Advertisement

Between Rhetoric and Action: Do NGOs Go Where They Are Needed?

  • Dipendra K. C. 
Original Paper

Abstract

This research analyzes the factors that determine the placement of development NGOs in Nepal through the examination of the placement data of 39,606 NGOs. Using multivariate ordinary least squares, this investigation demonstrates that the location of an NGO is determined by: level of community needs, resource availability, and the level of political engagement. NGOs are in fact active where their support services are in high demand. However, the other two determinants: ‘resource dependency’ and ‘political engagement’ suggest that development outcomes may be limited due to placement concentration in areas of high human resource availability and high political activity.

Keywords

Nonprofit location Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) Nepal Geographic placement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank my colleagues Austina Karma Gurung, Chris Oestereich, Istvan Rado, Stéphane P. Rousseau, Pearl Phaovisaid, Daniel McFarlane, and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback in the earlier version of this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bae, K. B., & Sohn, H. (2017). Factors contributing to the size of nonprofit sector: tests of government failure, interdependence, and social capital theory. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9888-3.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development, 66(Supplement C), 707–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, J. A. C., & Haveman, H. A. (1997). Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 304–338.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bebbington, A., Hickey, S., & Mitlin, D. C. (2008). Can NGOs make a difference? The challenge of development alternatives. (A. Bebbington, S. Hickey, & D. C. Mitlin, Eds.) (Illustrate). London & New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bhandari, A., & Onta, P. (2017, February 24). Revisiting the NGO numbers debate. The Kathmandu Post, p. 6. Retrieved from http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2017-02-24/revisiting-the-ngo-numbers-debate.html.
  6. Bhatta, C. D. (2012). Unveiling Nepal’s civil society. Journal of Civil Society, 8(2), 185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2012.732429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatta, C. D. (2013). External influence and challenges of state-building in Nepal. Asian Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 169–188.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2013.823800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bielefeld, W., & Murdoch, J. C. (2004). The locations of nonprofit organizations and their for-profit counterparts: An exploratory analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 221–246.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003260589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brass, J. N. (2012). Why do NGOs go where they go? Evidence from Kenya. World Development, 40(2), 387–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bratton, M. (1989). The politics of government-NGO relations in Africa. World Development, 17(4), 569–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90263-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brett, E. A. (1993). Voluntary agencies as development organizations: Theorizing the problem of efficiency and accountability. Development and Change, 24(2), 269–304.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00486.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, T. F. (1992). Intermediary NGOs: The supporting link in grassroots development. Sterling: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  13. Central Bureau of Statistics. (2001). National population census 2001, national report. Retrieved from Kathmandu, Nepal http://cbs.gov.np/nada/index.php/catalog/42/download/543. Accessed 14 Apr 2017.
  14. Clifford, D. (2012). Voluntary sector organisations working at the neighbourhood level in England: Patterns by local area deprivation. Environment and Planning A, 44(5), 1148–1164.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a44446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Da Costa, M. M. (2016). What influences the location of nonprofit organizations? A spatial analysis in Brazil. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1064–1090.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9682-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Department of Roads. (2002). Highway management information system (HMIS) news. Retrieved from KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhakal, T. N. (2002). The role of non-governmental organisations in the improvement of livelihood in Nepal. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Tampere, Finland. Retrieved from https://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/67199/951-44-5347-6.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 3 May 2017.
  18. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Financial Controller General Office. (2001). Consolidated financial statements of his majesty’s governmentNepal fiscal year 2000/2001. Retrieved from Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  20. Fruttero, A., & Gauri, V. (2005). The strategic choices of NGOs: Location decisions in Rural Bangladesh. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(5), 759–787.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500145289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galway, L. P., Corbett, K. K., & Zeng, L. (2012). Where are the NGOs and why? The distribution of health and development NGOs in Bolivia. Globalization and Health, 8(1), 38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-8-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gemmill, B., & Bamidele-Izu, A. (2002). The role of NGOs and civil society in global environmental governance. In D. C. Esty & M. H. Ivanova (Eds.), Global environmental governance: Options and opportunities (pp. 77–100). New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  23. Grønbjerg, K. A., & Paarlberg, L. (2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 684–706.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001304004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo, C., & Acar, M. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 340–361.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764005275411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ICNL. (2017). Civic freedom monitor: Nepal. Retrieved from http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/nepal.html#analysis. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
  26. Karkee, R., & Comfort, J. (2016). NGOs, foreign aid, and development in Nepal. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 177.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00177.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, M. (2015). Socioeconomic diversity, political engagement, and the density of nonprofit organizations in U.S. countries. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 402–416.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013504616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, D. (2014). Non-governmental organizations, management and development (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Ministry of Finance. (2017). Development cooperation reportFiscal year 2015/16. Retrieved from Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray, V. V. (1998). Interorganizational collaborations in the nonprofit sector. In J. M. Shafirtz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public administration (Vol. 2, pp. 1192–1196). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Planning Commission. (2015). Sustainable development goals, 20162030, national (preliminary) report. Retrieved from Kathmandu, Nepal http://www.undp.org/content/dam/nepal/docs/reports/SDGfinalreport-nepal.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
  32. Obiyan, A. S. (2005). A critical examination of the state versus non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the policy sphere in the global South: Will the state die as the NGOs thrive in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia? African and Asian studies, 4(3), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paarlberg, L. E., & Yoshioka, T. (2016). The impact of local economic structure on community philanthropy. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 340–350.  https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peck, L. R. (2008). Do antipoverty nonprofits locate where people need them? Evidence from a spatial analysis of Phoenix. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 138–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006298963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  36. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of voluntary action research, 16(1–2), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shrestha, C. H., & Adhikari, R. (2011). NGOization and de-NGOization of public action in Nepal: The role of organizational culture in civil society politicality. Journal of Civil Society, 7(1), 41–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.553420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Social Welfare Council. (2014). List of NGOs affiliated with SWC. Kathmandu: Social Welfare Council.Google Scholar
  40. Social Welfare Council. (2016). Brief information on INGOs working under agreement with SWC. Retrieved from Kathmandu: http://www.swc.org.np/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/INGOs-detail-information-2072_073-Falgun-Masant.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  41. The Social Welfare Act, Social Welfare Council (Government of Nepal, 1992 November 2).Google Scholar
  42. Torpey-Saboe, N. (2015). Does NGO presence decrease government spending? A look at municipal spending on social services in Brazil. World Development, 74, 479–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Puyvelde, S., & Brown, W. A. (2016). Determinants of nonprofit sector density: A stakeholder approach. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1045–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9656-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. United Nations Development Programme. (2004). Nepal human development report 2004. Retrieved from Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  45. Yan, J., Guo, C., & Paarlberg, L. E. (2014). Are nonprofit anti poverty organizations located where they are needed? A spatial analysis of the greater Hartford Region. The American Statistician, 68(4), 243–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2014.955211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Global StudiesThammasat UniversityPathum ThaniThailand
  2. 2.National Institute of Development AdministrationBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations