Normative Management and Diversity in International Non-government Organizations
- 107 Downloads
To accomplish their goals, International Non-government Organizations (INGOs) manage a network of internal and external stakeholders across national boundaries while having limited authority under demanding circumstances. Consequently, INGOs often rely on normative management practices aimed at influencing discretionary behavior. Unfortunately, normative management can be difficult when INGO stakeholders perceive little common ground due to large functional, cultural, socioeconomic, and power differences. These dynamics raise an important question: How can INGOs manage internal and external stakeholders in a normative fashion when these stakeholders are remarkably diverse and may perceive little or no similarity among themselves? In response to this difficulty, we argue that effective diversity management is a key contributor of effective normative management, and we develop social cognitive theory aimed at managing the salience and meaning of social distinctions. We also provide initial guidance on adapting management practices when differences are large and when individual identities are exclusive.
KeywordsInternational Non-government Organizations Diversity Discretionary behavior Social categorization
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research complies with all Voluntas ethical standards.
- Agrawala, S., Ota, T., Ahmed, A. U., Smith, J., & Aalst, M. (2003). Development and climate change in Bangladesh: Focus on costal flooding and the sundarbans. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://search.oecd.org/environment/cc/21055658.pdf.
- All Hands and Hearts. (2019). About us. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from https://www.allhandsandhearts.org/about-us/.
- Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–38). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Chemin, C., & Vercher, C. (2011). The challenge of activist coalition governance: Accommodating diversity to create institutions—An approach via the inter-relationships between action, project and instrument. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 682–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9201-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Claeyé, F. (2014). Managing nongovernmental organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Claire, T., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). A systemic view of behavioral confirmation: Counterpoint to the individualist view. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 205–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- EENET. (2019). What we do. https://www.eenet.org.uk/whatwe-do/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
- Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferdman, B. M. (2014). The practice of inclusion in diverse organizations: Toward a systemic and inclusive framework. In B. M. Ferdman & B. R. Deane (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social-perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B., Houlette, M., Johnson, K., & McGlynn, E. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics, 4, 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-26184.108.40.206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giacalone, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Grassroot Soccer. (2019). What we do. https://www.grassrootsoccer.org/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
- Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). (2019). The seven fundamental principles. http://www.ifrc.org/who-we-are/vision-and-mission/the-seven-fundamental-principles/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
- Lewis, D. (2007). The management of Non-governmental Development Organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mackie, G., Moneti, F., Shakya, H., & Denny, E. (2015). What are social norms? How are they measured? United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. https://www.unicef.org/protection/files/4_09_30_Whole_What_are_Social_Norms.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2019.
- Nezhina, T. G., & Ibrayeva, A. R. (2013). Explaining the role of culture and traditions in functioning of civil society organizations in Kazakhstan. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9256-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oakes, P. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. Turner (Ed.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 117–141). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
- One. (2019). Diversity and inclusion. https://www.one.org/us/about/diversity/. Accessed 10 January 2019.
- Oxfam International. (2019). Success stories. https://www.oxfam.org/en/tags/success-stories. Accessed 10 January 2019.
- Pillay, D. (2003). The challenge of partnerships between the state, capital, and civil society: The case of media development and diversity agency in South Africa. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14, 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000007466.15202.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramarajan, L., Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Euwema, M., & Kop, N. (2004). Relationship between peacekeepers and NGO workers: The role of training and conflict management styles in international peacekeeping. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reindorp, N., & Wiles, P. (2001). Humanitarian coordination: Lessons from recent field experience. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Retrieved September 9, 2017, from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4186.pdf.
- Richter, A. (2014). Building a culture of inclusion: The case of UNAIDS. In B. M. Ferdman & B. R. Deane (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Roberts, N. C. (2010). Spanning “bleeding” boundaries: Humanitarianism, NGOs, and the Civilian-Military Nexus in the post-Cold War era. Public Administration Review, 70, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02135_2.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Associates. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. 2). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
- UN News. (2016). UN uses virtual reality to inspire humanitarian empathy. https://news.un.org/en/story/2016/05/529752-feature-un-uses-virtual-reality-inspire-humanitarian-empathy. Accessed 10 January 2019.
- United Nations. (1996) ECOSOC Resolution E/1996/31. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from http://www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/res/1996/eres1996-31.htm.