A Novel Mitigation Scheme for JTIDS Impulsive Interference on LDACS System Based on Sensing and Symbol Retransmission
- 309 Downloads
Future digital air/ground communication systems (LDACS) will operate on the L-Band where the coexistence with existing legacy systems shall be guaranteed. This paper proposes a scheme to detect and mitigate the JTIDS impulsive interference on LDACS-1 system. The novel idea advised here is the transmission of two copies of the symbols received with interference that are suitably combined at the receiver after a blanking operation of the corrupted samples. In particular two alternatives are presented that differ for the adopted retransmission policy, namely full combining scheme, where all the symbols are transmitted twice, and partial combining scheme, which foresees the retransmission of only those symbols where interference has been detected. Both these methods permit to efficiently remove the interference without affecting the useful information and exploiting profitably the diversity gain against noise through the soft combining approach. The numerical results provided in the paper highlight a good behavior of the proposed methods and significant advantages in comparison with the traditional blanking method, either in terms of Bit Error Rate and throughput.
KeywordsJTIDS LDACS Spectrum sensing Blanking Symbol recombining
- 1.ICAO (2007). Communications operating concept and requirements for the future radio system. ICAO Aeronautical Communications panel. Version 2. Montreal, May 2007.Google Scholar
- 2.SESAR Joint Undertaking. Available: http://www.sesarju.eu/.
- 3.Nextgen project. Available: http://www.faa.gov/nextgen/.
- 4.Bartoli, G., Fantacci, R., Marabissi, D., Micciullo, L., Fossi, M. (2013). An efficient subcarrier allocation method for AeroMACS based communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 49(2), 786–797.Google Scholar
- 5.EUROCONTROL web site. http://www.eurocontrol.int.
- 6.Budsabathon, M., & Hara, S. (2001). Robustness of OFDM signal against temporally localized impulsive noise. In Proceedings VTC 2001 fall vehicular technology conference IEEE VTS 54th, 3, 1672–1676.Google Scholar
- 8.Epple, U., & Schnell, M. (2011). Overview of interference situation and mitigation techniques for LDACS1. In Proceedings IEEE/AIAA 30th digital avionics systems conference (DASC).Google Scholar
- 11.Yong-Hwa, K., Kyong-Hoe, K., Hui-Myoung, O., Kwan-Ho, K., Seong-Cheol, K. (2008). Mitigation of effect of impulsive noise for OFDM systems over power line channels. In Proceedings IEEE International symposium power line communications and its applications ISPLC (pp. 386–390).Google Scholar
- 16.Armstrong, J., & Suraweera, H.A. (2004). Impulse noise mitigation for OFDM using decision directed noise estimation. In IEEE international symposium spread spectrum techniques and applications (pp. 174–178).Google Scholar
- 17.Kitamura, T., Ohno, K., Itami, M. (2011). Iterative impulsive noise reduction by generating its replica signal in OFDM reception. In Proceedings IEEE international consumer electronics (ICCE) conference (pp. 389–390).Google Scholar
- 18.Al-Dweik, A., Hazmi, A., Sharif, B., Tsimenidis, C. (2010). Efficient interleaving technique for OFDM system over impulsive noise channels. In Proceedings IEEE 21st international personal indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) symposium (pp. 167–171).Google Scholar
- 19.Ghasemi, A., & Sousa, E.S. (2008). Spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: requirements, challenges and design trade-offs. IEEE Communications Magazine, 32–39.Google Scholar
- 24.SESAR 15.2.4 ET - Task EWA04-1 T2 (2011). Updated LDACS1 system specification. Aug. 2011.Google Scholar
- 25.JTIDS System Segment Specification (DCB79S4000C).Google Scholar
- 26.European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) (2009). A comparison of the minimum coupling loss method, enhanced minimum coupling loss method, and the Monte-Carlo simulation.Google Scholar
- 27.ITU-R. Recommendation SM.337-4 Frequency and Distance Separations.Google Scholar
- 28.ITU-R. Recommendation SM.329-10 Unwanted emission in spurious domain.Google Scholar
- 29.Bartoli, G., Fantacci, R., Marabissi, D., Micciullo, L., Armani, C., Merlo, R. (2012). Performance evaluation of a spectrum-sensing technique for LDACS and JTIDS coexistence in L-Band. In Proceeding SDR’12—WInnComm-Europe—Wireless innovation forum announces.Google Scholar