Efficient Belief Propagation for Early Vision
Markov random field models provide a robust and unified framework for early vision problems such as stereo and image restoration. Inference algorithms based on graph cuts and belief propagation have been found to yield accurate results, but despite recent advances are often too slow for practical use. In this paper we present some algorithmic techniques that substantially improve the running time of the loopy belief propagation approach. One of the techniques reduces the complexity of the inference algorithm to be linear rather than quadratic in the number of possible labels for each pixel, which is important for problems such as image restoration that have a large label set. Another technique speeds up and reduces the memory requirements of belief propagation on grid graphs. A third technique is a multi-grid method that makes it possible to obtain good results with a small fixed number of message passing iterations, independent of the size of the input images. Taken together these techniques speed up the standard algorithm by several orders of magnitude. In practice we obtain results that are as accurate as those of other global methods (e.g., using the Middlebury stereo benchmark) while being nearly as fast as purely local methods.
Keywordsbelief propagation Markov random fields stereo image restoration efficient algorithms
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blake, A. and Zisserman, A. 1987. Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Borgefors G. 1986. Distance transformations in digital images. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 34(3):344–371.Google Scholar
- Felzenszwalb, P.F. and Huttenlocher, D.P. 2004. Distance transforms of sampled functions. Cornell Computing and Information Science Technical Report TR2004-1963.Google Scholar
- Scharstein, D. and Szeliski, R. 2002. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. International Journal of Computer Vision, 47(1):7–42.Google Scholar
- Tappen, M.F. and Freeman, W.T. 2003. Comparison of graph cuts with belief propagation for stereo, using identical MRF parameters. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.Google Scholar
- Wells, W.M. 1986. Efficient systhesis of gaussian filters by cascaded uniform filters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8(2):234–239.Google Scholar
- Willsky, A.S. 2002. Multiresolution markov models for signal and image processing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(8):1396–1458.Google Scholar