Advertisement

“We Actually Trust the Community:” Examining the Dynamics of a Nonprofit Funding Relationship in New Zealand

  • Sally Shaw
  • Justine B. Allen
Original Paper

Abstract

Funding relationships in nonprofit management are increasingly defined by a philosophy of rational management, characterized by measurement of outputs and benchmarking, which represents an audit culture system (Burnley, Matthews, & McKenzie, 2005). There is concern that these approaches are constantly undermining the mission of community service nonprofit organizations (Darcy, 2002). In this research, we analyzed the management of funding relationships by examining dynamics within a nonprofit funding relationship in New Zealand. Through focus groups we explored the relationship between 17 representatives from nonprofit organizations and four Board members of a funding Trust. The management of this funding relationship was characterized by an appreciation of the diverse nature of nonprofit organizations, a balance between trust and control, and communication. We suggest that elements of these dynamics could be incorporated into nonprofit funding relationships in order to challenge an over-reliance on audit culture systems, and to re-establish relationships characterized by interaction between nonprofit organizations and their funders. Finally, we call for future research in this area.

Keywords

Nonprofit Trust Control Communication Organizational knowledge Service delivery New Zealand 

References

  1. Adcroft, A., & Willis, R. (2005). The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18, 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2003). Alternative management and accounting research – whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 28, 97–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bransden, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnley, C., Matthews, C., & McKenzie, S. (2005). Devolution of services to children and families: The experience of NPOs in Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada. Voluntas, 16, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, D. (1995). Power in struggle. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darcy, M. (2002). Community management. How management discourse killed participation. Critical Quarterly, 44, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferlie, E., & Steane, P. (2002). Changing developments in NPM. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1459–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  12. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (1996). Working together. Key themes in the management of relationships between public and non-profit organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(7), 5–17.Google Scholar
  13. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1159–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McQueen, M. (2004). Us and them. Decoding the language of nonprofit-business partnerships. Nonprofit World, 22, 21–22.Google Scholar
  15. Mook, L., Richmond, B. J., & Quarter, J. (2003). Integrated social accounting for nonprofits: A case from Canada. Voluntas, 14(3), 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parsons, E., & Broadbridge, A. (2004). Managing change in nonprofit organizations: Insights from the UK charity retail sector. Voluntas, 15, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Quarter, J., & Richmond, B. J. (2001). Accounting for social value in nonprofits and for-profits. Nonprofit management and leadership, 12, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Richmond, B. J., Mook, L., & Quarter, J. (2003). Social accounting for nonprofits. Nonprofit management and leadership 13, 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organisations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483–498.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, L.-A., & Boyle, E. (2004). The role of partnerships in the delivery of local government museum services. A case study from Northern Ireland. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(6), 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physical EducationUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations