Water Resources Management

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 643–660

An Improved IaS Relation Incorporating Antecedent Moisture in SCS-CN Methodology

  • S. K. Mishra
  • R. K. Sahu
  • T. I. Eldho
  • M. K. Jain
Article

Abstract

Employing a large dataset of 84 small watersheds (area = 0.17 to 71.99 ha) of U.S.A., this paper investigates a number of initial abstraction (Ia)-potential maximum retention (S) relations incorporating antecedent moisture (M) as a function of antecedent precipitation (P5), and finally suggests an improved relation for use in the popular Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) methodology for determination of direct runoff from given rainfall. The improved performance of the incorporated M = α \(sqrt{P_5S}\) and Ia = λ S2/(S + M) relations, where λ is the initial abstraction coefficient, in the SCS-CN methodology exhibits the dependence of Ia on M, which is close to reality; the larger the M, the lesser will be Ia, and vice versa. Such incorporation obviates sudden jumps in the curve number variation with antecedent moisture condition, an unreasonable and undesirable feature of the existing SCS-CN model.

Key words

antecedent moisture curve number initial abstraction NEH-4 soil conservation service 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gumbel, E. J., 1954, ‘Statistical theory of extreme values and some practical applications’, Nat. Bureau. Stand., Applied mathematics series 33.Google Scholar
  2. Hawkins, R. H., Woodward, D. E., and Jiang, R., 2001, Investigation of the runoff curve number abstraction ratio, Paper presented at USDA-NRCS Hydraulic Engineering Workshop, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  3. Hjelmfelt, A. T. Jr., Kramer, K. A., and Burwell, R. E., 1982, ‘Curve numbers as random variables’, in V. P. Singh (ed.), Proc. Int. Symp. on Rainfall-Runoff Modelling, Water Resources Publication, Littleton, Colo, pp 365–373.Google Scholar
  4. Itenfisu, D., Elliott, R. L., Allen, R. G., and Walter, I. A., 2003, ‘Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculations as part of the ASCE standardization effort’, J. Irrigation & Drainage Engg., ASCE 129(6), 440–448.Google Scholar
  5. Levenberg, K., 1944, ‘A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares’, Quart. Appl. Math. 2, 164–168.Google Scholar
  6. Madsen, H., Wilson, G., and Ammentorp, H. C., 2002, ‘Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models’, J. Hydrology 261, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marquardt, D. W., 1963, ‘An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters’, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 11(2), 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCuen, R. H., 1982, A Guide to Hydrologic Analysis Using SCS Methods, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632.Google Scholar
  9. Mishra, S. K. and Singh, V. P., 2002, ‘SCS-CN-based hydrologic simulation package, Ch. 13’, in V. P. Singh and D. K. Frevert (eds), Mathematical Models in Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, Water Resources Publications, P.O. Box 2841, Littleton, Colorado 80161, pp. 391–464.Google Scholar
  10. Mishra, S. K. and Singh, V. P., 2003, ‘Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology’, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN 1-4020-1132-6.Google Scholar
  11. Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., Pandey, R. P., and Singh, V. P., 2003, ‘Evaluation of AMC-dependant SCS-CN-based models using large data of small watersheds’, Water and Energy Int. 60(3), 13–23.Google Scholar
  12. Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., and Singh, V. P., 2004, ‘Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture’, J. Water Resour. Management 18, 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mishra, S. K., Jain, M. K., Pandey, R. P., and Singh, V. P., 2005, ‘Catchment area-based evaluation of the AMC-dependent SCS-CN-inspired rainfall-runoff models’, J. Hydrological Processes 19(14), 2701–2718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ponce, V. M. and Hawkins, R. H., 1996, ‘Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?’, J. Hydrol. Engrg., ASCE 1(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  15. SCS, 1956, 1971, Hydrology, National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4, Chapter 10, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. Weibull, W., 1939, ‘A Statistical Theory of the Strength of Materials’, Proceedings of the Royal Swedish Institute of Engineering Research, Stockholm, No. 151, pp 1–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Mishra
    • 1
  • R. K. Sahu
    • 2
  • T. I. Eldho
    • 2
  • M. K. Jain
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Water Resources Development and ManagementIndian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.National Institute of HydrologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations