Advertisement

Journal of Signal Processing Systems

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 179–189 | Cite as

A Generic Intelligent Bearing Fault Diagnosis System Using Compact Adaptive 1D CNN Classifier

  • Levent ErenEmail author
  • Turker Ince
  • Serkan Kiranyaz
Article
  • 421 Downloads

Abstract

Timely and accurate bearing fault detection and diagnosis is important for reliable and safe operation of industrial systems. In this study, performance of a generic real-time induction bearing fault diagnosis system employing compact adaptive 1D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) classifier is extensively studied. In the literature, although many studies have developed highly accurate algorithms for detecting bearing faults, their results have generally been limited to relatively small train/test data sets. As opposed to conventional intelligent fault diagnosis systems that usually encapsulate feature extraction, feature selection and classification as distinct blocks, the proposed system takes directly raw time-series sensor data as input and it can efficiently learn optimal features with the proper training. The main advantages of the 1D CNN based approach are 1) its compact architecture configuration (rather than the complex deep architectures) which performs only 1D convolutions making it suitable for real-time fault detection and monitoring, 2) its cost effective and practical real-time hardware implementation, 3) its ability to work without any pre-determined transformation (such as FFT or DWT), hand-crafted feature extraction and feature selection, and 4) its capability to provide efficient training of the classifier with limited size of training data set and limited number of BP iterations. Effectiveness and feasibility of the 1D CNN based fault diagnosis method is validated by applying it to two commonly used benchmark real vibration data sets and comparing the results with the other competing intelligent fault diagnosis methods.

Keywords

Bearing fault detection Intelligent systems Convolutional neural networks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank University of Cincinnati and Case Western Reserve University for making the bearing datasets publicly available and giving the permission to use it.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gao, Z., Cecati, C., & Ding, S. X. (2015). A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques—Part I: Fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches. IEEE Transactions Industrial Electronics, 62, 3757–3767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Filippetti, F., Bellini, A., & Capolino, G. A. (2013). Condition monitoring and diagnosis of rotor faults in induction machines: State of art and future perspectives. In Proceedings of the IEEE WEMDCD, Paris, pp 196–209.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou, W., Habetler, T., & Harley, R. (2008). Bearing fault detection via stator current noise cancellation and statistical control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55, 4260–4269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kral, C., Habetler, T. G., & Harley, R. G. (2004). Detection of mechanical imbalances of induction machines without spectral analysis of time domain signals. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 40, 1101–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schoen, R. R., Habetler, T. G., Kamran, F., & Bartheld, R. G. (1995). Motor bearing damage detection using stator current monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 31, 1274–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kliman, G. B., Premerlani, W. J., Yazici, B., Koegl, R. A., & Mazereeuw, J. (1997). Sensorless online motor diagnostics. IEEE Computer Applications in Power, 10, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pons-Llinares, J., Antonino-Daviu, J. A., Riera-Guasp, M., Lee, S. B., Kang, T. J., & Yang, C. (2015). Advanced inductionmotor rotorfault diagnosis via continuous and discrete time–frequency tools. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62, 1791–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, D. Z., Wang, W., & Ismail, F. (2015). An enhanced bispectrum technique with auxiliary frequency injection for induction motor health condition monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 67, 2279–2287.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eren, L., & Devaney, M. J. (2004). Bearing damage detection via wavelet packet decomposition of the stator current. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 53, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yan, R., Gao, R. X., & Chen, X. (2014). Wavelets for fault diagnosis of rotary machines: A review with applications. Signal Processing, 96, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, B., Chow, M.-Y., Tipsuwan, Y., & Hung, J. C. (2000). Neural network based motor rolling bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 47, 1060–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bin, G. F., Gao, J. J., Li, X. J., & Dhillon, B. S. (2012). Early fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on wavelet packets – Empirical mode decomposition feature extraction and neural network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 27, 696–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tung, V. T., Yang, B.-S., Oh, M.-S., & Tan, A. C. C. (2009). Fault diagnosis of induction motor based on decision trees and adaptive neurofuzzy inference. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 1840–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, S.-D., Wu, P.-H., Wu, C.-W., Ding, J.-J., & Wang, C.-C. (2012). Bearing fault diagnosis based on multiscale permutation entropy and support vector machine. Entropy, 14, 1343–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kang, M., Kim, J., Kim, J.-M., Tan, A. C. C., Kim, E. Y., & Choi, B.-K. (2014). Reliable fault diagnosis for lowspeed bearings using individually trained support vector machines with kernel discriminative feature analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 30, 2786–2797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kowalski, C. T., & Kowalska, T. O. (2003). Neural network application for induction motor faults diagnosis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 63, 435–448.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ballal, M. S., Khan, Z. J., Suryawanshi, H. M., & Sonolikar, R. L. (2007). Adaptive neural fuzzy inference system for the detection of inter-turn insulation and bearing wear faults in induction motor. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, K., & Parlos, A. G. (2002). Induction motor fault diagnosis based on neuropredictors and wavelet signal processing. IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 7, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van, M., & Kang, H.-J. (2016). Bearing defect classification based on individual wavelet local fisher discriminant analysis with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 12, 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, R., Yang, B., Zhang, X., Wang, S., & Chen, X. (2016). Time-frequency atoms-driven support vector machine method for bearings incipient fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 75, 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dai, X., & Gao, Z. (2013). From model, signal to knowledge: A data-driven perspective of fault detection and diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9, 2226–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qiao, H., Zhengjia, H., Zhousuo, Z., & Yanyang, Z. (2007). Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on improved wavelet package transform and SVMs ensemble. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21, 688–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yaqub, M. F., Gondal, I., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2012). Inchoate fault detection framework: Adaptive selection of wavelet nodes and cumulant orders. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 61, 685–695.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Konar, P., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2011). Bearing fault detection of induction motor using wavelet and support vector machines (SVMs). Applied Soft Computing, 11, 4203–4211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, X., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Z., & Wang, J. (2015). Bearing fault diagnosis based on statistical locally, linear embedding. Sensors, 15, 16225–16247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shuai, J., Shen, C., & Zhu, Z. (2017). Adaptive morphological feature extraction and support vector regressive classification for bearing fault diagnosis. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2017, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vakharia, V., Gupta, V. K., & Kankar, P. K. (2014). A multiscale permutation entropy based approach to select wavelet for fault diagnosis of ball bearings. Journal of Vibration and Control, 21, 3123–3131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bellini, A., Filippetti, F., Franceshini, G., & Tassoni, C. (2001). Quantitative evaluation motor broken bars by means of electrical signature analysis. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 37, 1248–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ayhan, B., Chow, M., & Song, M. (2005). Multiple signature processing-based fault detection schemes for broken rotor bar in induction motors. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 20, 336–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ye, Z., Wu, B., & Sadeghian, A. (2003). Current signature analysis of induction motor mechanical faults by wavelet packet decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 50, 1217–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wiesel, D. H., & Hubel, T. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 148, 574–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kiranyaz, S., Ince, T., & Gabbouj, M. (2015). Real-time patient-specific ECG classification by 1D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63, 664–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ince, T., Kiranyaz, S., Eren, L., Askar, M., & Gabbouj, M. (2016). Real-time motor fault detection by 1D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63, 7067–7075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eren, L. (2017). Bearing Fault Detection by One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, R., Peng, Z., Wu, L., Yao, B., & Guan, Y. (2017). Fault diagnosis from raw sensor data using deep neural networks considering temporal coherence. Sensors, 17, 549–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ciresan, D. C., Meier, U., Gambardella, L. M., & Schmidhuber, J. (2010). Deep big simple neural nets for handwritten digit recognition. Neural Computation, 22, 3207–3220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Scherer, D., Muller, A. & Behnke, S. (2010). Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for object recognition. In Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN), Thessaloniki, pp 92–101.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Lake Tahoe, pp 1097–1105.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wowk, V. (1991). Machinery vibration, measurement and analysis. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee, J., Qiu, H., Yu, G., & Lin, J. (2017). Rexnord technical services, IMS, University of Cincinnati. Bearing data set, NASA Ames prognostics data repository. NASA Ames Research Center: Moffett field. Available online: https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/#bearing. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  41. 41.
    Case Western Reserve University Bearing Data Center Website. http://csegroups.case.edu/bearingdatacenter/home. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  42. 42.
    Qiu, H., Lee, J., Yu, G., & Lin, J. (2006). Wavelet filter-based weak signature detection method and its application on roller bearing prognostics. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 289, 1066–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Randall, R. B. (2015). Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 64-65, 100–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Farabet, C., Poulet, C., Han, J., & LeCun, Y. (2009). CNP: An FPGA-based processor for convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications, Prague, pp 32–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical & Electronics EngineeringIzmir University of EconomicsIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Electrical Engineering, Qatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations