Unveiling Research Trends for Organizational Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector
Public scrutiny and the need for funds in a more competitive environment are pressuring nonprofits to be more consciously aware of their reputation. This study used automated analysis with text mining and topic modeling of 177 articles directly linked to nonprofits’ reputation and published up to 2016. After identifying the most salient topics and conducting an in-depth, critical review of the most significant articles within each topic, four theoretical and managerial implications were identified. First, managers need to develop skills to deal with risk, the Internet, and social networks. Second, risk management is an emergent, still tentative, but important topic waiting for more contributions. Third, researchers can apply lexicons developed and validated by experts to uncover knowledge relevant to the entire nonprofit sector’s organizations. Last, the trends and topics highlighted can help scholars and practitioners make better decisions in research or responses to management challenges.
KeywordsNonprofit organizations Reputation Text mining Topic modeling
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, grants UID/MULTI/4466/2016 and UID/GES/00315/2013. The authors also would like to thank the valuable suggestions made by the Editor and the Anonymous Reviewers during the peer-review process.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Cortez, P. (2014). Modern optimization with R. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Defourny, J., Gronbjerg, K., Meijs, L., Nyssens, M., & Yamauchi, N. (2016). Voluntas symposium: Comments on Salamon and Sokolowski’s re-conceptualization of the third sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1546–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9743-y.Google Scholar
- Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
- Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.Google Scholar
- Herman, M. L., Head, G. L., Jackson, P. M., Fogarty, T. E., & Kronstadt, J. (2004). Managing risk in nonprofit organizations: A comprehensive guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Huang, S., & Ku, H. (2016). Brand image management for nonprofit organizations: Exploring the relationships between websites, brand images and donations. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 80–96.Google Scholar
- Ling, Q., & Neely, D. G. (2013). Charitable ratings and financial reporting quality: Evidence from the human service sector. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 25(1), 69–90.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J., & Slancik, G. R. (1978). Social control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Smith, D. H., Stebbins, R. A., & Dover, M. A. (2006). Nonprofit terms & concepts. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Torres-Moraga, E., Vásquez-Parraga, A. Z., & Barra, C. (2010). Antecedents of donor trust in an emerging charity sector: The role of reputation, familiarity, opportunism and communication. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 6(29), 159–177.Google Scholar
- Willems, J. (2016). Organizational crisis resistance: Examining leadership mental models of necessary practices to resist crises and the role of organizational context. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(6), 2807–2832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9753-9.Google Scholar