Skip to main content
Log in

An Intelligent Decision Support System for Management of Floods

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrating human knowledge with modeling tools, an intelligent decision support system (DSS) is developed to assist decision makers during different phases of flood management. The DSS is developed as a virtual planning tool and can address both engineering and non-engineering issues related to flood management. Different models (hydrodynamic, forecasting, and economic) that are part of the DSS share data and communicate with each other by providing feedback. The DSS is able to assist in: selecting suitable flood damage reduction options (using an expert system approach); forecasting floods (using artificial neural networks approach); modeling the operation of flood control structures; and describing the impacts (area flooded and damage) of floods in time and space. The proposed DSS is implemented for the Red River Basin in Manitoba, Canada. The results from the test application of DSS for 1997 flood in the Red River Basin are very promising. The DSS is able to predict the peak flows with 2% error and reveals that with revised operating rules the contribution of Assiniboine River to the flooding of Winnipeg city can be significantly reduced. The decision support environment allows a number of “what-if” type questions to be asked and answered, thus, multiple decisions can be tried without having to deal with the real life consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, S. and Simonovic, S. P., 2000, ‘Modeling reservoir operations using system dynamics’, ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 14(3), 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S. and Simonovic, S. P., 2001a, ‘A decision support tool for evaluation of impacts of flood management policies’, Journal of Hydrological Science and Technology 17(1–4), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S. and Simonovic, S. P., 2001b, ‘Integration of heuristic knowledge with analytical tools for selection of flood control measures’, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 28(2), 208–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S. and Simonovic, S. P., 2004, ‘Spatial system dynamics: A new approach for simulation of water resources systemsE’, ASC Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 18(4), 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S. and Simonovic, S. P., 2005, ‘An Artificial Neural Network model for generating hydrograph from hydro-meteorological parameters’, Journal of Hydrology (in press).

  • ASCE Task Committee: 2000, ‘Artificial neural networks in hydrology II: Hydrologic applications’, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 5(2), 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, M. J. and Simonovic, S. P., 1994, ‘Decision-support system for long-range stream flow forecasting’, ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 8(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, M. J. and Simonovic, S. P., 2000, ‘A Systems Approach for collaborative decision support in water resources planning’, International Journal of Technology Management 19(3/4/5), 546–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Câmara, A. S., 1990, ‘Decision Support System for estuarine water-quality management’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 116(3), 417–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriere, P., Mohaghegh, S., and Gaskari, R., 1996, ‘Performance of a virtual runoff hydrograph system’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management ASCE 122(6), 421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. J., Kleopa, X. A., and Teoh, C. B., 1996, ‘Development of an expert system for daily drought monitoring’, ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 10(1), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimflex Teknowledge Corporation: 1991, M.4 User Guide, California, USA.

  • Davis, J. R., Nanninga, P. M., Biggins, J., and Laut, P., 1991, ‘Prototype decision support system for analyzing impact of catchment policies’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 117(4), 399–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R. R. and Tierney K. J. (eds.) 1994, Disasters, Collective Behavior, and Social Organization, University of Delaware Press, Newark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. W., 1998, Response to Disaster : Fact Versus Fiction & Its Perpetuation: The Sociology of Disaster, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. T. and Killen, J. R., 1995, ‘PC-Based decision-support system for Trinity river, Texas’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 121(5), 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guariso, G. and Werthner, H., 1989, Environmental Decision Support Systems, Ellis Horwood Ltd., England.

    Google Scholar 

  • HPS Inc., 2001, Tutorial and Technical Documentation STELLA? II, Hanover, NH.

  • IJC, 1997, International Joint Commission, Red River flooding: Short-term measures. Interim Report of the International Red River Basin Task Force, Ottawa, Washington.

  • Keyes, A. M. and Palmer, R. N., 1993, ‘Development of a decision support system for the prioritization of multimedia dischargers’, Journal of Environmental Management 601–612.

  • KGS, 2000, ‘Red River basin stage-damage curves update and preparation of flood damage maps’, Report submitted to Int. Joint Commission, Ottawa, Washington DC.

  • Mallach, E. G., 1994, Understanding Decision Support Systems and Expert Systems, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, D. C., Maidment, D. R. and Tanriverdi, M., 1993, ‘Expert geographic information system for Texas water planning’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 119(2), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muttiah, R. S., Srinivasan, R., and Allen, P. M., 1997, ‘Prediction of two-year peak stream discharges using neural networks’, Journral of American Water Resources Assoc. 33(3), 625–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. N. and Tull, R. M., 1987, ‘Expert system for drought management planning’, ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 1(4), 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. N. and Holmes, K. J., 1988, ‘Operational guidance during droughts: An expert system approach’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 114(6), 647–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission: 1958, ‘Report on Flood Cost Benefit’, Winnipeg, Manitoba.

  • Simonovic, S. P., 1992, ‘Reservoir systems analysis: Closing gap between theory and practice’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 118(3), 262–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S. P., 1996a, ‘Decision support systems for sustainable management of water resources. 1. General Principles’, Water International 21(4), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S. P., 1996b, ‘Decision support systems for sustainable management of water resources. 2. Case Studies’, Water International 21(4), 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S. P., 1999a, ‘Decision support system for flood management in the Red River Basin’, Canadian Water Resources Journal 24(3), 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S. P., 1999b, ‘Decision support system for flood management in the Red River Basin’, Report to the Int. Joint Commission Red River Basin Task Force, Ottawa, Washington D.C.

  • Simonovic, S. P. and Ahmad, S., 2005, ‘Computer-based model for flood evacuation emergency planning’, Natural Hazards 34(1), 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. and Eli, R. N. 1995, ‘Neural-network models of rainfall-runoff process’, ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 121(6), 499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierauf, R. J., 1988, User Oriented Decision Support Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: 1998a, HEC-RAS: River Analysis System, Reference Manual, CPD-69, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: 1998b, HEC-FDA: Flood Damage Reduction Analysis, User's Manual, CPD-72, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warkentin, A. A., 1999, ‘Red river at Winnipeg: Hydro-meteorological parameter generated floods for design purposes’, Proceedings of the Canadian Water Resources Association Winnipeg Conference: Red River Flooding — Decreasing Our Risks; Winnipeg, MB. 32 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajjad Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, S., Simonovic, S.P. An Intelligent Decision Support System for Management of Floods. Water Resour Manage 20, 391–410 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-0326-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-0326-3

Key words

Navigation