Image Fusion for Enhanced Visualization: A Variational Approach

Article

Abstract

We present a variational model to perform the fusion of an arbitrary number of images while preserving the salient information and enhancing the contrast for visualization. We propose to use the structure tensor to simultaneously describe the geometry of all the inputs. The basic idea is that the fused image should have a structure tensor which approximates the structure tensor obtained from the multiple inputs. At the same time, the fused image should appear ‘natural’ and ‘sharp’ to a human interpreter. We therefore propose to combine the geometry merging of the inputs with perceptual enhancement and intensity correction. This is performed through a minimization functional approach which implicitly takes into account a set of human vision characteristics.

Keywords

Image fusion Perceptual contrast enhancement Geometry-based fusion Structure tensor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggarval, J. K. (1993). Multisensor fusion for computer vision. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  2. Bertalmío, M., Caselles, V., Provenzi, E., & Rizzi, A. (2007). Perceptual color correction through variational techniques. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16(4), 1058–1072. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt, P. J. (1984). The pyramid as a structure for efficient computation. In A. Rosenfeld (Ed.), Multiresolution image processing and analysis (pp. 6–35). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  4. Burt, P. J., & Kolczynski, R. J. (1993). Enhanced image capture through fusion. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on computer vision (pp. 173–182). Berlin, Germany, May. Google Scholar
  5. Cumani, A. (1991). Edge detection in multispectral images. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 53(1), 40–51. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Zenzo, S. (1986). A note on the gradient of multi-image. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 33, 116–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haber, E., & Modersitzki, J. (2007). Intensity gradient based registration and fusion of multi-modal images. In Methods of information in medicine (pp. 726–733). Stuttgart: Schattauer. Google Scholar
  8. Harikumar, G., & Bresler, Y. (1996). Feature extraction for exploratory visualization of vector valued imagery. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5(9), 1324–1334. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill, D., Edwards, P., & Hawkes, D. (1994). Fusing medical images. Image Processing, 6(2), 22–24. Google Scholar
  10. Jost, J. (2002). Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis. Berlin: Springer. MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, H., Manjunath, B. S., & Mitra, S. K. (1995). Multisensor image fusion using the wavelet transform. Graphical Models and Image Processing, 57(3), 235–245. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manduca, A. (1996). Multispectral image visualization with nonlinear projections. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5(10), 1486–1490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Petrovic, V. S. (2007). Subjective tests for image fusion evaluation and objective metric validation. Information Fusion, 8(2), 208–216. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Piella, G. (2003). A general framework for multiresolution image fusion: from pixels to regions. Information Fusion, 9, 259–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piella, G., & Heijmans, H. J. A. M. (2003). A new quality metric for image fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2, 173–176. Barcelona, Spain, September 14–17. Google Scholar
  16. Qu, G. H., Zhang, D. L., & Yan, P. F. (2001). Medical image fusion by wavelet transform modulus maxima. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 9(4), 184–190. Google Scholar
  17. Rogers, S. K., Wilson, T. A., & Kabrisky, M. (1997). Perceptual-based image for hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(4), 1007–1017. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scheunders, P., & De Backer, S. (2001). Fusion and merging of multispectral images using multiscale fundamental forms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 18(10), 2468–2477. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Socolinsky, D. A., & Wolff, L. B. (2002). Multispectral image visualization through first-order fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 11(8), 923–931. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., & Simoncelli, E. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error measurement to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–613. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weickert, J. (1998). Anisotropic diffusion in image processing. Stuttgart: Teubner. MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pompeu Fabra UniversityBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations