Advertisement

Humanitarian Organizations in International Disaster Relief: Understanding the Linkage Between Donors and Recipient Countries

  • Jiuchang Wei
  • Ao Wang
  • Fei WangEmail author
Original Paper
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

This study explores how humanitarian organizations (HOs) link donors and recipients in a disaster relief coordination mechanism. Based on an analysis of real data collected from the financial tracking service, our results show that disaster assistance through the HO channel greatly exceeds the funding delivered by the non-HO channel. The severity of the disaster is positively correlated with the involvement of HOs. Disaster-stricken countries that belong to the Non-Aligned Movement receive more assistance through the HO channel. The recipients with less international trade may attract more HO-channel funding, but higher international tourism expenditures also may result in more HO-channel funding. We also found that the determinants of the disaster relief coordination path vary greatly in terms of trade openness, political regime, and geographic factors. Based on the analysis of the primary humanitarian relief supply chain, the results show that some countries prefer to donate through large international HOs (e.g., Japan and Canada), and other countries favor national level organizations (e.g., the UK and the USA). Finally, to improve the efficiency of international disaster relief, the paper suggests a coordination platform that involves the main donors, frequent recipients, HOs, and a Global Information Network that can assist in coordinating disaster relief activities.

Keywords

Humanitarian organization Disaster relief Donation Disaster coordination mechanism Natural disaster 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 71701198, 71921001 and 71828102), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2040160028).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agnewa, J. (2006). Religion and Geopolitics. Geopolitics,11, 183–191.Google Scholar
  2. Altay, N., Prasad, S., & Sounderpandian, J. (2009). Strategic planning for disaster relief logistics: Lessons from supply chain management. International Journal of Services Sciences,2(2), 142–161.Google Scholar
  3. Annen, K., & Strickland, S. (2017). Global samaritans? Donor election cycles and the allocation of humanitarian aid. European Economic Review,96, 38–47.Google Scholar
  4. Balcik, B., & Ak, D. (2014). Supplier selection for framework agreements in humanitarian relief. Production and Operations Management,23, 1028–1041.  https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., Krejci, C. C., Muramatsu, K. M., & Ramirez, M. (2010). Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics,126(1), 22–34.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, C., & Land, D. (2007). Geographies of generosity: Beyond the “moral turn”. Geoforum,38(6), 1065–1075.Google Scholar
  7. Beamon, B. M., & Balcik, B. (2008). Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. International Journal of Public Sector Management,21(1), 4–25.Google Scholar
  8. Becerra, O., Cavallo, E., & Noy, I. (2014). Foreign aid in the aftermath of large natural disasters. Review of Development Economics,18(3), 445–460.Google Scholar
  9. Bermeo, S. (2007). Utility maximization and strategic development: A model of foreign aid allocation. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  10. Berthélemy, J. C., & Tichit, A. (2004). Bilateral donors’ aid allocation decisions-a three-dimensional panel analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance,13(3), 253–274.Google Scholar
  11. Bui, T., Cho, S., Sankaran, S., & Sovereign, M. (2000). A framework for designing a global information network for multinational humanitarian assistance/disaster relief. Information System Frontiers,1(4), 427–442.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, N. (2007). Living through the tsunami: Vulnerability and generosity on a volatile Earth. Geoforum,38(6), 1127–1139.Google Scholar
  13. Cuaresma, J. C. (2010). Natural disasters and human capital accumulation. The World Bank Economic Review,24(2), 280–302.Google Scholar
  14. Drury, A. C., Olson, R. S., & Van Belle, D. (2005). The politics of humanitarian aid: U.S. foreign disaster assistance, 1964–1995. The Journal of Politics,67(2), 454–473.Google Scholar
  15. Fleck, R. K., & Kilby, C. (2010). Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the cold war to the war on terror. Journal of Development Economics,91, 185–197.Google Scholar
  16. Gatignon, A., Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Charles, A. (2010). The Yogyakarta earthquake: Humanitarian relief through IFRC’s decentralized supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics,126(1), 102–110.Google Scholar
  17. Hannigan, J. (2012). Disasters without borders: The international politics of natural disasters. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Holmes, J. (2008). Disaster lessons. Washington Post, August 6. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080502924.html.
  19. Kapacu, N. (2011). Collaborative governance in international disasters: Nargis cyclone in Myanmar and Sichuan earthquake in China cases. International Journal of Emergency Management,8(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  20. Kelman, I. (2007). Hurricane Katrina disaster diplomacy. Disasters,31, 288–309.Google Scholar
