Water Resources Management

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 801–819

Drought forecasting using the Standardized Precipitation Index

  • A. Cancelliere
  • G. Di Mauro
  • B. Bonaccorso
  • G. Rossi
Original Article

Abstract

Unlike other natural disasters, drought events evolve slowly in time and their impacts generally span a long period of time. Such features do make possible a more effective drought mitigation of the most adverse effects, provided a timely monitoring of an incoming drought is available.

Among the several proposed drought monitoring indices, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) has found widespread application for describing and comparing droughts among different time periods and regions with different climatic conditions. However, limited efforts have been made to analyze the role of the SPI for drought forecasting.

The aim of the paper is to provide two methodologies for the seasonal forecasting of SPI, under the hypothesis of uncorrelated and normally distributed monthly precipitation aggregated at various time scales k. In the first methodology, the auto-covariance matrix of SPI values is analytically derived, as a function of the statistics of the underlying monthly precipitation process, in order to compute the transition probabilities from a current drought condition to another in the future. The proposed analytical approach appears particularly valuable from a practical stand point in light of the difficulties of applying a frequency approach due to the limited number of transitions generally observed even on relatively long SPI records. Also, an analysis of the applicability of a Markov chain model has revealed the inadequacy of such an approach, since it leads to significant errors in the transition probability as shown in the paper. In the second methodology, SPI forecasts at a generic time horizon M are analytically determined, in terms of conditional expectation, as a function of past values of monthly precipitation. Forecasting accuracy is estimated through an expression of the Mean Square Error, which allows one to derive confidence intervals of prediction. Validation of the derived expressions is carried out by comparing theoretical forecasts and observed SPI values by means of a moving window technique. Results seem to confirm the reliability of the proposed methodologies, which therefore can find useful application within a drought monitoring system.

Keywords

Drought Precipitation SPI Stochastic techniques Transition probabilities Forecast 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonaccorso B, Bordi I, Cancelliere A, Rossi G, Sutera A (2003) Spatial variability of drought: an analysis of SPI in Sicily. Water Resour Manag 17:273–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordi I, Fraedrich K, Petitta M, Sutera A (2005) Methods for predicting drought occurrences. In: Proc. of the 6th international conference of the European water resources association Menton, France, pp 7–10 September 2005Google Scholar
  3. Bremaud P (1999) Markov chains, Gibbs fields, Montecarlo simulation and queues, Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (1996) Introduction to time series and forecasting Springer-Verlag ed., New York, pp 1–422Google Scholar
  5. Cancelliere A, Di Mauro G, Bonaccorso B, Rossi G (2005) Stochastic forecasting of standardized precipitation index. Proc. of XXXI IAHR Congress “Water engineering for the future: choice and challenges”. Seoul, Korea, 11–16 September 2005, pp 3252–3260Google Scholar
  6. Cancelliere A, Rossi G, Ancarani A (1996) Use of Palmer Index as drought indicator in Mediterranean regions. Proc. IAHR Congress “From flood to drought”. Sun City, South Africa, August 5–7, 1996, S4.12–1–25Google Scholar
  7. Guttman NB, (1998) Comparing the Palmer drought severity index and the standardized precipitation Index. J Amer Water Res Ass 34(1):113–121Google Scholar
  8. Guttman NB (1999) Accepting the standardized precipitation index: a calculating algorithm. J Amer Water Res Ass 35(2):311–323Google Scholar
  9. Hayes MJ, Svoboda M, Wilhite DA, Vanyarkho O (1999) Monitoring the 1996 drought using the SPI. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 80:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heim RR (2000) Drought indices: a review. In: DA Wilhite (ed) Drought: a global assessment. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Karl T, Quinlan F, Ezell DS (1986) Drought termination and amelioration: its climatological probability. J Climate Appl Meteor 26:1198–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keyantash J, Dracup JA (2002) The quantification of drought: an evaluation of drought indices. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 83(8):1167–1180Google Scholar
  13. Klemes V (1986) Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrol Sci J 31(1):13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lohani VK, Loganathan GV, Mostaghimi S (1998) Long-term analysis and short-term forecasting of dry spells by Palmer drought severity index. Nord Hydrol 29(1):21–40Google Scholar
  15. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Proc. 8th conference on applied climatology. Anaheim, California, pp 179–184Google Scholar
  16. Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes E (1974) Introduction to the theory of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Rossi G, Cancelliere A (2002) Early warning of drought: development of a drought bullettin for Sicily. Proc. 2nd international conference “New trends in water and environmental engineering for safety and life: eco-compatible solutions for aquatic environments”. Capri, Italy, June 24–28, 2002, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  18. Rossi G (2003) Requisites for a drought watch system. In: G. Rossi et~al. (ed), tools for drought mitigation in Mediterranean regions. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, pp 147–157Google Scholar
  19. Schervish MJ (1984) Algorithm AS 195. Multivariate normal probabilities with error bound. Applied Statistics 33(1):81–94Google Scholar
  20. Wilhite DA, Hayes MJ, Svoboda MD (2000) Drought monitoring and assessment: status and trends in the United States. In: Vogt JV, Somma F (eds) Drought and drought mitigation in Europe. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 149–160Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cancelliere
    • 1
  • G. Di Mauro
    • 1
  • B. Bonaccorso
    • 1
  • G. Rossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations