Advertisement

International Journal of Computer Vision

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 195–215 | Cite as

A Review of Statistical Approaches to Level Set Segmentation: Integrating Color, Texture, Motion and Shape

  • Daniel Cremers
  • Mikael Rousson
  • Rachid Deriche
Article

Abstract

Since their introduction as a means of front propagation and their first application to edge-based segmentation in the early 90’s, level set methods have become increasingly popular as a general framework for image segmentation. In this paper, we present a survey of a specific class of region-based level set segmentation methods and clarify how they can all be derived from a common statistical framework.

Region-based segmentation schemes aim at partitioning the image domain by progressively fitting statistical models to the intensity, color, texture or motion in each of a set of regions. In contrast to edge-based schemes such as the classical Snakes, region-based methods tend to be less sensitive to noise. For typical images, the respective cost functionals tend to have less local minima which makes them particularly well-suited for local optimization methods such as the level set method.

We detail a general statistical formulation for level set segmentation. Subsequently, we clarify how the integration of various low level criteria leads to a set of cost functionals. We point out relations between the different segmentation schemes. In experimental results, we demonstrate how the level set function is driven to partition the image plane into domains of coherent color, texture, dynamic texture or motion. Moreover, the Bayesian formulation allows to introduce prior shape knowledge into the level set method. We briefly review a number of advances in this domain.

Keywords

image segmentation level set methods Bayesian inference color texture motion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amiaz, T. and Kiryati, N. 2005. Dense discontinuous optical flow via contour-based segmentation. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing, Lausanne, vol 4, pp. 1264–1267.Google Scholar
  2. Aubert, G., Barlaud M., Faugeras, O., and Jehan-Besson, S. 2003. Image segmentation using active contours: Calculus of variations or shape gradients? SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 63(6):2128–2154.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Besag, J. 1986. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B., 48(3):259–302.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigün, J. and Granlund G. 1987. Optimal orientation detection of linear symmetry. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computer Vision, London, England, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 433–438.Google Scholar
  5. Bigün, J., Granlund, G.H., and Wiklund, J. 1991. Multidimensional orientation estimation with applications to texture analysis and optical flow. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 13(8):775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake, A. and Zisserman, A. 1987. Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boykov, Y., Veksler O., and Zabih, R. 2001. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 23(11):1222–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brox, T., Bruhn, A., Papenberg, N., and Weickert, J. 2004. High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping. In T. Pajdla and V. Hlavac, (Eds.), European Conf. on Computer Vision, Vol. 3024 of LNCS, Prague Springer, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
  9. Brox, T., Bruhn, A., and Weickert, J. 2006. Variational motion segmentation with level sets. In A. Leonardis, H. Bischof and A. Pinz (Eds.), European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Graz, Austria, Springer, LNCS, Vol. 3951, pp. 471–483.Google Scholar
  10. Brox, T., Rousson, M., Deriche, R., and Weickert, J. 2003. Unsupervised segmentation incorporating colour, texture, and motion. In N. Petkov and M. A. Westenberg (Eds.), Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, vol. 2756 of LNCS, Groningen, The Netherlands Springer, pp. 353–360.Google Scholar
  11. Brox, T. and Weickert, J. 2004. Level set based image segmentation with multiple regions. In H. Bülthoff, M. Giese, and B. Schölkopf (Eds.), In Pattern Recognition, Springer LNCS 3175, C.-E. Rasmussen 26th DAGM, Tübingen, Germany, pp. 415–423.Google Scholar
  12. Brox, T. and Weickert, J. 2004. A TV flow based local scale measure for texture discrimination. In T. Pajdla and V. Hlavac, (eds.), European Conf. on Computer Vision, Vol. 3022 of LNCS, Prague,Springer, pp. 578–590.Google Scholar
  13. Caselles, V., Catté, F., Coll, T., and Dibos, F. 1993. A geometric model for active contours in image processing. Numer. Math., 66:1–31.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., and Sapiro, G. 1995. Geodesic active contours. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Comp. Vis., Boston, USA, pp. 694–699.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, T.F., and Vese, L.A. 2001. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 10(2):266–277.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Charpiat, G., Faugeras, O., and Keriven, R. 2005. Approximations of shape metrics and application to shape warping and empirical shape statistics. Journal of Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 5(1):1–58.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, Y., Tagare, H., Thiruvenkadam, S., Huang, F., Wilson, D., Gopinath, K. S., Briggs, R.W., and Geiser, E. 2002. Using shape priors in geometric active contours in a variational framework. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 50(3):315–328.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. De Cock, K. and De Moor, B. 2000. Subspace angles between linear stochastic models. In Int. Conf. on Decision and Control, vol 2, pp. 1561–1566.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, L.D. and Cohen, I. 1993. Finite-element methods for active contour models and balloons for 2-d and 3-d images. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 15(11):1131–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cremers, D. 2003. A variational framework for image segmentation combining motion estimation and shape regularization. In C. Dyer and P. Perona (Eds.), IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog., vol 1, pp. 53–58.Google Scholar
  21. Cremers, D. 2006. Dynamical statistical shape priors for level set based tracking. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 28(8):1262–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cremers, D., Kohlberger, T., and Schnörr, C. 2002. Nonlinear shape statistics in Mumford–Shah based segmentation. In A. Heyden et al. (Eds.), Europ. Conf. on Comp. Vis., vol. 2351 of LNCS, Copenhagen Springer, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
  23. Cremers, D., Osher, S.J., and Soatto, S. 2006. Kernel density estimation and intrinsic alignment for shape priors in level set segmentation. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 69(3):335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cremers, D. and Schnörr, C. 2002. Motion Competition: Variational integration of motion segmentation and shape regularization. In L. van Gool (Ed.), Pattern Recognition, vol. 2449 of LNCS, Zürich, Springer, pp. 472–480.Google Scholar
  25. Cremers, D. and Soatto, S. 2003. Variational space-time motion segmentation. In B. Triggs and A. Zisserman (Eds.), IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Nice, vol. 2, pp. 886–892.Google Scholar
  26. Cremers, D., and Soatto, S. 2005. Motion Competition: A variational framework for piecewise parametric motion segmentation. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 62(3):249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cremers, D., Sochen, N., and Schnörr, C. 2006. A multiphase dynamic labeling model for variational recognition-driven image segmentation. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 66(1):67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cremers, D., Tischhäuser, F., Weickert, J., and Schnörr, C. 2002. Diffusion Snakes: Introducing statistical shape knowledge into the Mumford–Shah functional. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 50(3):295–313.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Cremers, D. and Yuille, A.L. 2003. A generative model based approach to motion segmentation. In B. Michaelis and G. Krell (Eds.), Pattern Recognition, vol. 2781 of LNCS, Magdeburg, Springer, pp. 313–320.Google Scholar
  30. Cross, G. and Jain, A. 1983. Markov random field texture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 5:25–39.Google Scholar
  31. de Luis García, R., Deriche, R., Rousson, M., and Alberola-López, C. 2005. Tensor processing for texture and colour segmentation. Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis 2005: 1117–1127.Google Scholar
  32. Delingette, H., and Montagnat, J. 2000. New algorithms for controlling active contours shape and topology. In D. Vernon, (Ed.), Proc. of the Europ. Conf. on Comp. Vis., vol. 1843, of LNCS, Springer, pp. 381–395.Google Scholar
  33. Dervieux, A. and Thomasset, F. 1979. A finite element method for the simulation of Raleigh-Taylor instability. Springer Lect. Notes in Math., 771:145–158.Google Scholar
  34. Dervieux, A. and Thomasset, F. 1981. Multifluid incompressible flows by a finite element method. Lecture Notes in Physics, 11:158–163Google Scholar
  35. Doretto, G., Chiuso, A., Wu, Y.N., and Soatto, S. 2003. Dynamic textures. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 51(2):91–109.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Doretto, G., Cremers, D., Favaro, P., and Soatto, S. 2003. Dynamic texture segmentation. In B. Triggs and A. Zisserman (Eds.), IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Nice, vol 2, pp. 1236–1242.Google Scholar
  37. Duci, A., Yezzi, A., Mitter, S., and Soatto, S. 2003. Shape representation via harmonic embedding. In ICCV, pp. 656–662.Google Scholar
  38. Förstner, M.A., and Gülch, E. 1987. A fast operator for detection and precise location of distinct points, corners and centers of circular features. In Proceedings of the Intercommission Workshop of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Interlaken, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  39. Geman, S. and Geman, D. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 6(6):721–741.MATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Grady, L. 2006. Random walks for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., to appear.Google Scholar
  41. Granlund, G.H. and Knutsson, H. 1995. Signal Processing for Computer Vision, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Grenander, U., Chow, Y., and Keenan, D.M. 1991. Hands: A Pattern Theoretic Study of Biological Shapes, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Hassner, M. and Sklansky, J. 1980. The use of Markov random fields as models of texture. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 12:357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heiler, M. and Schnoerr, C. 2003. Natural image statistics for natural image segmentation. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 1259–1266Google Scholar
  45. Herbulot, A., Jehan-Besson, S., Barlaud, M., and Aubert, G. 2004. Shape gradient for multi-modal image segmentation using mutual information. In Int. Conf. on Image Processing.Google Scholar
  46. Ising, E. 1925. Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik, 23:253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jehan-Besson, S., Barlaud, M., and Aubert, G. 2003. DREAM2S: Deformable regions driven by an eulerian accurate minimization method for image and video segmentation. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 53(1):45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jepson, A., and Black, M.J. 1993. Mixture models for optic flow computation. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., pp. 760–761.Google Scholar
  49. Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. 1988. Snakes: Active contour models. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 1(4):321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keuchel, J., Schnörr, C., Schellewald, C., and Cremers, D. 2003. Binary partitioning, perceptual grouping, and restoration with semidefinite programming. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 25(11):1364–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kichenassamy, S., Kumar, A., Olver, P.J., Tannenbaum, A., and Yezzi, A. J. 1995. Gradient flows and geometric active contour models. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 810–815.Google Scholar
  52. Kim, J., Fisher, J.W., Yezzi, A., Cetin, M. and Willsky, A. 2002. Nonparametric methods for image segmentation using information theory and curve evolution. In Int. Conf. on Image Processing, vol. 3, pp. 797–800.Google Scholar
  53. Lachaud, J.-O. and Montanvert, A. 1999. Deformable meshes with automated topology changes for coarse-to-fine three-dimensional surface extraction. Medical Image Analysis, 3(2):187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leclerc, Y.G. 1989. Constructing simple stable description for image partitioning. The International Journal of Computer Vision, 3(1):73–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leitner, F. and Cinquin, P. 1991. Complex topology 3d objects segmentation. In SPIE Conf. on Advances in Intelligent Robotics Systems, Boston, vol. 1609.Google Scholar
  56. Lenglet, C., Rousson, M., and Deriche, R. 2004. Toward segmentation of 3D probability density fields by surface evolution: Application to diffusion MRI. INRIA Research Report.Google Scholar
  57. Lenglet, C., Rousson, M., Deriche, R., and Faugeras, O. 2004. Statistics on multivariate normal distributions: A geometric approach and its application to diffusion tensor MRI. INRIA Research Report.Google Scholar
  58. Leung, T. and Malik, J. 2001. Representing and recognizing the visual appearance of materials using three-dimensional textons. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 43(1):29–44.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. Leventon, M., Grimson, W., and Faugeras, O. 2000. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In Int. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hilton Head Island, SC, vol. 1, pp. 316–323.Google Scholar
  60. Lindeberg, T. 1994. Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Malik, J., Belongie, S., Leung, T., and Shi, J. 2001. Contour and texture analysis for image segmentation. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 43(1):7–27.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. Malladi, R., Sethian, J.A., and Vemuri, B.C. 1994a. Evolutionary fronts for topology-independent shape modeling and recovery. In Europ. Conf. on Computer Vision, vol. 1, pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
  63. Malladi, R., Sethian, J.A., and Vemuri, B.C. 1994b. A topology independent shape modeling scheme. In SPIE Conf. on Geometric Methods in Comp. Vision II, vol. 2031, pp. 246–258.Google Scholar
  64. Mallat, S. 1989. Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of L 2(R). Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 315:69–87.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. Mansouri, A., Mitiche, A., and Feghali, R. 2002. Spatio-temporal motion segmentation via level set partial differential equations. In Proc. of the 5th IEEE Southewst Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation (SSIAI), Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  66. Martin, P., Refregier, P., Goudail, F., and Guerault, F. 2004. Influence of the noise model on level set active contour segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 26(6):799–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McInerney, T. and Terzopoulos, D. 1995. Topologically adaptable snakes. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Los Alamitos, California, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, pp. 840–845.Google Scholar
  68. Mumford, D., and Shah, J. 1989. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 42:577–685.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. Nain, D., Yezzi, A., and Turk, G. 2003. Vessel segmentation using a shape driven flow. In Intl. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Comp. Ass. Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
  70. Osher, S.J., and Sethian, J.A. 1988. Fronts propagation with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations. J. of Comp. Phys., 79:12–49.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. Paragios, N. and Deriche, R. 2002. Geodesic active regions: a new paradigm to deal with frame partition problems in computer vision. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 13(1/2):249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Paragios, N. and Deriche, R. 2005. Geodesic active regions and level set methods for motion estimation and tracking. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 97(3):259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pennec, X., Fillard, P., and Ayache, N. 2005. A Riemannian framework for tensor computing. International Journal of Computer Vision, 65(1).Google Scholar
  74. Perkins, W.A. 1980. Area segmentation of images using edge points. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 2(1):8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rao, A.R., and Schunck, B.G. 1991. Computing oriented texture fields. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 53:157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rochery, M., Jermyn, I., and Zerubia, J. 2006. Higher order active contours. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 69(1): 1573–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rousson, M. 2004. Cues Integrations and Front Evolutions in Image Segmentation. PhD thesis, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis.Google Scholar
  78. Rousson, M., Brox, T., and Deriche, R. 2003. Active unsupervised texture segmentation on a diffusion based feature space. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., Madison, WI, pp. 699–704.Google Scholar
  79. Rousson, M. and Cremers, D. 2005. Efficient kernel density estimation of shape and intensity priors for level set segmentation. In Intl. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Comp. Ass. Intervention (MICCAI), vol. 1, pp. 757–764.Google Scholar
  80. Rousson, M. and Deriche, R. 2002. A variational framework for active and adaptative segmentation of vector valued images. RR 4515, INRIA.Google Scholar
  81. Rousson, M. and Deriche, R. 2002. A variational framework for active and adaptive segmentation of vector valued images. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing, Orlando, Florida, pp. 56–62.Google Scholar
  82. Rousson, M., Lenglet, C., and Deriche, R. 2004. Level set and region based surface propagation for diffusion tensor MRI segmentation. In Computer Vision Approaches to Medical Image Analysis (CVAMIA) and Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA) Workshop, Prague.Google Scholar
  83. Rousson, M. and Paragios, N. 2002. Shape priors for level set representations. In A. Heyden et al. (Eds.), Europ. Conf. on Comp. Vis., Springer, vol. 2351 of LNCS, pp. 78–92.Google Scholar
  84. Rousson, M., Paragios, N., and Deriche, R. 2004. Implicit active shape models for 3d segmentation in MRI imaging. In Intl. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Comp. Ass. Intervention (MICCAI), Springer, vol. 2217 of LNCS, pp. 209–216.Google Scholar
  85. Samson, C., Blanc-Feraud, L., Aubert, G., and Zerubia, J. 2000. A variational model for image classification and restoration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(5):460–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schnoerr, C. 1992. Computation of discontinuous optical flow by domain decomposition and shape optimization. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 8(2):153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shi, J. and Malik, J. 2000. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(8):888–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Simoncelli, P., Freeman, W., Adelson, H., and Heeger, J. 1992. Shiftable multiscale transforms. IEEE trans. on Information Theory, 38:587–607.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  89. Skovgaard, L.T. 1984. A Riemannian geometry of the multivariate normal model. Scand. J. Statistics, 11:211–223.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  90. Sokolowski, J. and Zolesio, J.P. 1991. Introduction to shape optimization. Computational Mathematics. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  91. Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., Wells, W., Tempany, C., Tucker, D., Fan, A., Grimson, E., and Willsky, A. 2001. Model–based curve evolution technique for image segmentation. In Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., Kauai, Hawaii. pp. 463–468.Google Scholar
  92. Tsai, A., Yezzi, A.J., and Willsky, A.S. 2001. Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 10(8):1169–1186.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  93. Tsai, A., Yezzi, A. J., and Willsky, A. S. 2003. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 22(2):137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tschumperlé, D. and Deriche, R. 2001a. Diffusion tensor regularization with constraints preservation. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Kauai Marriott, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  95. Tschumperlé, D. and Deriche, R. 2001b. Regularization of orthonormal vector sets using coupled PDE’s. In IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  96. Unal, G., Krim, H., and Yezzi, A.Y. 2005. Information-theoretic active polygons for unsupervised texture segmentation. Int. J. of Computer Vision.Google Scholar
  97. Vese, L.A., 2003. Multiphase object detection and image segmentation. In S. J. Osher and N. Paragios (Eds.), Geometric Level Set Methods in Imaging, Vision and Graphics, New York, Springer, pp. 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vese, L.A., and Chan, T.F. 2002. A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah model. The International Journal of Computer Vision, 50(3):271–293.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang, J.Y.A., and Adelson, E.H. 1994. Representating moving images with layers. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 3(5):625–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wang, Z. and Vemuri, B.C. 2004. An affine invariant tensor dissimilarity measure and its application to tensor-valued image segmentation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  101. Weickert, J. and Brox, T. 2002. Diffusion and regularization of vector and matrix-valued images. In Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 313, pp. 251–268.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  102. Yezzi, A., Tsai, A., and Willsky, A. 1999. A statistical approach to snakes for bimodal and trimodal imagery. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkyra, Greece, vol. II, pp. 898–903.Google Scholar
  103. Di Zenzo, S. 1986. A note on the gradient of a multi-image. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 33:116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhao, H.-K., Chan, T., Merriman, B., and Osher, S. 1996. A variational level set approach to multiphase motion. J. of Comp. Phys., 127:179–195.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  105. Zhu, S.C., Wu, Y., and Mumford, D. 1998. Filters, random fields and maximum entropy (frame). The International Journal of Computer Vision, 27(2):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhu, S.C. and Yuille, A. 1996. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, and Bayes/MDL for multiband image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 18(9):884–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Cremers
    • 1
  • Mikael Rousson
    • 2
  • Rachid Deriche
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BonnGermany
  2. 2.Department of Imaging and VisualizationSiemens Corporate ResearchPrincetonUSA
  3. 3.INRIASophia-AntipolisFrance

Personalised recommendations