  21. Korf, B. (2007). Antinomies of generosity: Moral geographies and post-tsunami aid in Southeast Asia. Geoforum,38, 366–378.Google Scholar
  22. Kovács, G., & Spens, K. (2008). Chapter 13: Humanitarian logistics revisited. In J. S. Arlbjørn, A. Halldórsson, M. Jahre, & K. Spens (Eds.), Northern lights in logistics and supply chain management (pp. 217–232). Copenhagen: CBS Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kovács, G., & Spens, K. (2009). Identifying challenges in humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management,39(6), 506–528.Google Scholar
  24. Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Mechler, R., & Pflug, G. (2005). Refocusing disaster aid. Science,309(8), 1044–1046.Google Scholar
  25. Mak, H.-Y., Mallard, A. P., Bui, T., & Au, G. (1999). Building online crisis management support using workflow systems. Decision Support Systems,25(3), 209–224.Google Scholar
  26. Maxwell, D., Bailey, S., Harvey, P., Walker, P., Sharbatke-Church, C., & Savage, K. (2012). Preventing corruption in humanitarian assistance: Perceptions, gaps and challenges. Disasters,36(1), 140–160.Google Scholar
  27. McKinlay, R. D., & Little, R. (1979). The US aid relationship: A test of the recipient need and the donor interest model. Political Studies,2, 236–250.Google Scholar
  28. Moe, T. L., & Pathranarakul, P. (2006). An integrated approach to natural disaster management. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal,15(3), 396–413.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, S., Eng, E., & Daniel, M. (2003). International NGOs and the role of network centrality in humanitarian aid operations: A case study of coordination during the 2000 Mozambique floods. Disasters,27(4), 305–318.Google Scholar
  30. Oloruntoba, R., & Gray, R. (2006). Humanitarian aid: An agile supply chain? Supply Chain Management,11(2), 115–120.Google Scholar
  31. Olsen, G. R., Carstensen, N., & Høyen, K. (2003). Humanitarian crises: What determines the level of emergency assistance? Media coverage, donor interests and the aid business. Disasters,27, 109–126.Google Scholar
  32. Paul, B. K. (2019). Channeling disaster aid: Process and problems. In B. K. Paul (Ed.), Disaster relief aid (pp. 43–99). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Pedraza Martinez, A. J., Stapleton, O., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2010). Using OR to support humanitarian operations: Learning from the Haiti earthquake. In INSEAD working paper no. 2010/47/TOM/INSEAD social innovation centre. Retrieved March 15, 2016 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1634942.
  34. Pedraza Martinez, A. J., Stapleton, O., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2011). Field vehicle fleet management in humanitarian operations: a case-based approach. Journal of Operations Management,29(5), 404–421.Google Scholar
  35. Pedraza Martinez, A. J., Stapleton, O., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). On the use of evidence in humanitarian logistics research. Disasters,37(s1), S51–S67.Google Scholar
  36. Pelling, M. (2002). Assessing urban vulnerability and social adaptation to risk: Evidence from Santo Domingo’. International Development Planning Review,24(1), 59–76.Google Scholar
  37. Raschky, P. A., & Schwindt, M. (2012). On the channel and type of aid: The case of international disaster assistance. European Journal of Political Economy,28(1), 119–131.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, S., Ottoni-Wilhelm, M., & Scharf, K. (2017). The donation response to natural disasters (No. 17/688). Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  39. Tomasini, R. M., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). From preparedness to partnerships: Case study research on humanitarian logistics. International Transactions in Operational Research,16(5), 549–559.Google Scholar
  40. Transparency International. (2010). Preventing corruption in humanitarian operations. Retrieved September 8, 2016 from http://www.ifrc.org/docs/IDRL/2010_HandbookHumanitarianOperations_EN.pdf.
  41. Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society,57(5), 475–489.Google Scholar
  42. Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Pedraza Martinez, A. J. (2012). Using OR to adapt supply chain management best practices to humanitarian logistics. International Transactions in Operational Research,19(1–2), 307–322.Google Scholar
  43. Wedel, J. R. (2005). U.S. foreign aid and foreign policy: Building strong relationships by doing it right! International Studies Perspectives,6, 35–50.Google Scholar
  44. Wei, J., & Marinova, D. (2016). The orientation of disaster donations: Differences in the global response to five major earthquakes. Disasters,40(3), 452–475.Google Scholar
  45. Wei, J., Marinova, D., & Zhao, D. (2014). Disaster assistance: Determinants of countries around the world contributing towards disaster donations. International Journal of Emergency Management,10(1), 48–66.Google Scholar
  46. Wei, J., Zhao, D., & Liang, L. (2009). Estimating the growth models of news stories on disasters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(9), 1741–1755.Google Scholar
  47. Zagefka, H., & James, T. (2015). The psychology of charitable donations to disaster victims and beyond. Social Issues and Policy Review,9(1), 155–192.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.International School of Business and FinanceSun Yat-sen UniversityZhuhaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations