Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus

, Volume 6, Issue 5–6, pp 443–451

Streambed Sediment Geochemical Controls on In-Stream Phosphorus Concentrations during Baseflow

  • Marcel van der Perk
  • Philip N. Owens
  • Lynda K. Deeks
  • Barry G. Rawlins
Article

Abstract

A spatially extensive geochemical data set of stream water and bed sediment composition across the Tamar catchment in south-west England was analysed to identify the key bed sediment properties that control the in-stream dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) concentrations during baseflow conditions. Linear regression analysis of the streamwater DRP concentrations and the distribution coefficient Kd for DRP revealed that the former is positively correlated with total SiO2 and Al2O3, and negatively correlated with K2O. The primary control on these major element distributions is the dominant bedrock geology. The data suggest that streamwater DRP concentrations are mainly controlled by adsorption to clay minerals. Where P concentrations in streamwater were considerably elevated by inputs from point sources, DRP concentrations are also controlled by precipitation of hydroxyapatite.

Keywords

bed sediments distribution coefficient England geochemistry major element chemistry phosphorus Tamar catchment 

References

  1. Fuller, R. M., Groom, G. B., & Jones, A. R. (1994). The land cover map of Great Britain: An automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, 553–562.Google Scholar
  2. Gardolinski, P., Hanrahan, G., Achterberg, E. P., Gledhill, M., Tappin, A. D., House, W. A., et al. (2001). Comparison of sample storage protocols for the determination of nutrients in natural waters. Water Research, 35, 3670–3678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heathwaite, A. L., & Dils, R. M. (2000). Characterising phosphorus loss in surface and subsurface hydrological pathways. Science of the Total Environment, 251252, 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jarvie, H. P., Jürgens, M. D., Williams, R. J., Neal, C., Davies, J. J. L., Barrett, C., et al. (2005). Role of river bed sediments as sources and sinks of phosphorus across two major eutrophic UK river basins: the Hampshire Avon and the Herefordshire Wye. Journal of Hydrology, 304, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Neal, C., House, W. A., Jarvie, H. P., Neal, M., Hill, L., & Wickham, H. (2005). Phosphorus concentrations in the River Dun, the Kennet and Avon Canal and the River Kennet, southern England. Science of the Total Environment, 344, 107–128.Google Scholar
  6. Owens, P. N., & Walling, D. E. (2002). The phosphorus content of fluvial sediment in rural and industrialized river basins. Water Research, 36, 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Parkhurst, D. L., & Appelo, C. A. J. (1999). User’s guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) – A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4259, 310 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Rawlins, B. G., O’Donnell, K., & Ingham, M. (2003). Geochemical survey of the Tamar catchment (south-west England). British Geological Survey Report CR/03/027, 232 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Tebbens, L. A., Veldkamp, A., & Kroonenberg, S. B. (2000). Natural compositional variation of the river Meuse (Maas) suspended load: A 13 ka bulk geochemical record from the upper Kreftenheye and Betuwe Formations in northern Limburg. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 79, 391–409.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel van der Perk
    • 1
  • Philip N. Owens
    • 2
  • Lynda K. Deeks
    • 2
  • Barry G. Rawlins
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical GeographyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.National Soil Resources InstituteCranfield UniversityOkehamptonUK
  3. 3.British Geological SurveyKeyworthUK

Personalised recommendations