (2001) Handbook for Gender and Local Governance, SNV. http://www.kit.nl/gcg/assets/images/Gender_and_Local_Governance.doc. Cited 20 Jan 2006
  15. Friedl E (1987) The position of women: appearance and reality. In: Dubisch J (ed) Gender and power in rural Greece. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghurye GS (1969) Caste and race in India. Popular Prakashan, Bombay, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  17. The Gender and Water Development Report (GWDR) (2003) Gender perspectives on policies in the water sector. WEDC (for GWA), LeicestershireGoogle Scholar
  18. GWA (2003) Advocacy manual for gender and water ambassadors. WEDC (for GWA), LeicestershireGoogle Scholar
  19. ICF (2001) International Conference on Fresh Water, Bonn, 3–7 December 2001. Conference Report. www.Water-2001.de Cited 14 Feb 2005
  20. ICWE (1992) Development issues for the 21st century. The Dublin Statement Report. International Conference on Water and the Environment (ICWE), January 26–31, 1992 DublinGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalland A (1994) Indigenous knowledge–local knowledge: prospects and limitations. In: Arctic Environment: a report on the seminar on integration of indigenous peoples’ knowledge. Ministry of Environment/The Home Rule of Greenland, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  22. Khosla P, Ahmed S (2006) Mainstreaming gender in water management. GWA/UNDPGoogle Scholar
  23. Khosla P, van Wijk C, Verhagen J, James V (2004) Gender and water. Thematic overview paper. IRC, DelftGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuks SMM (2004) Water governance and institutional change. University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamphere L (1974) Strategies, cooperation and conflict among women in domestic groups. In: Rosaldo M, Lamphere L (eds) Women, culture and society. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Lamphere L, Ragoné H, Zavella P (1997) Introduction. In: Lamphere L, Ragoné H, Zavella P (eds) Situated lives: gender and culture in everyday life. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Lansing JS (1987) Balinese water temples and the management of irrigation. Am Anthropol 89:326–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis HT (1993) Traditional ecological knowledge: some definitions. In: Williams NM, Baines G (eds) Traditional ecological knowledge: wisdom for sustainable development. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  29. Long N (1999) An actor-oriented approach to development intervention. Background paper prepared for APO Meeting, Tokyo 22–26 April 2002Google Scholar
  30. MacCormack CP, Strathern M (eds) (1980) Nature, culture and gender. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Matiza T (1994) Gender and wetlands management: issues and challenges in Southern Africa. In: Report of Workshop on Gender and Water Resources Management, Stockholm, 1–3 December 1993. SIDA, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  32. Meigs A (1990) Multiple gender ideologies and statuses. In: Sanday PR, Goodenough RG (eds) Beyond the second sex: new directions in the anthropology of gender. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Meinzein-Dick R, Zwarteveen M (1998) Gendered participation in water management: issues and illustrations from water users’ associations in South Asia. Agric Human Values 15:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MoRD (2002) Annual report 2001–2002. Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  35. Narayan D (1995) The contribution of people’s participation: evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. ESD occasional paper series no. 1. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Orlove BS, Brush SB (1996) Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity. Annu Rev Anthropol 25:329–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prokopy LS (2004) Women’s participation in rural water supply projects in India: is it moving beyond tokenism and does it matter? Water Policy 6:103–116Google Scholar
  38. Rogers SC (1975) Female forms of power and the myth of male dominance: a model of female/male interaction in peasant society. Am Ethnol 2:727–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance. TEC background paper no. 7. Global Water Partnership (GWP), SwedenGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanday PR, Goodenough RG (eds) (1990) Beyond the second sex: new directions in the anthropology of gender. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlegel A (1990) Gender meanings: general and specific. In: Sanday PR, Goodenough RG (eds) Beyond the second sex: new directions in the anthropology of gender. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  42. Seymour-Smith C (1986) Macmillan dictionary of anthropology. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh Y (1988) Modernization of Indian tradition. Rawat Publications, Jaipur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh N (1998) Intra-tribal variation among the Munda and development perspective. Unfolding the reality. Indian Anthropol 28(1):41–54Google Scholar
  45. Singh N (2000) Understanding identity and its integration: a study of the Mundas of Chotanagpur. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh N (2006) Indigenous water management systems: interpreting symbolic dimensions in common property resource regimes. Soc Nat Resour 19(4):357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh N, Jacks G, Bhattacharya P (2005) Women and community water supply programmes: an analysis from socio-cultural perspective. Nat Resour Forum 29(3):213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Srinivas MN (1959) The dominant caste in Rampura. Am Anthropol 61:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stevenson MG (1996) Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Arctic 49:278–291Google Scholar
  50. UNDP (2003) Mainstreaming gender in water management: a practical journey to sustainability. UNDP/BDP Energy and Environment Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. van Wijk C (1998) Gender in water resources management, water supply and sanitation: roles and realities revisited. IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  52. Verhagen J, James AJ, van Wijk C, Nanavaty R, Parikh M, Bhatt M (2004) Linking water supply and poverty alleviation: the impact of women’s productive use of water and time on household economy and gender relations in Banaskantha District, Gujarat, India. IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, DelftGoogle Scholar
  53. Woroniuk B (1994) Introduction. Report of Workshop on Gender and Water Resources Management, Stockholm, 1–3 December 1993. SIDA, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  54. Woroniuk B, Thomas H, Schalkwyk J (1997) Gender: the concept, its meaning and uses – a think piece. Gender and Development Training Centre, Haarlen NLGoogle Scholar
  55. World Water Development Report (WWDR) (2003) Water for people, water for life. The UNGoogle Scholar
  56. Zwartaveen M, Neupane N (1996) Free riders or victims: women’s non-participation in irrigation management in Nepal’s Chattis Mauja irrigation scheme. IIMI Research Report No. 7. Colombo: IIMIGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Land and Water Resources EngineeringRoyal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations