Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 919–932 | Cite as

Use of climate scenarios to aid in decision analysis for interannual water supply planning

  • James S. Risbey
  • Kais Hamza
  • John S. Marsden
Original Article

Abstract

This work addresses the issue of climate change in the context of water resource planning on the time scale of a few years. Planning on this time scale generally ignores the role of climate change. However, where the climate of a region has already shifted, the use of historical data for planning purposes may be misleading. In order to test this, a case study is conducted for a region, the Australian Capital Territory, where long term drought is raising concerns of a possible climate shift. The issue is cast in terms of a particular planning decision; the option to augment water supply in the next few years to hedge against the drought persisting. A set of climate scenarios are constructed for the region corresponding to the historical climate regime and to regimes where progressively greater levels of change are assumed to have already taken place (5%, 10%, 20% reductions in mean rainfall). Probabilities of the drought persisting are calculated for each of the scenarios. The results show substantial increases in the probability of the drought persisting for even moderate reductions in mean rainfall. The sensitivity of the decision to augment supply to the scenario results depends ultimately on the planners tolerable thresholds for the probability of the drought persisting. The use of different scenarios enables planners to explore the sensitivity of the decision in terms of their risk tolerance to ongoing drought and to their degree of belief in each of the scenarios tested.

Keywords

Drought management Climate scenarios Climate change Water resources Decision analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACTEW (2004) Options for the next ACT water source. Technical report. ACTEW Corporation. CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. ACTEW (2005) ACTEW Corporation Annual Report 2005. Technical report, ACTEW Corporation. Canberra, pp 88Google Scholar
  3. Arnell N, Liu C, et al. (2001) Hydrology and water resources, In: Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, chapter 4, 191–233. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. p 1032Google Scholar
  4. Box G, Jenkins G (1976) Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Holden Day, San Francisco, p 575Google Scholar
  5. Chiew F, McMahon T (2001) Modelling the impacts of climate change on Australian streamflow. Hydrol Proc 16:1235–1245Google Scholar
  6. Chiew F, Zhou S, McMahon T (2003) Use of seasonal streamflow forecasts in water resources management. J Hydrology 270(1-2):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CSIRO (2001) Climate change projections for Australia. Technical report, CSIRO Australia, p 8Google Scholar
  8. Gleick PH (1989) Climate change, hydrology, and water resources. Rev Geophys 27:329–344Google Scholar
  9. Hartmann D, Wallace J, Limpasuvan V, Thompson D, Holton J (2003) Can ozone depletion and global warming interact to produce rapid climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97(4):1412–1417Google Scholar
  10. Hirst AC, O'Farrell SP, Gordon HB (2000) Comparison of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model with and without oceanic eddy-induced advection. Part I: Ocean spinup and control integrations. J Clim 13(1):139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IOCI (2002) Climate variability and change in south west Western Australia. Technical report, Indian ocean climate initiative, Perth, Australia. pp 43Google Scholar
  12. Jasper K, Gurtz J, Lang H (2002) Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine watersheds by coupling meteorological observations and forecasts with a distributed hydrological model. J Hydrology 267(1–2):40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karoly D (2003) Ozone and climate change. Science 302:236–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karoly D, Risbey J, Reynolds A, Braganza K (2003) Global warming signature in Australia's worst drought. Aust Sci 24(3):14–17Google Scholar
  15. Krzysztofowicz R (2001) The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology. J Hydrology 249(1–4):2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavery B, Joung G, Nicholls N (1997). An extended high quality historical rainfall data set for Australia. Aust Met Mag 46 (1):27–38Google Scholar
  17. MacKellar D (1993) My country and other poems. Viking, Ringwood, p 108Google Scholar
  18. Narisma G, Pitman AJ (2003) The impact of 200 years of land cover change on the Australian near-surface climate. J Hydromet 4:424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicholls N (2004) The changing nature of Australian droughts. Clim Change 63:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rind D, Goldberg R, Ruedy R (1989) Change in climate variability in the 21st century. Clim Change 14:5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Risbey J, Karoly D, Reynolds A, Braganza K (2003) Global warming signature in Australia's worst drought. Bull Aust Met Ocn Soc 16:6–11Google Scholar
  22. Risbey JS (1998) Sensitivities of water supply planning decisions to streamflow and climate scenario uncertainties. Water Policy 1(3):321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sadler B (2000) Informed adaptation to a changed climate state: Is south-western Australia a national canary? Report, Indian Ocean Climate Initiative, Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Shapiro S, Wilk M (1976) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 53(3/4):591–611Google Scholar
  25. Shukla J, Marx L, Paolino D, Straus D, Anderson J, Ploshay J, Baumhefner D, Tribbia J, Brankovic C, Palmer T, Chang Y, Schubert S, Suarez M, Kalnay E (2000). Dynamical seasonal prediction. Bull Amer Met Soc 81(11):2593–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simmonds I, Keay K (2000) Variability of southern hemisphere extratropical cyclone behavior, 1958–1997. J Clim 13:550–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Watkins A (2006) Australia 2005 climate summary. Bull Aust Met Ocn Soc 19(1):5–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • James S. Risbey
    • 1
  • Kais Hamza
    • 2
  • John S. Marsden
    • 3
  1. 1.CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric ResearchHobartAustralia
  2. 2.School of Mathematical SciencesMonash UniversityMonashAustralia
  3. 3.Marsden Jacob AssociatesKewAustralia

Personalised recommendations