Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 409–421 | Cite as

Impact of Declining Trend of Flow on Harike Wetland, India

  • Sanjay K. Jain
  • Archana Sarkar
  • Vaibhav Garg
Article

Abstract

Harike wetland in the Indian state of Punjab is formed by a barrage built downstream on the confluence of rivers Satluj and Beas, with the idea of storing and providing irrigation and drinking water to parts of Southern Punjab and adjoining Rajasthan. Due to decrease in flow at Harike and deforestation etc. in the catchment area, the wetland is reducing in the last few years. In this study, the analysis of rainfall/runoff data has been carried out to see the effect of decreasing trend of runoff on wetland area. Wetland area has been delineated using remote sensing technique. The analysis of rainfall, discharge and ground water level showed that the flow pattern is decreasing at Harike. The remote sensing data revealed that the wetland area has reduced approximately 30% over the last 13 years.

Keywords

Wetland Runoff Ground water Remote sensing Aquatic Waterlogged 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsdorf DE, Smith LC, Melack JM (2001) Amazon floodplain water level changes measured with interferometric SIR-C radar. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(2):423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1990) Wetlands of India – a directory. Ministry of Environment & Forest, Govt. of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Kasischke ES, Brunzell SM, Mudd JP, Smith KB, Frick, AL (2001) Analysis of space-borne SAR data for wetland mapping in Virginia riparian ecosystems. Int J Remote Sens 22(18):3665–3687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chopra R, Verma VK, Sharma PK (2001) Mapping, monitoring and conservation of Harike wetland ecosystem, Punjab, India, through remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens, 22(1):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gopal B (1994) Role of ecotones in conservation and management of tropical inland waters. Mitt Int Verein Theor Angew Limnol 24:17–25Google Scholar
  6. Jerath N (1992) The environs and problems of Harike wetland; some strategies for conservation. In: Chatrath KJS (ed) Wetlands of India. Ashish, New Delhi, India, pp 103–124Google Scholar
  7. Lunetta R, Balogh M (1999) Application of multi-temporal landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 65(11):1303–1310Google Scholar
  8. MacKinnon F (2001) Wetland application of LIDAR data: analysis of vegetation types and heights in wetlands, 44 p. Applied Geomatics Research Group, Centre of Geographical Sciences, Nova ScotiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Majumdar PK, Kumar S, Singh RD, Jain SK, Sarkar A (2004) Regional ground water modeling in Satluj Beas basin in Central Punjab. Project report, National Institute of HydrologyGoogle Scholar
  10. McFeeters SK (1996) The use of normalised difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens 17(7):1425–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3 edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Neural Power (2003) Neural network professional version 2.5 CPC-X Software, Copyright: 1997–2003 http://www.geocities.com/neuralpower/)
  13. Ramachandra TV (2001) Restoration and management strategies of wetlands in developing countries. Electron Green J 15:1–15 (December)Google Scholar
  14. Rio JNR, Lozano-Garcia DF (2000) Spatial filtering of radar data (RADARSAT) for wetlands (brackish marshes) classification. Remote Sens Environ 73:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shaikh M, Green D, Cross H (2001) A remote sensing approach to determine environmental flows for wetlands of the Lower Darling River, New South Wales, Australia. Int J Remote Sens 22(9):1737–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shepherd I, Wilkinson G, Thompson J (2000) Monitoring surface water storage in the north Kent Marshes using Landsat TM Images. Int J Remote Sens 21(9) 1843–1865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Töyrä J, Pietroniro A, Martz LW (2001) Multisensor hydrologic assessment of a freshwater wetland. Remote Sens Environ 75:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Water and Power Consultancy Services (India) Limited (WAPCOS) (1996) Operation of Bhakra and Pong reservoirs during flood and other flood mitigation measures. Final report (May)Google Scholar
  19. Zhu M, Fujita M, Hashimoto N (1994) Application of neural networks to runoff prediction. In: Hipel KW et al. (eds) Stochastic and statistical method in hydrology and environmental engineering, vol. 3, pp 205–216. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of HydrologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations