Skip to main content
Log in

Great Expectations: Voluntary Sports Clubs and Their Role in Delivering National Policy for English Sport

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Voluntary sports clubs (VSCs) account for about a quarter of all volunteering in England. The volunteers work in a mutual aid, self-production, self-consumption system whose main purpose is identifying and nurturing high-level performers. But the new HMG/Sport England strategies leading to London 2012 expects volunteers to make a major contribution to sustaining and extending participation. The study utilized six focus group sessions with a total of 36 officials and members of 36 clubs across the six counties of Eastern England to assess whether and to what extent government policy objectives can be delivered through the voluntary sector. The study focused on the perceptions and attitudes of club members about being expected to serve public policy and the current pressures they and their clubs face. The results lead the authors to question the appropriateness, sensitivity, and feasibility of current sport policy, particularly the emphasis on VSCs as policy implementers.

Résumé

Les clubs de sport bénévoles constituent près d’un quart du volontariat considéré dans son ensemble en Angleterre. Les bénévoles travaillent dans le cadre d’une entraide mutuelle, une indépendance et un système de consommation personnelle dont le principal objectif est d’identifier et de veiller au développement de sportifs de haut niveau. Cependant la nouvelle stratégie de HMG/Sport England menant à Londres 2012 s’attend à ce que les bénévoles apportent une contribution majeure pour soutenir et étendre la participation. L’étude a eu recours à six sessions de groupes comptant 36 officiels et membres de 36 clubs parmi les six comtés de l’est de l’Angleterre en vue d’évaluer comment et dans quelle mesure les objectifs de politique gouvernementale peuvent être atteints par le biais du secteur bénévole. L’étude s’est concentrée sur les perceptions et les attitudes des membres de club en vue de répondre à la politique publique et les pressions actuelles auxquels ils font face ainsi que leurs clubs. Les résultats amènent les auteurs à se questionner sur l’aspect approprié, sensible et faisable de la politique de sport actuelle, tout particulièrement sur l’accent mis par les concepteurs de politique des clubs de sport bénévoles.

Zusammenfassung

Ein Viertel aller Freiwilligenarbeit in England wird in Sportvereinen ausgeübt. Die Freiwilligen arbeiten in einem System von gegenseitiger Hilfe, Eigenproduktion, Eigenverbrauch, dessen Hauptzweck die Identifizierung und Förderung von Spitzenperformern ist. Aber die neuen HMG/Sport England Strategien in Vorbereitung für London 2012 erwarten von Freiwilligen einen großen Beitrag zur Stärkung und Erweiterung der Mitgliedschaft. Die Studie verwendete sechs Veranstaltungen von Fokusgruppen mit insgesamt 36 Funktionären und Mitliedern von 36 Klubs aus sechs Grafschaften aus dem Osten Englands, um zu untersuchen, ob und inwieweit staatspolitische Ziele über den freiwilligen Sektor geliefert werden können. Die Studie konzentriert sich darauf, was Klubmitglieder sich vorstellen und davon halten, im Dienste der Staatspolitik zu agieren, und unter welchem Druck sie und ihre Klubs gegenwärtig stehen. Die Resultate lassen die Autoren an Angebrachtheit, Sensibilität und Machbarkeit der gegenwärtigen Sportpolitik, insbesondere die Betonung auf Sportvereine als diejenigen, die Politik umsetzen, zweifeln.

Resumen

Los clubes deportivos de voluntarios (CDV) representan aproximadamente una cuarta parte de todo el voluntariado en Inglaterra. Los voluntarios trabajan dentro de un sistema de ayuda mutua, auto-producción y autoconsumo cuyo propósito principal es identificar y fomentar deportistas de alto nivel. Sin embargo, la estrategia del nuevo HMG/Sport England con vistas a Londres 2012 es confiar en que los voluntarios hagan una aportación importante fomentando y ampliando la participación. El estudio se basó en seis sesiones de grupos focales con un total de 36 oficiales y miembros de 36 clubes de seis condados del este de Inglaterra para evaluar si pueden lograrse los objetivos de la política del gobierno a través el sector de voluntariado y, en caso positivo, hasta qué punto. El estudio se centró en las percepciones y actitudes de los miembros del club, en concreto: si esperan contribuir a la política pública y cuáles son las presiones que afrontan actualmente, tanto ellos como sus clubes. Los resultados llevaron a los autores a cuestionar la idoneidad, la sensibilidad y la viabilidad de la actual política deportiva, sobre todo el hincapié que se hace en los CDV como ejecutores de la política.

摘要

志愿体育俱乐部(VSC)约占英国所有志愿服务的四分之一。志愿者的工作模式是一个相互帮助、自产自消的体系,其主要目的是发现和培养高素质的支援工作者。但英国政府/英格兰体育委员会针对 2012 年伦敦奥运会的新战略,是希望志愿者能够在维持和扩大体育参与程度方面做出重大贡献。英格兰东部六郡 36 家俱乐部的 36 名官员和成员进行的 6 次重要小组会议,专门研究了政府的政策目标是否能够、或者能够在多大程度上通过志愿者的工作来实现。本研究重点关注的问题,是俱乐部成员对政府期望他们提供的公共政策服务的看法和态度,以及他们及其俱乐部目前面临的压力。研究结果使作者对现行体育政策的适当性、敏感性和可行性产生怀疑,特别是强调将志愿体育俱乐部作为政策执行者的体育政策。

ملخص

النوادي الرياضية المدعمة بالأعمال التطوعية (VSCs) تمثل ربع الأعمال التطوعية في إنجلترا. نظام عمل المتطوعين في المساعدات المتبادلة ، الإنتاج الذاتي ، نظام الإستهلاك الذاتي هدفه الرئيسي هو تحديد ورعاية المؤديين ذو المستوى العالي. لكن إستراتيجيات HMG / رياضة إنجلترا التي تؤدي إلى لندن عام 2012 تتوقع تقديم المتطوعين مساهمة كبيرة لإدامة وتوسيع نطاق المشاركة. إستخدمت الدراسة مركز نشاط ست جلسات جماعية من مجموعه 36 من المسؤولين وأعضاء من 36 نادياً في مختلف أنحاء المقاطعات الست في شرق انجلترا لتقييم ما إذا كان وإلى أي مدى يمكن توفير أهداف سياسة الحكومة من خلال القطاع التطوعي. ركزت الدراسة على التصورات والمواقف من أعضاء النادي لأنهم من المتوقع أن يخدموا السياسة العامة ، والضغوط الحالية التي يواجهوها هم وأنديتهم. النتائج تؤدي الكتاب إلى المساءلة عن مدى الملاءمة ، والحساسية ، وجدوى سياسة الرياضة الحالية ، ولا سيما التركيز على VSCs كمنفذي السياسة.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Education, religion, health, children, local community, hobbies, overseas aid, animal welfare, elderly people, conservation, social welfare, politics, safety, justice, and trade unions.

References

  • Allison, M. (2001). Sports clubs in Scotland. Research report 75. Edinburgh: Sport Scotland.

  • Anders, G. (1991). Structures and functions of sports clubs in Germany: Between service organisation and social community. Paper presented to RECMAN ’91 conference, Birmingham.

  • Bergsgaard, B., Houlihan, B., Mangset, P., Nodland, S. I., & Rommetvedt, H. (2007). Sport policy: A comparative analysis of stability and change. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D. (1993). Organising public and voluntary agencies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J., & Hoggett, P. (1986). Organising around enthusiasms. London: Comedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, C., & Wicker, P. (2008). Sports clubs in Germany. Cologne: German Sports University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treaise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen Lane.

  • Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.

  • Cabinet Office. (2007). Helping out: A national survey of volunteering and charitable giving. London: Office of the Third Sector.

  • Central Council for Physical Recreation. (2002). Boom or bust? Voluntary club survey. London: CCPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: Who’s keeping the score? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. F. (2008a). Back to sport’s comfort zone—or up a cul-de-sac? (Sport England’s strategy 2008–11). Sports Management, 12(3), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. F. (2008b). Public policies on sports development: Can mass and elite sport hold together? In V. Girginov (Ed.), Management of sports development (pp. 59–87). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. F., & Nichols, G. (2005). Summary: An emerging research agenda. In G. Nichols & M. Collins (Eds.), Volunteers in sports clubs (pp. 119–125). Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuskelly, G., Hoyt, R., & Auld, C. (2006). Working with volunteers in sport: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Knop, P., Van Meerbeek, R., Vanreusel, B., Laporte, W., Theebom, M., Wittock, H., et al. (1999). Sports clubs in crisis? European Journal of Sport Management, Special Issue, 104–112.

  • Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide for small-scale research projects. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Culture Media and Sport. (2008). Playing to win: A new era for sport. London: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enjolras, B. (2002). The commercialisation of voluntary sport organisations in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. (2003). The response of voluntary sport clubs to Sport England’s Lottery funding: Cases of compliance, change and resistance. In G. Nichols (Ed.), Volunteers in sport (pp. 55–79). Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage Publications.

  • Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. London: Sage Publications.

  • Handy, C. (1988). Understanding voluntary organisations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Rochester, C. (2001). Voluntary organisations and social policy in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, K., & Schubert, M. (1994). Sports clubs: A representative survey (Vol. 80). Federal Sports Institute. Schorndorf: Verlag Karl Hofmann.

  • Horch, H. (1994). Does government financing have a detrimental effect on the autonomy of voluntary associations? Evidence from German sports clubs. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 29(3), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., & Bramham, P. (2008). Resources for developing Sports Development Practice. In P. Bramham & K. Hylton (Eds.), Sports development: Policy, process and practice (2nd ed., pp. 186–213). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: Whys and wherefores. Policy and Politics, 28(4), 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikulis, L., Slack, T., Hinings, C. R., & Zimmermann, A. (1989). A structural taxonomy of amateur sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 3(2), 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G., & James, M. (2008). One size does not fit all: Implications of sports club diversity for their effectiveness as a policy tool and for government support. Managing Leisure: An International Journal, 13, 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G., Shibli, S., & Taylor, P. (1998). Pressures that contribute to a change in the nature of the voluntary sector in UK sport. Vrijetidstudies, 16(2), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G., Taylor, P., James, M., Holmes, K., King, L., & Garrett, R. (2005). Pressures on the UK voluntary sport sector. Voluntas, 16(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. (1993). The organisational behaviour of unpaid workers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid Howie Associates. (2006). The sustainability of local sports clubs in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, C. (1999). One size does not fit all: Four models of involving volunteers in small voluntary organisations. Voluntary Action, 1(2), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seippel, O. (2004). The world according to voluntary sport organisations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 39(2), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, G. (2007). How to get beneath the surface in focus groups. www.mnav.com/bensirf.htm

  • Sport England. (2004). The framework for sport in England. London: Sport England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sport England. (2005). Driving up participation: The challenge for sport. London: Sport England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sport England. (2008). Strategy 2008–11. London: Sport England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sports Council. (1996). Valuing volunteers in UK sport. London: Sports Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. (1996). Volunteering: A serious leisure perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B., Nicholson, M., Smith, A., & Westerbeek, H. (2004). Australian sport: Better by design—The evolution of Australian sport policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (2004). Driving up participation: Sport and volunteering. London: Sport England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., James, M., Holmes, K., King, L., & Garrett, R. (2007). Facilitating organisational effectiveness among volunteers in sport. Voluntary Action, 8(3), 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Nichols, G., Holmes, K., James, M., Gratton, C., Garrett, R., et al. (2003). Sports volunteering in England 2002. London: Sport England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, A., & Mayer, J. (2009). Characteristics of voluntary sports clubs management: A sociological perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spencer Harris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, S., Mori, K. & Collins, M. Great Expectations: Voluntary Sports Clubs and Their Role in Delivering National Policy for English Sport. Voluntas 20, 405–423 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9095-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9095-y

Keywords

Navigation