A VLSI Architecture of the Square Root Algorithm for V-BLAST Detection

Article
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

MIMO has been proposed as an extension to 3G and Wireless LANs. As an implementation scheme of MIMO systems, V-BLAST is suitable for the applications with very high data rates. The square root algorithm for V-BLAST detection is attractive to hardware implementations due to its low computational complexity and numerical stability. In this paper, the fixed-point implementation of the square root algorithm is analyzed, and a low complexity VLSI architecture is proposed. The proposed architecture is scalable for various configurations, and implemented for a 4 × 4 QPSK V-BLAST system in a 0.35 \(\mu\)m CMOS technology. The chip core covers 9 \(mm^2\) and 190 K gates. The detection throughput of the chip depends on the received symbol packet length. When the packet length is larger than or equal to 100 bytes, it can achieve a maximal detection throughput of 128 \(\sim\) 160 Mb/s at a maximal clock frequency of 80 MHz. The core power consumption, measured at 2.7 V and room temperature, is about 608 mW for 160 Mb/s data rate at 80 MHz, and 81 mW for 20 Mb/s at 10 MHz. The proposed architecture is shown to meet the requirements for emerging MIMO applications, such as 3G HSDPA and IEEE 802.11n.

Keywords

VLSI ASIC MIMO BLAST square root algorithm fixed-point CORDIC 3G HSDPA wireless LAN 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. J. Foschini, “Layered Space-time Architecture for Wireless Communication in Fading Environments when using Multiple Antennas,” Bell Labs. Tech. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 41–59, Autumn 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    3GPP, “Physical Layer Aspects of UTRA High Speed Downlink Packet Access,” 3GPP TR25.848 V4.0.0(2001–2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. K. Jones, G. Raleigh and R. van Nee, “MIMO answers high-rate WLAN call,” http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20031231S0008.
  4. 4.
    P. W. Wolniansky, G. J. Foschini, G. D. Golden and R. A. Valenzuela, “V-BLAST: An Architecture for Realizing Very High Data Rates Over the Rich-scattering Wireless Channel,” in Proc. ISSSE, Pisa, Italy, Sept. 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Bäro, G. Bauch, A. Pavlic and A. Semmler, “Improving BLAST Performance Using Space-time Block Codes and Turbo Decoding,” in IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Hassibi, “An efficient square-root algorithm for BLAST,” http://mars.bell-labs.com/.
  7. 7.
    J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. O. Damen, A. Chkeif and J.-C. Belfiore, “Lattice Code Decoder for Space-time Codes,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 161–163, May 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Garrett, L. Davis, S. ten Brink, and B. Hochwald, “APP Processing for High Performance MIMO Systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 2003 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), San Jose, California, Sept. 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Guo and P. Nilsson, “A VLSI Architecture of the Schnorr-euchner Decoder for MIMO Systems,” in IEEE 6th CAS Symposium on Emerging Technologies: Frontiers of Mobile and Wireless Communication, Shanghai, China, June 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. O. Damen, K. Abed-Meraim, and S. Burykh, “Iterative QR detection for BLAST,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 19, pp. 179–191, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Wubben, R. Bohnke, J. Rinas, V. Kuhn, and K. D. Kammeyer, “Efficient Algorithm for Decoding Layered Space-time Codes,” Electronics Letters, vol. 37, pp. 1348–1350, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Zha and S. D. Blostein, “Modified Decorrelating Decision-feedback Detection of BLAST Space-time System,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 1, pp. 335–339, June 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. H. Golub and C. F. V. Loan, Matrix Computations, 3rd ed. John Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. H. Hu, “CORDIC-based VLSI Architectures for Digital Signal Processing,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, July 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. Wang, H. Suzuki, and K. K. Parhi, “Finite Wordlength Analysis and Adaptive Decoding for Turbo/Map Decoders,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, and Video Technology, vol. 29, pp. 209–221, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Walke, R. Smith, and G. Lightbody, “Architectures for adaptive weight calculation on ASIC and FPGA,” in 33rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Rader, “VLSI Systolic Arrays for Adaptive Nulling,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 29–49, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Lightbody, R. Walke, R. Woods, and J. McCanny, “Linear QR Architecture for a Single Chip Adaptive Beamformer,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, and Video Technology, vol. 24, pp. 67–81, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Valls, M. Kuhlmann, and K. K. Parhi, “Evaluation of CORDIC algorithms for FPGA design,” Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image, and Video Technology, vol. 32, 2002, pp. 207–222.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Guo, “A Short Introduction to ASIC Design Flow in AMIS Library,” online available: http://www.es.lth.se/home/zgo/, April 2003.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    IEEE, “Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications,” IEEE Std 802.11a/D7.0–1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ElectroscienceLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations