Advertisement

“Right to the City” and the Structure of Civic Organizational Fields: Evidence from Cape Town

  • Mario Diani
  • Henrik Ernstson
  • Lorien Jasny
Original Paper

Abstract

This article proposes a network analytic approach to the role of frames in shaping the structure of civic organizational fields. Adopting a perspective from the global South, it looks at the impact of the expression “Right to the city” (RTC) over alliance building among civil society actors, exploring patterns of collaborative ties among 129 civil society organizations active in Cape Town from 2012 to 2014. The article addresses two broad questions: What is the relation between RTC and other frames that are also frequently invoked to describe urban struggles and issues? Does the RTC frame affect the structure of urban civic organizational fields in significant ways? Data suggest that while RTC plays a significant role in local civil society, it is neither the only interpretative frame that Capetonian civic organizations draw upon to characterize their activity, nor the more salient. “Urban conservation,” especially tied to nature conservation and environmental issues, actually shapes the structure of local organizational fields in a sharper manner. This is, however, a potentially more divisive frame, rooted as it is in the apartheid legacy that still shapes urban dynamics in the city.

Keywords

Civic organizational fields Urban environment Right to the city Collective action frames Inter-organizational alliances 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Data for this paper come from The CIVNET Study, an investigation of networks of citizens’ organizations in Cape Town, conducted between 2012 and 2014 under the leadership of Henrik Ernstson, in the context of the project “Socioecological Movements and Transformative Collective Action in Urban Ecosystems (MOVE),” funded by the Swedish Research Council—Formas (Contract 211-2011-1519). We are grateful to Formas for its support and to the Voluntas editors and reviewers for their comments.

References

  1. Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: the significance of partial organization. Organization, 18, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidl, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations. European Management Journal, 34, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldassarri, D., & Diani, M. (2007). The integrative power of civic networks. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 735–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, P. (2004). South Africa’s resurgent urban social movements the case of Johannesburg, 1984, 1994, 2004. Research Report No. 22. Center for Civil Society/School of Development Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal.Google Scholar
  6. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. (2011). Analyzing affiliation networks. In P. Carrington & J. Scott (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 417–433). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Breiger, R. L. (1979). Toward an operational theory of community elite structures. Quality & Quantity, 13, 21–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, W. K., & Ratner, R. S. (1996). Master framing and cross-movement networking in contemporary social movements. Sociological Quarterly, 37, 601–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cock, J. (2006). Connecting the red, brown and green: The environmental justice movement in South Africa. In R. Ballard, A. Habib, & I. Valodia (Eds.), Voices of protest. Social movements in post-apartheid South Africa (pp. 203–224). Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  10. Den Hond, F., De Bakker, F. G. A., & Smith, N. (2015). Social movements and organizational analysis. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 291–305). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Di Gregorio, M. (2012). Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: interest, values or discourse? Environmental Politics, 21, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diani, M. (1995). Green networks. A structural analysis of the italian environmental movement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Diani, M. (2003). Leaders or brokers? In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks (pp. 105–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diani, M. (2013). Organizational fields and social movement dynamics. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research: dynamics, mechanisms, and processes (pp. 145–168). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diani, M. (2015). The cement of civil society: Studying networks in localities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diani, M., & Bison, I. (2004). Organizations, coalitions, and movements. Theory and Society, 33(3–4), 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobusch, L., & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of anonymous: Fluidity, identity, and organizationality. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 1005–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Domaradzka, A. (2016). El derecho a la ciudad como consigna. In Presented at the Pensar y construir el territorio desde la cultura. Medellin: Laboratorio de Cultura Ciudadana.Google Scholar
  19. Domaradzka, A., & Wijkstrom, F. (2016). Game of the city re-negotiated: the Polish urban re-generation movements as an emerging actor in a strategic action field. Polish Sociological Review, 3, 291–308.Google Scholar
  20. Ernstson, H. (2013). Re-translating nature in post-apartheid Cape Town: The material semiotics of people and plants at bottom road. In R. Heeks (Ed.), Actor-network theory for development. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management. http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cdi/resources/cdi_ant4d/ANT4DWorkingPaper4Ernstson.pdf.
  21. Ernstson, H., & Sörlin, S. (2013). Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: On articulating values in urban nature. Ecological Economics, 86, 274–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ernstson, H., Sörlin, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2008). Social movements and ecosystem services: The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology & Society, 13, 39. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/.
  23. Gamson, W. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. Morris & C. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers of social movement theory (pp. 29–50). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Görgens, T., & van Donk, M. (2011). From basic needs towards socio-spatial transformation: Coming to grips with the ‘Right to the City’ for the urban poor in South Africa (pp. 1–23). Kenilworth, SA: Islanda Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 939–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hendricks, A. (2016). Reclaim the city demands end to sea point evictions. GroundUp. www.groundup.org.za. http://www.groundup.org.za/article/reclaim-city-demands-end-sea-point-evictions/. Accessed 7 January 2017.
  27. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. (1993). Policy change and learning : An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. Knoke, D. (1990). Organizing for change. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  29. Lefebvre, H. (1974). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  30. Lopez de Sousa, M. (2010). Which right to which city? In defence of political-strategic clarity. Interface, 2, 315–333.Google Scholar
  31. Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mathivet, C., & Buckingham, S. (2009). The Abahlali baseMjondolo Shack Dwellers Movement and the Right to the City in South Africa. http://base.d-p-h.info/es/fiches/dph/fiche-dph-8059.html. Accessed 3 January 2017.
  33. Mayer, M. (2012). The “Right to the City” in urban social movements. In N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, & M. Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people not for profit: critical urban theory and the right to the city (pp. 63–85). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. McFarlane, C., & Silver, J. (2017). The political city: “Seeing Sanitation” and making the urban political in Cape Town. Antipode, 49, 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mdlalose, B. (2014). The rise and fall of Abahlali baseMjondolo, a South African social movement. Politikon, 41, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merrifield, A. (2011). The right to the city and beyond. City, 15, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mische, A. (2003). Cross-talk in movements: Reconceiving the culture-network link. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movements and networks (pp. 258–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mische, A. (2008). Partisan publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Morange, M. (2011). Right to the City, neoliberalism and the developmental state in Cape Town. Justice Spatial | Spatial Justice, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
  42. Mottiar, S. (2013). From ‘popcorn’to ‘occupy’: Protest in Durban, South Africa. Development and Change, 44, 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mottiar, S., & Bond, P. (2012). The politics of discontent and social protest in Durban. Politikon, 39, 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pachucki, M. A., & Breiger, R. (2010). Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parnell, S., & Pieterse, E. (2010). The ‘Right to the City’: Institutional imperatives of a developmental state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33, 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pavan, E. (2012). Frames and connections in the governance of global communications: A network study of the internet governance forum. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  48. Pithouse, R. (2009). Abahlali Basemjondolo and the struggle for the city in Durban, South Africa. Cidades, 6, 241–270.Google Scholar
  49. Saunders, C. (2013). Environmental networks and social movement theory. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  50. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. Morris & C. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers of social movement theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Snow, D. A., Rochford, B. E., Worden, S., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology & Social ResearchUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  4. 4.University of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations