Advertisement

Using the Particle Filter Approach to Building Partial Correspondences Between Shapes

Abstract

Constructing correspondences between points characterizing one shape with those characterizing another is crucial to understanding what the two shapes have in common. These correspondences are the basis for most alignment processes and shape similarity measures. In this paper we use particle filters to establish perceptually correct correspondences between point sets characterizing shapes. Local shape feature descriptors are used to establish the probability that a point on one shape corresponds to a point on the other shape. Global correspondence structures are calculated using additional constraints on domain knowledge. Domain knowledge is characterized by prior distributions which serve to characterize hypotheses about the global relationships between shapes. These hypotheses are formulated online. This means global constraints are learnt during the particle filtering process, which makes the approach especially interesting for applications where global constraints are hard to define a priori. As an example for such a case, experiments demonstrate the performance of our approach on partial shape matching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. Alt, H., Scharf, L., & Scholz, S. (2006). Probabilistic matching of sets of polygonal curves. In Proceedings of the 22nd European workshop on computational geometry (EWCG) (pp. 107–110). Delphi, Greece

  2. Back, T., Hammel, U., & Schwefel, H. P. (1997). Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1, 3–17.

  3. Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002). Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 705–522.

  4. Chen, L., Feris, R., & Turk, M. (2008). Efficient partial shape matching using smith-waterman algorithm. In Computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 2008 CVPRW ’08 IEEE.

  5. Crisan, D., & Doucet, A. (2002). A survey of convergence results on particle filtering methods for practitioners. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(3).

  6. de Bruijne, M., & Nielsen, M. (2004). Image segmentation by shape particle filtering. In ICPR ’04: Proceedings of the pattern recognition, 17th international conference on (ICPR’04) (Vol. 3, pp. 722–725). Washington: IEEE Computer Society.

  7. DelMoral, P., Doucet, A., & Jasra, A. (2007). Sequential Monte Carlo for Bayesian computation. In Bayesian statistics (Vol. 8, pp. 1–34). London: Oxford University Press.

  8. Doucet, A., De Freitas, N., & Gordon, N. (eds.), (2001). Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer.

  9. Doucet, A., DelMoral, P., & Jasra, A. (2006). Sequential Monte Carlo samplers. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society B, 68(3), 411–436.

  10. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

  11. Gorelick, L., Galun, M., & Brandt, A. (2006). Shape representation and classification using the Poisson equation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(12), 1991–2005.

  12. Gower, J., & Dijksterhuis, G. (2005). Procrustes problems (Vol. 70). New York: Springer.

  13. Haralick, R. M., & Shapiro, L. G. (1979). The consistent labeling problem: Part I. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PAMI, 1(2), 173–184.

  14. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  15. Kittler, J., & Illingworth, J. (1986). Relaxation labelling algorithms-a review. Image and Vision Computing, 3(4), 206–216.

  16. Lakaemper, R., & Sobel, M. (2008). Correspondences between parts of shapes with particle filters. In IEEE int. conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR).

  17. Lakaemper, R., Li, S., & Sobel, M. (2008). Partial correspondences of point sets using particle filters. In IAPR int. conf. on pattern recognition (ICPR).

  18. Latecki, L. J., Lakaemper, R., & Eckhardt, U. (2000). Shape descriptors for non-rigid shapes with a single closed contour. In Proc. IEEE conf. computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 424–429).

  19. Latecki, L. J., Wang, Q., Koknar-Tezel, S., & Megalooikonomou, V. (2007). Optimal subsequence bijection. In IEEE int. conf. on data mining (ICDM).

  20. Ling, H., & Jacobs, D. W. (2007). Shape classification using the inner-distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(2), 286–299.

  21. Liu, J. S. (2002). Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. Berlin: Springer.

  22. Liu, J., Chen, R., & Logvinenko, T. (2000). A theoretical framework for sequential importance sampling and resampling (Technical report). Stanford University, Department of Statistics, January 2000.

  23. Milios, E., & Petrakis, E. (2000). Shape retrieval based on dynamic programming. Transactions on Image Processing, 9(1), 141–146.

  24. Mokhtarian, F., Abbasi, S., & Kittler, J. (1996). Robust and efficient shape indexing through curvature scale space. In Proceedings of British machine vision conference (pp. 53–62).

  25. Mokhtarian, F., Khalili, N., & Yuen, P. (2002). Estimation of error in curvature computation on multi-scale free-form surfaces. International Journal of Computer Vision, 48(2), 131–149.

  26. Moral, P. D., Doucet, A., & Jasra, A. (2006). Sequential Monte Carlo samplers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 68(3), 411–436.

  27. Perez, P., Blake, A., & Gangnet, M. (2001). Jetstream: Probabilistic contour extraction with particles. In Proc. of ICCV (pp. 424–531).

  28. Qian, W., & Titterington, D. M. (1992). Stochastic relaxations and em algorithms for Markov random fields. Journal of Statistical Computing and Simulation, 40.

  29. Rathi, Y., Vaswani, N., & Tannenbaum, A. (2007). A generic framework for tracking using particle filter with dynamic shape prior. IP, 16(5), 1370–1382.

  30. Rosenfeld, A., Hummel, R. A., & Zucker, S. W. (1976). Scene labeling by relaxation operations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC, 6(6), 420–433.

  31. Sandhu, R., Dambreville, S., & Tannenbaum, A. (2008). Particle filtering for registration of 2d and 3d point sets with stochastic dynamics.

  32. Schmidt, F., Farin, D., & Cremers, D. (2007). Fast matching of planar shapes in sub-cubic runtime. In IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV).

  33. Scott, C., & Nowak, R. (2006). Robust contour matching via the order-preserving assignment problem. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(7), 1831–1838.

  34. Sebastian, T., Klein, P., & Kimia, B. (2003). On aligning curves. PAMI, 25(1), 116–125.

  35. Siddiqi, K., Shokoufandeh, A., Dickinson, S. J., & Zucker, S. W. (1999). Shock graphs and shape matching. International Journal of Computer Vision, 35(1), 13–32.

  36. Thrun, S. (2002). Particle filters in robotics. In Proceedings of the 17th annual conference on uncertainty in AI (UAI).

  37. Veltkamp, R. C., & Hagedoorn, M. (2001). State-of-the-art in shape matching (Tech. rep.). Principles of visual information retrieval.

  38. Zheng, Y., & Doermann, D. (2006). Robust point matching for nonrigid shapes by preserving local neighborhood structures. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(4), 643–649.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Rolf Lakaemper.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. (WMV 9.3 MB)

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. (WMV 9.3 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lakaemper, R., Sobel, M. Using the Particle Filter Approach to Building Partial Correspondences Between Shapes. Int J Comput Vis 88, 1–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-009-0288-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Shape matching
  • Particle filters
  • Shape recognition
  • Feature correspondences
  • Shape alignment