Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 693–712 | Cite as

A Model for Optimal Allocation of Water to Competing Demands

  • M. S. BabelEmail author
  • A. Das Gupta
  • D. K. Nayak
Article

Abstract

The present study develops a simple interactive integrated water allocation model (IWAM), which can assist the planners and decision makers in optimal allocation of limited water from a storage reservoir to different user sectors, considering socio-economic, environmental and technical aspects. IWAM comprises three modules—a reservoir operation module (ROM), an economic analysis module (EAM) and a water allocation module (WAM). The model can optimize the water allocation with any of two different objectives or two objectives together. The two individual objectives included in the model are the maximization of satisfaction and the maximization of net economic benefit by the demand sectors. Weighting technique (WT) or simultaneous compromise constraint (SICCON) technique is used to convert the multi-objective decision-making problem into a single objective function. The single objective functions are optimized using linear programming. The model applicability is demonstrated for various cases with a hypothetical example.

Keywords

multi-objective decision-making net economic return optimization reservoir operation simultaneous compromise constraint technique water allocation weighting technique 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, N., 1995, ‘Value of moving from central planning to a market system: Lessons from the Israeli water sector’, Agric. Econ. 12(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bielsa, J. and Duarte, R., 2001, ‘An economic model for water allocation in north eastern Spain’, Water Res. Dev. 17(3), 397–410.Google Scholar
  3. Diaz, G. E., Brown, T. C., and Sveinsson, O., 2000, Aquarius: A Modeling System for River Basin Water Allocation, General Technical Report RM-GTR-299-Revised, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Services, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/program/mis/meth/aquarius.pdf on 12 August 2004.
  4. Doupe, R. G. and Pettit, N. E., 2002, ‘Ecological perspectives on regulation and water allocation for the Ord River, Western Australia’, River Res. Appl. 18(3), 307–320. Retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/93520263/STRAT on 12 August 2004.
  5. Green, G. P. and Hamilton, J. R., 2000, ‘Water Allocation, Transfers and Conservation: Links between Policy and Hydrology’, Water Res. Dev. 16(2), 197–208.Google Scholar
  6. Huffaker, R., Whittleysey, N., and Hamilton, J. R., 2000, ‘The role of prior appropriation in allocating water resources into the 21st century’, Water Res. Dev. 16(2), 265–273.Google Scholar
  7. McKinney, D. C. and Cai, X., 2002, ‘Multiobjective Optimization Model for Water Allocation in the Aral Sea Basin: Stochastic Optimization’, Draft Working Paper, Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Program, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  8. Nayak, D. K., 2003, ‘Modelling Water Allocation in Competing Demand’, Master's thesis, Water Engineering and Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  9. Quba′a, R., El-Fadel, M., and Darwish, M. R., 2002, ‘Water pricing for multisectoral allocation: A case study’, Water Res. Dev. 18(4), 523–544.Google Scholar
  10. Reca, J., Roldan, J., Alcaide, M., and Camacho, E., 2001, ‘Optimization model for water allocation in deficit irrigation system: I. Description of the model’, Agric. Water Manage. 48(2), 103– 116.Google Scholar
  11. Reid, M. A. and Brooks, J. J., 2000, ‘Detecting Effects of Environmental Water Allocations in Wetlands of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia’, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16(5), 479–496. Retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/73501955/START on12 August 2004.
  12. Ringler, C., 2001, ‘Optimal Water Allocation in the Mekong River Basin’, ZEF-Discussion Papers on Development Policy No. 38, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, pp. 50.Google Scholar
  13. Rosegrant, M. W., Schleyer, R. G., and Yadav, S. N., 1995, ‘Water policy for efficient agricultural diversification: Market-based approaches’, Food Policy 20(3), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Salman, A. Z., Al-Karablieh, E. K., and Fisher, F. M., 2001, ‘An inter-seasonal agricultural water allocation system (SAWAS)’, Agric. Systems 68(3), 233–252.Google Scholar
  15. Tabucanon, M. T., 1976, ‘Multiobjective Linear Programming for Decision Making in Industrial Systems’, Ph.D. dissertation, Industrial Systems and Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  16. Voogt, K. D., Kite, G., Droogers, P., and Murray-Rust, H., 2000, ‘Modeling water allocation between a wetland and irrigated agriculture in the Gediz Basin, Turkey’, Water Res. Dev. 16(4), 639–650.Google Scholar
  17. Wardlaw, R. and Bhaktikul, K., 2001, ‘Application of generic algorithm for water allocation in an irrigation system’, Irrigation and Drainage 50(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water Engineering and ManagementSchool of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of TechnologyKlong LuangThailand

Personalised recommendations