Water Resources Management

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 111–128

Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales

Original Article


To be operationally sustainable, any system of environmental management needs to be based on a truly holistic assessment of all of the relevant factors influencing it. This is of course a daunting task, demanding as it does detailed and reliable data, not only from both the physical and social sciences, but also incorporating some representation of that part of knowledge which could be described as non-scientific. This could be said to include the uncertainties of market forces and political will, as well as traditional knowledge systems, and artistic representation. Recognising the limitations of our own knowledge system is important if we are to make progress in the achievement of sustainability. The development of less deterministic models is a step forward in that direction.

This paper provides some discussion on the challenges associated with the integration of data from different disciplines, and the application of that data at different scales. Alternative approaches to the assessment of water resources for policy making are highlighted, and the validity of using such assessments at different scales is discussed. Using the Water Poverty Index as illustration, examples are provided of how an integrated assessment framework can be used to provide consistency and transparency in decision-making, and how this can, in practice, be applied at a variety of scales.


Integration Indicators Water resources Water Poverty Index (WPI) Water management Spatial scale Poverty 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acreman M, King J (2002) Defining the Ecosystem Component of a Water Poverty Index. In: Sullivan CA, Meigh, JR and Fediw T (eds) Developing and testing the Water Poverty Index: Phase 1 Final Report. Report to DFID, CEH Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad QK (2003) Towards poverty alleviation: the water sector perspectives. Int J Water Resour Dev 19(2):263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcamo J, Döll P, Kaspar F, Siebert S (1997) Global change and global scenarios of water use and availability: An application of WaterGAP1.0. CESR, University of KasselGoogle Scholar
  4. Alcamo J, Doll P, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rosch T, Siebert S (2003) Global estimates of water withdrawals and availability under current and future ``business-as-usual'' conditions. Hydrol Sci J–Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques 48(3):339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnell NW, King R (1998) Implications of climate change for global water resources. Report to Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions by Department of Geography, University of Southampton, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker JL, Grosch ME (1994) Measuring the Effects of Geographic Targeting on Poverty Reduction Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper 99, World BankGoogle Scholar
  7. Batchelor C, Lovell C, Murata M (1996) Simple microirrigation techniques for improving irrigation efficiency on vegetable gardens. Agricultural Water Management 32(1):37–48(12)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradbury RH (1996). Are indicators yesterday's news? Institute of Environmental Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell BM, Jeffrey S, Kozanayi W, Luckert M, Mutamba M, Zindi C (2002) Household Livelihoods in Semi-Arid Regions: Options and Constraints. CIFOR, BogorGoogle Scholar
  10. Carney D (ed.) (1998) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contribution Can We Make? Department for International Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke MJ (1997) Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development. Edited by Urbanska, Webb, and Edwards. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Crenshaw EM, Christenson M, Oakey DR (2000) Demographic transition in ecological focus. Am Sociol Rev 65(3):371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cullis J (2002) Targeting the Water-poor through Water Poverty Mapping. A Case Study using Census Data and the Water Poverty Index for the Estcourt Municipal District, South Africa. MSc. Dissertation Oxford University, Environmental Change InstituteGoogle Scholar
  14. Cullis J, O'Regan DP (2004) Targeting the water-poor through water poverty mapping. Water Policy 6:397–411Google Scholar
  15. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) (2002) Proposed First Edition of the National Water Resource Strategy DWAF, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  16. Dube O (2003) The Water Poverty Index in arid regions: The Study of the Nata River basin (the Makgadikgadi salt pans catchment area) in Bulilima district : Zimbabwe-Botswana. M.Sc Dissertation, University of LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekins P, Simon S (1999) The sustainability gap: a practical indicator of sustainability in the framework of the national accounts. Int J Sustainable Dev 2:24–58Google Scholar
  18. Escamilla M, Kurtycz A, van der Heim R (2003) Water participation for poverty alleviation – the case of Meseta Purepecha, Mexico. Water Sci Technol 47(6):145–148Google Scholar
  19. Falkenmark M (1989) The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa – why isn't it being addressed. Ambio 18:112–118Google Scholar
  20. Feitelson E, Chenoweth J (2002) Water poverty: towards a meaningful indicator. Water Policy 4:263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gill R (1996) An integrated social fabric matrix/system dynamics approach to policy analysis. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleick P (2000) The World's Water 2000–2001: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources, Island Press, Oakland, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Greiner R (2004) Systems framework for regional-scale integrated modelling and assessment. Math Comput Simulat 64(1):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gurnell AM, Montgomery DR (eds.) (1999) Hydrological Applications of GIS. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, Bryant D, Woodward R (1995) Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development World Resources Institute, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris G (2002) Integrated assessment and modelling: an essential way of doing science. Environ Model Softw 17(3):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffman and Hoffman Ltd (2002) Water Poverty Index Media Usage Report. World Water Council, MarseillesGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoon P, Singh N, Wanmali SS (1997) Sustainable livelihoods: Concepts, Principles and Approaches to Indicator Development. UNDP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Huby M (2001) The sustainable use of resources on a global scale. Social Policy Adm 35(5):521–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development) (1999). Beyond delusion: a science and policy dialogue on designing effective indicators for sustainable developmentGoogle Scholar
  31. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001). Climate Change 2001: the Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson N, Giacomello AM, Sullivan CA, O'Regan D (2004) Managing watersheds for a better future. Research report to DFID, CEH, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Jewitt G (2002) Can integrated water resources management sustain the provision of ecosystem goods and services? Phys Chem Earth 27(11–22):887–895Google Scholar
  34. Kammerbauer J, Cordoba B, Escolan R, Flores S, Ramirez V, Zeledon J (2001) Identification of development indicators in tropical mountainous regions and some implications for natural resource policy designs: an integrated community case study. Ecol Econ 36(1):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuznets S (1973) Modern Economic Growth: findings and Reflections. Am Econ Rev 63:247–258Google Scholar
  36. Lambin EF (1997) Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Prog Phys Geogr 21(3):375–393Google Scholar
  37. Lawrence P, Meigh JR, Sullivan CA (2002) The Water Poverty Index: an international comparison. In: Sullivan CA, Meigh JR, Fediw T (eds) Developing and testing the Water Poverty Index: Phase 1 Final Report. Report to DFID, CEH, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Mallawaarachchi T, Walker PA, Young MD, Smyth RE, Lynch HS, Dudgeon G (1996) GIS-based integrated modelling systems for natural resource management. Agricult Syst 50(2):169–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meigh JR, McKenzie AA, Sene KJ (1999) A grid-based approach to water scarcity estimates for eastern and southern Africa. Water Resour Manage 13:85–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Merz J (2003). Water balances, floods and sediment transport in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas – Data analyses, modeling and comparison of selected mesoscale catchments. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Bern: Department of Geography, University of BernGoogle Scholar
  41. Meybeck M (2003) Earth Systems and Global Water Systems: Linkages and feedbacks. Philosophical transactions. Royal Academy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Midgley DC, Pitman WV, Middleton BJ (1994) Surface Water Resources of South Africa 1990. Reports 298/1/94 to 298/6/94, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  43. Molle F, Mollinga P (2003) Water poverty indicators. Conceptual problems and policy issues. Water Policy 5:529–544Google Scholar
  44. Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces – riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Naiman RJ, Bunn SE, Nilsson C, Petts GE, Pinay G, Thompson LC (2002) Legitimizing fluvial systems as users of water: an overview. Environ Manage 30:455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nur Y, Fazi S, Wirjoatmodjo N, Han Q (2001) Towards wise coastal management practice in a tropical megacity. Jakarta Ocean Coastal Manage 44(5–6):335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards Sustainability in the Water Sector: The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64:394–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Island Press, Washington DC, 253 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Rees W (1996) Revisiting carrying capacity: area based indicators of sustainability. Popul Environ: A J Interdiscip Stud 34(10):1667–1679Google Scholar
  50. Reynolds CS (1998) The state of freshwater ecology. Freshwater Biol 39:741–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biol 13:220–222Google Scholar
  52. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP (1997) How much water does a river need. Freshwater Biol 37:231–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruben R, Moll H, Kuyvenhoven A (1998) Integrating agricultural research and policy analysis: Analytical framework and policy applications for bio-economic modelling. Agric Syst 58(3):331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salameh E (2000) Redefining the Water Poverty Index. Water Int 25:469–473.Google Scholar
  55. Saleth RM, Samad M, Molden D, Hussain I (2003) Water, poverty and gender: an overview of issues and policies. Water Policy 5:5Google Scholar
  56. Samal PK, Palni LMS, Agrawal DK (2003) Ecology, ecological poverty and sustainable development in Central Himalayan region of India. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol 10(2):157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Satterthwaite D (2003) The links between poverty and the environment in urban areas of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 590:73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schulze RE, Dlamini DJM (2002) Mesoscale Indicators of Water Poverty in the Thukela Catchment, South Africa, under baseline land cover conditions Appendix 9.14 toGoogle Scholar
  59. Schulze RE (1999) Transcending scales of space and time in impact studies of climate and climate change on agrohydrological responses. Paper given at the GCTE Focus 3 Conference on Food and Forestry – Global Change and Global Challenges. Reading, Sept. 1999Google Scholar
  60. Scoones I (1998) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: a Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  61. Seckler D, Amarasinghe U, Molden D, De Silva R, Barker R (1998). World water demand and supply, 1990 to 2025: Scenarios and issues. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI. vi, 40pGoogle Scholar
  62. Sen AK (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  63. Sen AK (1999) Development as Freedom. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  64. Sengupta RR, Bennett DA (2003) Agent-based modelling environment for spatial decision support. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17(2):157–180Google Scholar
  65. Soussan J (2004) Water and Poverty. Fighting Poverty through Water Management. ADB. ManilaGoogle Scholar
  66. Srinivasan TN (1994) Human Development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel?, American Economic Review, MayGoogle Scholar
  67. Stern DI, Common M, Barbier E (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 24:1151–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Streeten PP (1994) Human development: means and ends. Am Econ Rev 84:232–237Google Scholar
  69. Streeten PP (1996) Human Development – the Debate about the Index. Int J Soc SciGoogle Scholar
  70. Sullivan CA, Meigh JR (2003) The Water Poverty Index: its role in the context of poverty alleviation. Water Policy, 5:5. Oct 2003Google Scholar
  71. Sullivan CA (2001) The potential for calculating a meaningful Water Poverty Index. Water Int 26:471–480Google Scholar
  72. Sullivan CA (2002) Calculating a Water Poverty Index. World Dev 30:1195–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sullivan CA, Meigh JR and Fediw T (2002) Developing and testing the Water Poverty Index: Phase 1 Final Report. Report to DFID, CEH, UKGoogle Scholar
  74. Sullivan CA, Meigh JR, Giacomello AM, Fediw T, Lawrence P, Samad M, Mlote S, Hutton C, Allan JA, Schulze RE, Dlamini DJM, Cosgrove W, Delli Priscoli J, Gleick P, Smout I, Cobbing J, Calow R, Hunt C, Hussain A, Acreman MC, King J, Malomo S, Tate EL, O'Regan D, Milner S, Steyl I (2003) The Water Poverty Index: development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, in pressGoogle Scholar
  75. Sullivan CA, Mutamba M, Kozanayi W (2001) Water Use and Livelihood Security: A Study of Rural Households in Southern Zimbabwe. CEH report to DFIDGoogle Scholar
  76. Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turner RK van den Bergh JCJM, Soderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Maltby E, van Ierland EC (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35(1):7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1999) Human Development Report 1999. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2001) Human Development Report 2003, Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2003) World Water Development Report. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Tongeren F, Van Meijl H, Surry Y (2001) Global models applied to agricultural and trade policies: a review and assessment. Agric Econ 26(2):149–172Google Scholar
  82. Vanvoris P, Millard W D, Thomas J, Urban D (1993) Terra – Vision – The Integration of Scientific Analysis Into The Decision-Making Process. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 7(2):143–164Google Scholar
  83. Wallace JS, Acreman MC, Sullivan CA (2003) The sharing of water between society and ecosystems: from advocacy to catchment based co-management. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Dec 2003 pp 513–528Google Scholar
  84. World Bank (2001) World Bank: 2001, World development indicators 2001, CD-ROM, World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  85. World Commission on Dams (WCD) (2000) Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. Report of the World Commission on DamsGoogle Scholar
  86. World Economic Forum, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, and Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University (2001) Environmental Sustainability Index (http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/indicators/ESI), January 2001Google Scholar
  87. World Resources Institute (2000) World Resources Institute: 2000, World Resources 2000–2001–People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life, World Resources Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  88. WSSD (2002) World Summit on Sustainable Development, Plan of Implementation. Johannesburg; Sept. 2002Google Scholar
  89. Yoffe SB, Ward BS (1999) Water resources and indicators of conflict: A proposed spatial analysis. Water Int 24(4):377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and HydrologyWallingfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations