Advertisement

Civil Society Organizations: the Site of Legitimizing the Common Good—a Literature Review

  • Liv EgholmEmail author
  • Liesbet Heyse
  • Damien Mourey
Original Paper

Abstract

The concept of legitimacy—i.e., being regarded as “lawful, admissible, and justified” (Edwards in NGO rights and responsibilities: a new deal for global governance, The Foreign Policy Center, London, 2000)—is pivotal within civil society research. Recently, the concept has applied to wider notions concerning the civil sphere and civic action. The introductory article of this special issue aims to provide an overview of conceptualizations of legitimacy within civil society research and to point at new avenues for future research. We depart from Suddaby et al.’s (Acad Manag Ann 11(1):451–478, 2017) configurations of legitimacy within management literature: as property, perception, and process. While these configurations are also reflected in civil society literature, with legitimacy as property being prominent, they do not capture the full scope of civil society literature on legitimacy, given its multidisciplinary nature, its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, and the presence of complementary conceptualizations of legitimacy. We posit that the legitimacy-as-relations-in-processes perspective is valuable for advancing research in civil society organizations.

Keywords

Civil society Legitimacy Literature review Non profit sector Accountability 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abzug, R., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2001). Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise or symbols of local identities? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksartova, S. (2003). In search of legitimacy: Peace grant making of U.S. philanthropic foundations, 1988–1996. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angell, O. (2008). From market to state networking: The case of a Norwegian voluntary organization. Official Journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, 19(3), 296–315.Google Scholar
  5. Apostol, O. M. (2015). A project for Romania? The role of the civil society’s counter-accounts in facilitating democratic change in society. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(2), 210–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Appe, S. (2011). Civil society mappings by government: A comparison of Ecuadorian and Colombian cases. Journal of Civil Society, 7(2), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appe, S. (2016). NGO networks, the diffusion and adaptation of NGO managerialism, and NGO legitimacy in Latin America. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(1), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arato, A. (1981). Civil society against the state: Poland 1980–1981. Telos, 1981(47), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arato, A., & Cohen, J. (1988). Civil society and social theory. Thesis Eleven, 21(1), 40–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arenas, D., Lozano, J., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arvidson, M., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social impact measurement and non-profit organisations: compliance, resistance, and promotion. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 869–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Avritzer, L. (2008). Civil society, participatory institutions, and representation: From authorization to the legitimacy of action. Dados, 4(SE), 0.Google Scholar
  13. Barman, E. A. (2002). Asserting difference: The strategic response of nonprofit organizations to competition. Social Forces, 80(4), 1191–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barman, E. (2007). What is the bottom line for nonprofit organizations? A history of measurement in the British voluntary sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(2), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benjamin, L. M. (2008). Account space: How accountability requirements shape nonprofit practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(2), 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blessing, A. (2015). Public, private, or in-between? The legitimacy of social enterprises in the housing market. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(1), 198–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bode, I. (2006). Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolduc, V. L. (1980). Representation and legitimacy in neighborhood organizations: A case study. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 9(1–4), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Borchgrevink, K. (2017). NGOization of Islamic charity: Claiming legitimacy in changing institutional contexts. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–23.Google Scholar
  21. Botetzagias, I., & Koutiva, E. (2014). Financial giving of foundations and businesses to environmental NGOs: The role of grantee’s legitimacy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Braunstein, R., Fulton, B. R., & Wood, R. L. (2014). The role of bridging cultural practices in racially and socioeconomically diverse civic organizations. American Sociological Review, 79(4), 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government–nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 22(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brown, L. D., & Moore, M. H. (2001). Accountability, strategy, and international nongovernmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bryson, J. M., Gibbons, M. J., & Shaye, G. (2001). Enterprise schemes for nonprofit survival, growth, and effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Burdsey, D. (2015). Un/making the British Asian male athlete: Race, legibility and the state. Sociological Research Online, 20(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Carman, J. G. (2010). The accountability movement. What’s wrong with this theory of change? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Castelló, I., Morsing, M., & Schultz, F. (2013). Introduction: Communicative dynamics and the polyphony of corporate social responsibility in the network society. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cederström, C., & Fleming, P. (2016). On bandit organizations and their (IL) legitimacy: Concept development and illustration. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1575–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chambers, S., & Kopstein, J. (2001). Bad civil society. Political Theory, 29(6), 837–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chaskin, R. J. (2003). Fostering neighborhood democracy: Legitimacy and accountability within loosely coupled systems. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(2), 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Clemens, E. S. (2010). From city club to nation state: Business networks in American political development. Theory and Society, 39(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Clemens, E. S. (2015). Organizing powers in eventful times. Social Science History, 39(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Clemens, E. S., & Guthrie, D. (Eds.). (2010). Politics and partnerships: The role of voluntary associations in America’s political past and present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Colomy, P. (1998). Neofunctionalism and neoinstitutionalism: Human agency and interest in institutional change. Official Journal of the Eastern Sociological Society, 13(2), 265–300.Google Scholar
  37. Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cornwall, A., & Nyamu-Musembi, C. (2004). Putting the “rights-based approach” to development into perspective. Third World Quarterly, 25(8), 1415–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Costa, E., Ramus, T., & Andreaus, M. (2011). Accountability as a managerial tool in non-profit organizations: Evidence from Italian CSVs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3), 470–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F., & Cattaneo, C. (2013). Civil and uncivil actors for a degrowth society. Journal of Civil Society, 9(2), 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dean, M. (1994). The genealogy of the gift in antiquity. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 5(1–2), 320–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dekker, P. (2014). Tocqueville did not write about soccer clubs: Participation in voluntary associations and political involvement. In Modernizing democracy (pp. 45–57). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dépelteau, F. (Ed.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Dewey, J. (1939/2011). La formation des valeurs. Paris, La Découverte, textes de 1918 à 1944 traduits par Bidet A., Quéré L. et Truc G.Google Scholar
  46. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  47. DiMaggio, P., & Anheier, H. K. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ebrahim, A. (2002). Information struggles: The role of information in the reproduction of NGO-funder relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 84–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Edwards, M. (2000). NGO rights and responsibilities: A new deal for global governance. London: The Foreign Policy Center.Google Scholar
  53. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Eliasoph, N. (2012). The politics of volunteering. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  56. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Enjolras, B. (2009). Between market and civic governance regimes: Civicness in the governance of social services in Europe. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(3), 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Evans, M. S. (2012). Who wants a deliberative public sphere? 1. In Sociological forum (Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 872–895). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Evers, A. (2009). Civicness and civility: Their meanings for social services. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(3), 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Follett, M. P. (1925/2003). Power. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration. The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 95–116). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Forbes, D. P. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical studies of nonprofit organization effectiveness from 1977 to 1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2), 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Frantz, C., & Fuchs, D. (2014). The impact of civil society on sustainable development. In Modernizing democracy (pp. 83–96). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Fraser, N. (2007). Special section: Transnational public sphere: Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Fung, A. (2003). Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes, and realities. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 515–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. The Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Gill, R., & Wells, C. C. (2014). Welcome to the “Hunger Games” an exploration of the rhetorical construction of legitimacy for one US-based nonprofit organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gouldner, Alvin Ward. (1980). The two marxisms: Contradictions and anomalies in the development of theory. New York, NY: Seabury Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Graddy, E., & Wang, L. (2009). Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(3), 392–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  71. Gray, R., Bebbington, J., & Collison, D. (2006). NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Greiling, D., & Stötzer, S. (2015). Performance accountability as a driver for changes in nonprofit–government relationships: An empirical insight from Austria. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1690–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Guo, C., & Musso, J. A. (2007). Representation in nonprofit and voluntary organizations: A conceptual framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hall, M. (2014). Evaluation logics in the third sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hall, M., & O’Dwyer, B. (2017). Accounting, non-governmental organizations and civil society: The importance of nonprofit organizations to understanding accounting, organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Haynes, K. E., Gifford, J. L., & Pelletiere, D. (2005). Sustainable transportation institutions and regional evolution: Global and local perspectives. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(3), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Herlin, H. (2015). Better safe than sorry: Nonprofit organizational legitimacy and cross-sector partnerships. Business and Society, 54(6), 822–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Heylen, F., Fraussen, B., & Beyers, J. (2018). Live to fight another day? Organizational maintenance and mortality anxiety of civil society organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(6), 1249–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jacobs, R. N., & Sobieraj, S. (2007). Narrative and legitimacy: US congressional debates about the nonprofit sector. Sociological Theory, 25(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jepson, P. (2005). Governance and accountability of environmental NGOs. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(5), 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Johansson, H., & Lee, J. (2014). Bridging the gap: How do EU-based civil society organisations acquire their internal representation? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Johansson, N., & Metzger, J. (2016). Experimentalizing the organization of objects: Re-enacting mines and landfills. Organization, 23(6), 840–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Jung, K., & Moon, M. J. (2007). The double-edged sword of public-resource dependence: The impact of public resources on autonomy and legitimacy in Korean cultural nonprofit organizations. Policy Studies Journal, 35(2), 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil society and accountability. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kamali, M. (2001). Civil society and Islam: A sociological perspective. European Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 457–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kamali, M. (2007). Multiple modernities and Islamism in Iran. Social Compass, 54(3), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Keane, J. (1988). Democracy and civil society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  89. Kocka, J. (2004). Civil society from a historical perspective. European Review, 12(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Renewal and Critique in Social Theory, 33(3), 367–391.Google Scholar
  91. Kopecký, P., & Mudde, C. (2003). Uncivil society? Contentious politics in post-communist Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Kuosmanen, J. (2014). Care provision, empowerment, and market forces: The art of establishing legitimacy for Work Integration Social Enterprises (WISEs). VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(1), 248–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kutay, A. (2015). A critical transnational public sphere: Bringing back common good and social ontology in context. Globalizations, 13(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  94. Lehman, G. (2007). The accountability of NGOs in civil society and its public spheres. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18, 645–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Levy, D. L., & Egan, D. (2003). A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 803–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Lichterman, P., & Eliasoph, N. (2014). Civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 120(3), 798–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lilja, E. (2015). A new ecology of civil society II. Journal of Civil Society, 11(4), 402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited: 1993 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Lipset, S. M., & Lakin, J. H. (2004). The democratic century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  100. Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Sekhon, Y. K. (2014). Managing branding and legitimacy: A study of charity retail sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(4), 629–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Lorino, P. (2018). Pragmatism and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Lucea, R. (2010). How we see them versus how they see themselves: A cognitive perspective of firm—NGO relationships. Business and Society, 49(1), 116–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Luke, B., Barraket, J., & Eversole, R. (2013). Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures—performance evaluation of social enterprise. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3/4), 234–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Luyckx, J., & Janssens, M. (2016). Discursive legitimation of a contested actor over time: The multinational corporation as a historical case (1964–2012). Organization Studies, 37(11), 1595–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Maier, F., Schober, C., Simsa, R., & Millner, R. (2015). SROI as a method for evaluation research: Understanding merits and limitations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1805–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Manetti, G. (2014). The role of blended value accounting in the evaluation of socio-economic impact of social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Marberg, A., van Kranenburg, H., & Korzilius, H. (2016). NGOs in the news: The road to taken-for-grantedness. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(6), 2734–2763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Martinez, S. E., & Cooper, D. J. (2017). Assembling international development: Accountability and the disarticulation of a social movement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Meyer, M., Buber, R., & Aghamanoukjan, A. (2013). In search of legitimacy: Managerialism and legitimation in civil society organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(1), 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Meyer, M., & Simsa, R. (2014). Developments in the third sector: The last decade and a cautious view into the future. In M. Freise & T. Hallmann (Eds.), Modernizing democracy? Associations and associating in the 21st century (pp. 203–216). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Moog, S., Spicer, A., & Böhm, S. (2015). The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the forest stewardship council. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Mosley, J. E., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2015). The relationship between philanthropic foundation funding and state-level policy in the era of welfare reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1225–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Moxham, C. (2010). Help or hindrance? Examining the role of performance measurement in UK nonprofit organisations. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(3), 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Nevile, A. (2009). Values and the legitimacy of third sector service delivery organizations: Evidence from Australia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Nicholls, A. (2009). ‘We do good things, don’t we?’: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. O’Brien, T. (2010). Stuck in the middle: Maintaining the organizational legitimacy of the Regional Environmental Center. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(3), 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. O’Brien, N., & Evans, S. (2017). Civil society partnerships: Power imbalance and mutual dependence in NGO partnerships. Official Journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, 28(4), 1399–1421.Google Scholar
  123. O’Leary, S. (2017). Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: the role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. O’Sullivan, N., & O’Dwyer, B. (2009). Stakeholder perspectives on a financial sector legitimation process: The case of NGOs and the equator principles. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(4), 553–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Oser, J. L. (2010). Between atomistic and participatory democracy: Leverage, leadership, and legitimacy in Israeli civil society. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 429–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Ospina, S., Diaz, W., & O’Sullivan, J. F. (2002). Negotiating accountability: Managerial lessons from identity-based nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quaterly, 31(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Ossewaarde, R., Nijhof, A., & Heyse, L. (2008). Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organising betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 28(1), 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Pallas, C. L., Gethings, D., & Harris, M. (2015). Do the right thing: The impact of INGO legitimacy standards on stakeholder input. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1261–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Pardo, I. (1995). Morals of legitimacy in Naples: Streetwise about legality, semi-legality and crime. European Journal of Sociology, 36(1), 44–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Pérez-Díaz, V. (2002). From civil war to civil society: Social capital in Spain from the 1930s to the1990s. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  131. Pérez-Díaz, V. (2014). Civil society: A multi-layered concept. Current Sociology Review, 62(6), 812–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Pilgrim, S., & Harvey, M. (2010). Battles over biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the politics of markets. Sociological Research Online, 15(3), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Popielarz, P. A. (2018). Moral dividends: Freemasonry and finance capitalism in early-nineteenth-century America. Business History, 60(5), 655–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Popplewell, R. (2018). Civil society, legitimacy and political space: Why some organisations are more vulnerable to restrictions than others in violent and divided contexts. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(2), 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Pousadela, I. (2016). Social mobilization and political representation: The women’s movement’s struggle for legal abortion in Uruguay. Official Journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, 27(1), 125–145.Google Scholar
  136. Puljek-Shank, R. (2018). Civic agency in governance: The role of legitimacy with citizens versus donors. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 870–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Roberts, J. (1991). The possibilities of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Rosenblum, N. L., Post, R. C., & Post, R. (Eds.). (2002). Civil society and government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  139. Rubenstein, J. (2007). Accountability in an unequal world. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 616–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector II: The problem of classification. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 3(3), 267–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998a). The third route: Government–nonprofit collaboration in Germany and the United States. In E. S. Clemens (Ed.), Private action and the public good (pp. 151–176). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  142. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998b). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Salamon, L., Sokolowski, W., & List, R. (2003). Global civil society: An overview. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  144. Schlesinger, M., Mitchell, S., & Gray, B. H. (2004). Restoring public legitimacy to the nonprofit sector: A survey experiment using descriptions of nonprofit ownership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 673–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  146. Silber, I. (1998). Modern philanthropy: Reassessing the viability of a Maussian perspective. In W. James, M. Mauss, & N. J. Allen (Eds.), Marcel Mauss: A centenary tribute (Vol. 1). Oxford, New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  147. Silber, I. F. (2001). The gift-relationship in an era of ‘loose’ solidarities. In E. Ben-Rafael (Ed.), Identity, culture and globalization. The Annals of the International Sociology Institute (n.s.), Vol. 8. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, pp. 384–400.Google Scholar
  148. Silber, I. F. (2011). Emotions as regime of justification? The case of civic anger. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Silber, I. F. (2013). Neither Mauss, nor Veyne: Peter Brown’s interpretative path to the gift. In M. Satlow (Ed.), The gift in antiquity. Studies in the ancient world: Comparative histories. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 202–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Silber, I. F. (2014). Boltanski and the gift: Beyond love, beyond suspicion…? In S. Susen & B.S. Turner (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays in thePragmatic Sociology of Critique” (pp. 485–500). London, New York: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  151. Silver, I. (1997). Constructing “Social Change” through philanthropy: Boundary framing and the articulation of vocabularies of motives for social movement participation. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 488–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Silver, I. (1998). Buying an activist identity: Reproducing class through social movement philanthropy. Sociological Perspectives, 41(2), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Silver, I. (2001). Strategically legitimizing philanthropists’ identity claims: Community organizations as key players in the making of corporate social responsibility. Sociological Perspectives, 44(2), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Suárez, D. F. (2012). Grant making as advocacy: The emergence of social justice philanthropy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(3), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Suráez, D., & Gugerty, M. (2016). Funding civil society? Bilateral government support for development NGOs. Official Journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, 27(6), 2617–2640.Google Scholar
  159. Taylor, M., & Warburton, D. (2003). Legitimacy and the role of UK third sector organizations in the policy process. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(3), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Walker, E. T., & McCarthy, J. D. (2010). Legitimacy, strategy, and resources in the survival of community-based organizations. Social Problems, 57(3), 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Walton, O. E., Davies, T., Thrandardottir, E., & Keating, V. C. (2016). Understanding contemporary challenges to INGO legitimacy: Integrating top-down and bottom-up perspectives. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(6), 2764–2786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Wen, Z., & Chong, A. (2014). Legitimate deficit: Competitive bidding in a residual and semi-democratic welfare society. Official Journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, 25(5), 1214–1234.Google Scholar
  163. Zhou, H., & Ye, S. (2018). Legitimacy, worthiness, and social network: An empirical study of the key factors influencing crowdfunding outcomes for nonprofit projects. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-0004-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Zhu, J., Ye, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Legitimacy, board involvement, and resource competitiveness: Drivers of NGO revenue diversification. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(6), 1176–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Zimmermann, A., & Favell, A. (2011). Governmentality, political field or public sphere? Theoretical alternatives in the political sociology of the EU. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(4), 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Politic & PhilosophyCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Paris-Saclay - Laboratoire IDHESEcole Normale SupérieureParisFrance

Personalised recommendations