Advertisement

The Density of Nonprofit Organizations: Beyond Community Diversity and Resource Availability

  • Joowon Jeong
  • Tracy Shicun CuiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the determinants of the density of nonprofits registered in the USA by using alternative measures of government services and community conditions to test government failure theory and interdependence theory. Specifically, we examined the relationship between governments and nonprofits in the fields of art, health, and human services, with an emphasis on the level of the provision of public services, the heterogeneous demands of populations, and for-profit service providers. We found that the size of government, measured as government wage and fiscal decentralization, was negatively associated with the density of nonprofits, while government fragmentation was positively related to the density of nonprofits. The heterogeneity of community populations tended to increase nonprofit density. Taken together, therefore, our results offer more support for the government failure theory than the interdependence theory. Also, our findings that for-profit service organizations were positively related to the density of nonprofits call for researchers to pay attention to nonprofit partners and competitors in future studies.

Keywords

Nonprofit density Heterogeneous demand Government fragmentation For-profit 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest, nor has this study received any funding. Additionally, the authors confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Hoxby, C. (2004). Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 348–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1996). Toward an institutional ecology of organizational founding. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1378–1427.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Ner, A., & Hoomissen, T. Van. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, nonprofit and government sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economy, 63(3), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bielefeld, W., & Murdoch, J. C. (2004). The locations of nonprofit organizations and their for-profit counterparts: An exploratory analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleveland, G., & Krashinsky, M. (2004). The quality gap: A study of nonprofit and commercial child care centres in Canada. Retrieved January 20, 2019 from http://www.peelearlyyears.com/pdf/Research/CANADA EARLY YEARS/.pdf.
  7. Corbin, J. J. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. da Costa, M. M. (2016). What influences the location of nonprofit organizations? A spatial analysis in Brazil. Voluntas, 27(3), 1064–1090.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, R. L., Wilsker, A., & Young, D. R. (2011). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: Does it relate to publicness? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 662–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fruttero, A., & Gauri, V. (2005). The strategic choices of NGOS: Location decisions in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies, 41(5), 759–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2001). Not-for-profit entrepreneurs. Journal of Public Economics, 81(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glanville, J. L., Paxton, P., & Wang, Y. (2015). Social capital and generosity: A multilevel analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3), 526–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gronbjerg, K. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Grønbjerg, K. A., & Paarlberg, L. (2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 684–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joassart-Marcelli, P., & Wolch, J. R. (2003). The intrametropolitan geography of poverty and the nonprofit sector in Southern California. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 70–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, M. (2015). Socioeconomic diversity, political engagement, and the density of nonprofit organizations in US counties. American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lecy, J. D., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2013). Nonprofit sector growth and density: Testing theories of government support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, G. (2017). Government decentralization and the size of the nonprofit sector: Revisiting the government failure theory. American Review of Public Administration, 47(6), 619–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu, J. (2017). Does population heterogeneity really matter to nonprofit sector size? Revisiting Weisbrod’s demand heterogeneity hypothesis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9915-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu, J., & Xu, C. (2018). Complementary or supplementary? The relationship between government size and nonprofit sector size. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(3), 454–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marquis, C., Davis, G. F., & Glynn, M. A. (2013). Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities nonprofit growth. Organization Science, 24, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsunaga, Y., & Yamauchi, N. (2004). Is the government failure theory still relevant? A panel analysis using US state level data. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(2), 227–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matsunaga, Y., Yamauchi, N., & Okuyama, N. (2010). What determines the size of the nonprofit sector? A cross-country analysis of the government failure theory. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow State. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peck, L. R. (2008). Do antipoverty nonprofits locate where people need them? Evidence from a spatial analysis of phoenix. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pennerstorfer, A., & Rutherford, A. C. (2019). Measuring growth of the nonprofit sector: The choice of indicator matters. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(2), 440–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986). Altruistic nonprofit firms in competitive markets: The case of day-care centers in the United States. Journal of Consumer Policy, 9(3), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16(1–2), 29–49.Google Scholar
  30. Salamon, L. M. (1999). The nonprofit sector at a crossroads: The case of America. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salamon, L. M. (2015). The resilient sector revisited (2nd ed.). Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  32. Saxton, G. D., & Benson, M. A. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, S. R., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Twombly, E. C. (2003). What factors affect the entry and exit of nonprofit human service organisations in metropolitan areas? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Puyvelde, S., & Brown, W. A. (2016). Determinants of nonprofit sector density: A stakeholder approach. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1045–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Slyke, D. M., & Lecy, J. D. (2012). Profiles of nonprofit startups and nonprofit entrepreneurs (No. 12–28). Retrieved from November 15, 2018 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2175676.
  37. Weisbrod, B. A. (1972). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. S. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality and economic theory (pp. 171–196). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). The nonprofit mission and its financing: Growing links between nonprofits and the rest of the economy. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Andrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations