Memory Requirement Reduction Method for Successive Cancellation Decoding of Polar Codes
- 212 Downloads
Abstract
The invention of Polar codes by Arıkan is a major breakthrough in coding theory. Polar Code decoding algorithm implementation is a major challenge to recover transmitted information. Thus, several polar decoder architectures were proposed in the literature. All of these architectures focused on reducing the computational hardware complexity and increasing the throughput of polar decoders. However, the memory requirements remain a limiting implementation factor that has not been fully adressed yet. This paper proposes a novel method to simply redesign existing decoder architectures in order to use less memory at the cost of some extra computational logic. The main idea is to replace memory sections — assigned to store intermediate results — with computational logic. The method, applied to an existing decoder \(\mathcal {D}\), results in what is called a mixed decoder architecture based on \(\mathcal {D}\), denoted \(M({\mathcal {D}})\). Since previous decoders are based on the semi-parallel decoder architecture, we first apply the memory requirement reduction technique to a semi-parallel decoder. Analyses, together with logic synthesis results, show that the gains brought by the reduction in memory area requirements are well worth the induced extra computational logic area. We show that the memory requirement reduction technique can increase the speed/area ratio by 25 % when implemented in standard cell technology (ST 65 nm). We also provide some insights on the potential gain that this method would provide on state-of-the-art decoders implemented on FPGA devices. For example, it is shown that the proposed method can lower the decoder memory requirements by 50 % while using less than 20 % of the FPGA logic elements, and implying a latency penalty of less than 5 %.
Keywords
Polar codes Forward error correction Hardware architecture Successive cancellation decodingReferences
- 1.5g: A technology vision. http://www.huawei.com/5gwhitepaper/, Accessed: 2010-09-30.
- 2.Alamdar-Yazdi, A., & Kschischang, F.R. (2011). A simplified successive-cancellation decoder for polar codes. IEEE Communications Letters, 15(12), 1378–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Arikan, E. (2008). Channel polarization: A method for constructing capacity-achieving codes. In IEEE ISIT 2008 (pp. 1173–1177).Google Scholar
- 4.Arikan, E. (2009). Channel polarization: A method for constructing capacity-achieving codes for symmetric binary-input memoryless channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55(7), 3051–3073.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Berhault, G., Leroux, C., Jego, C., & Dallet, D. Partial sums generation architecture for successive cancellation decoding of polar codes. In IEEE workshop on signal processing systems (SiPS), 2013 (pp. 407–412): IEEE.Google Scholar
- 6.Berhault, G., Leroux, C., Jego, C., & Dallet, D. (2015). Partial sums computation in polar codes decoding. In IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS), 2015 (pp. 826–829).Google Scholar
- 7.Chen, K., Niu, K., & Lin, J.R. (2012). List successive cancellation decoding of polar codes. Electronics Letters, 48(9), 500–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fan, Y., & Tsui, C.Y. (2014). An efficient partial-sum network architecture for semi-parallel polar codes decoder implementation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(12), 3165–3179.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Giard, P., Sarkis, G., Thibeault, C., & Gross, W.J. (2015). 237 gbit/s unrolled hardware polar decoder. Electronics Letters, 51(10), 762–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Leroux, C., Raymond, A.J., Sarkis, G., & Gross, W.J. (2013). A semi-parallel successive-cancellation decoder for polar codes. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 61(2), 289–299.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Leroux, C., Raymond, A.J., Sarkis, G., Tal, I., Vardy, A., & Gross, W.J. (2012). Hardware implementation of successive-cancellation decoders for polar codes. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 69(3), 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Leroux, C., Tal, I., Vardy, A., & Gross, W.J. (2011). Hardware architectures for successive cancellation decoding of polar codes, (pp. 1665–1668).Google Scholar
- 13.Li, B., Shen, H., & Tse, D. (2012). An adaptive successive cancellation list decoder for polar codes with cyclic redundancy check. IEEE Communications Letters, 16(12), 2044–2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Pamuk, A., & Arikan, E. A two phase successive cancellation decoder architecture for polar codes. In 2013 IEEE international symposium on information theory proceedings (ISIT) (pp. 957–961).Google Scholar
- 15.Raymond, A.J., & Gross, W.J. (2014). A scalable successive-cancellation decoder for polar codes. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(20), 5339–5347.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sarkis, G., Giard, P., Vardy, A., Thibeault, C., & Gross, W.J. (2014). Fast polar decoders: Algorithm and implementation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(5), 946–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sasoglu, E., Telatar, E., & Arikan, E. (2009). Polarization for arbitrary discrete memoryless channels. In Information theory workshop, 2009. ITW 2009 (pp. 144–148): IEEE.Google Scholar
- 18.Tal, I., & Vardy, A. (2015). List decoding of polar codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 61(5), 2213–2226.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zhang, C., & Parhi, K. (2013). Low-latency sequential and overlapped architectures for successive cancellation polar decoder. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 61(10), 2429–2441.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar