International Journal of Computer Vision

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 447–460 | Cite as

Using Basic Image Features for Texture Classification

Article

Abstract

Representing texture images statistically as histograms over a discrete vocabulary of local features has proven widely effective for texture classification tasks. Images are described locally by vectors of, for example, responses to some filter bank; and a visual vocabulary is defined as a partition of this descriptor-response space, typically based on clustering. In this paper, we investigate the performance of an approach which represents textures as histograms over a visual vocabulary which is defined geometrically, based on the Basic Image Features of Griffin and Lillholm (Proc. SPIE 6492(09):1–11, 2007), rather than by clustering. BIFs provide a natural mathematical quantisation of a filter-response space into qualitatively distinct types of local image structure. We also extend our approach to deal with intra-class variations in scale. Our algorithm is simple: there is no need for a pre-training step to learn a visual dictionary, as in methods based on clustering, and no tuning of parameters is required to deal with different datasets. We have tested our implementation on three popular and challenging texture datasets and find that it produces consistently good classification results on each, including what we believe to be the best reported for the KTH-TIPS and equal best reported for the UIUCTex databases.

Keywords

Texture classification Basic Image Features Textons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Broadhurst, R. E. (2005). Statistical estimation of histogram variation for texture classification. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on texture analysis and synthesis (pp. 25–30). Beijing, China, October 2005. Google Scholar
  2. Caputo, B., Hayman, E., & Mallikarjuna, P. (2005). Class-specific material categorisation. In Tenth IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2005. ICCV 2005 (Vol. 2, pp. 1597–1604). Google Scholar
  3. Crosier, M., & Griffin, L. D. (2008). Texture classification with a dictionary of basic image features. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition 2008 (pp. 1–7), June 2008. Google Scholar
  4. Cula, O. G., & Dana, K. J. (2001). Recognition methods for 3d textured surfaces. In Proceedings of SPIE conference on human vision and electronic imaging VI, San Jose, 2001. Google Scholar
  5. Dana, K. J., Van-Ginneken, B., Nayar, S. K., & Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Reflectance and texture of real world surfaces. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 18(1), 1–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freeman, W. T. & Adelson, E. H. (1991). The design and use of steerable filters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(9), 891–906. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Griffin, L. D. (2007). The 2nd order local-image-structure solid. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(8), 1355–1366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffin, L. D. (2008). Symmetries of 1-d images. Journal of Mathematical Imaging & Vision, 31(2–3), 157–164. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin, L. D. & Lillholm, M. (2007). Feature category systems for 2nd order local image structure induced by natural image statistics and otherwise. Proceedings—SPIE, 6492(09), 1–11. Google Scholar
  10. Griffin, L. D., & Lillholm, M. (2008). Classifying local image symmetry using a colocalised family of linear filters. Perception 37 ECVP Abstract Supplement 2008. Google Scholar
  11. Griffin, L. D., Lillholm, M., Crosier, M., & van Sande, J. (2009). Basic image features (BIFs) arising from local symmetry type. In LNCS : Vol. 5567. Proceedings SSVM ’09 (pp. 343–355). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  12. Harris, C. G., & Stephens, M. (1988). A combined corner and edge detector. In Fourth Alvey vision conference (pp. 147–151), Manchester, UK. Google Scholar
  13. Hayman, E., Caputo, B., Fritz, M., & Eklundh, J. (2004). On the significance of real-world conditions for material classification. In ECCV 2004 (pp. 253–266). Google Scholar
  14. Jurie, F., & Triggs, B. (2005). Creating efficient codebooks for visual recognition. In Tenth IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2005. ICCV 2005 (Vol. 1, pp. 604–610). Google Scholar
  15. Konishi, S., & Yuille, A. L. (2000). Statistical cues for domain specific image segmentation with performance analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2000 (Vol. 1, pp. 125–132). Google Scholar
  16. Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2003). A sparse texture representation using affine-invariant regions. In Proceedings of 2003 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2003 (Vol. 2, pp. II-319–II-324). Google Scholar
  17. Leung, T., & Malik, J. (2001). Representing and recognizing the visual appearance of materials using three-dimensional textons. International Journal of Computer Vision, 43(1), 29–44. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lowe, D. G. (1999). Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In The proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision, 1999 (Vol. 2, pp. 1150–1157). Google Scholar
  19. Ojala, T., Maenpaa, T. & Pietikainen, M. (2002). Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(7), 971–987. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thacker, N. A., Aherne, F. J., & Rockett, P. I., (1997). The Bhattacharyya metric as an absolute similarity measure for frequency coded data. Kybernetika, 34(4), 363–368. MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Varma, M., & Garg, R. (2007). Locally invariant fractal features for statistical texture classification. In IEEE 11th international conference on computer vision, 2007. ICCV 2007. Google Scholar
  22. Varma, M., & Ray, D. (2007). Learning the discriminative power-invariance trade-off. In IEEE 11th international conference on computer vision, 2007. Google Scholar
  23. Varma, M., & Zisserman, A. (2009). A statistical approach to material classification using image patch exemplars. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(11), 2032–2047. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Varma, M. & Zisserman, A. (2004). Unifying statistical texture classification frameworks. Image and Vision Computing, 22(14), 1175–1183. Google Scholar
  25. Varma, M. & Zisserman, A. (2005). A statistical approach to texture classification from single images. International Journal of Computer Vision, 62(1), 61–81. Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, J., Marszalek, M., Lazebnik, S., & Schmid, C. (2006). Local features and kernels for classification of texture and object categories: a comprehensive study. In Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshop, 2006 (p. 13). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations