Advertisement

Veterinary Research Communications

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 183–194 | Cite as

‘Nano-immuno test’ for the detection of live Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis bacilli in the milk samples using magnetic nano-particles and chromogen

  • Manju Singh
  • Shoor Vir Singh
  • Saurabh Gupta
  • Kundan Kumar Chaubey
  • Bjorn John Stephan
  • Jagdip Singh Sohal
  • Manali Dutta
Original Article

Abstract

Early rapid detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) bacilli in milk samples is the major challenge since traditional culture method is time consuming and laboratory dependent. We report a simple, sensitive and specific nano-technology based ‘Nano-immuno test’ capable of detecting viable MAP bacilli in the milk samples within 10 h. Viable MAP bacilli were captured by MAP specific antibody-conjugated magnetic nano-particles using resazurin dye as chromogen. Test was optimized using true culture positive (10-bovine and 12-goats) and true culture negative (16-bovine and 25-goats) raw milk samples. Domestic livestock species in India are endemically infected with MAP. After successful optimization, sensitivity and specificity of the ‘nano-immuno test’ in goats with respect to milk culture was 91.7% and 96.0%, respectively. Whereas, it was 90.0% (sensitivity) and 92.6% (specificity) with respect to IS900 PCR. In bovine milk samples, sensitivity and specificity of ‘nano-immuno test’ with respect to milk culture was 90.0% and 93.7%, respectively. However, with respect to IS900 PCR, the sensitivity and specificity was 88.9% and 94.1%, respectively. Test was validated with field raw milk samples (goats-258 and bovine-138) collected from domestic livestock species to detect live/viable MAP bacilli. Of 138 bovine raw milk samples screened by six diagnostic tests, 81 (58.7%) milk samples were positive for MAP infection in one or more than one diagnostic tests. Of 81 (58.7%) positive bovine raw milk samples, only 24 (17.4%) samples were detected positive for the presence of viable MAP bacilli. Of 258 goats raw milk samples screened by six diagnostic tests, 141 (54.6%) were positive for MAP infection in one or more than one test. Of 141 (54.6%) positive raw milk samples from goats, only 48 (34.0%) were detected positive for live MAP bacilli. Simplicity and efficiency of this novel ‘nano-immuno test’ makes it suitable for wide-scale screening of milk samples in the field. Standardization, validation and re-usability of functionalized nano-particles and the test was successfully achieved in field samples. Test was highly specific, simple to perform and easy to read by naked eyes and does not require laboratory support in the performance of test. Test has potential to be used as screening test to estimate bio-load of MAP in milk samples at National level.

Keywords

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis Magnetic nano-particles Resazurin dye Nano-immuno diagnostic test Milk 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to MoFPI, New Delhi for providing the funds and Director, CIRG, Mathura for providing necessary facilities.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of Interest to declare.

References

  1. Acharya KR, Dhand NK, Whittington RJ, Plain KM (2017) Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in powdered infant formula using IS900 quantitative PCR and liquid culture media. Int J Food Microbiol 257:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alajmi A, Klein G, Grabowski NT, Fohler S, Akineden Ö, Abdulmawjood A (2016) Evaluation of a commercial real-time PCR kit for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in milk. Curr Microbiol 73:668–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll J, Douarre P, Coffey A, Buckley J, Cashman B, O'Farrell K, O'Mahony J (2009) Optimization of a rapid viability assay for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by using alamarBlue. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7870–7872CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamberlin W, Ghobrial G, Chehtane M, Naser SA (2007) Successful treatment of a Crohn's disease patient infected with bacteremic Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am J Gastroenterol 102:689–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaubey KK, Gupta RD, Gupta S, Singh SV, Bhatia AK, Jayaraman S, Kumar N, Goel A, Rathore AS, Sahzad, Sohal JS, Stephen BJ, Singh M, Goyal M, Dhama K, Derakhshandeh A (2016) Trends and advances in the diagnosis and control of paratuberculosis in domestic livestock. Vet Q 36:203–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cirone K, Morsella C, Romano M, Paolicchi F (2007) Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in food and its relationship with Crohn's disease. Rev Argent Microbiol 39:57–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins MT (2002) Interpretation of a commercial bovine Paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood ratios. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:1367–1371PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Djonne B, Jensen MR, Grant IR, Holstad G (2003) Detection by immunomagnetic PCR of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk from dairy goats in Norway. Vet Microbiol 92:135–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Foddai A, Elliott CT, Grant IR (2010) Maximizing capture efficiency and specificity of magnetic separation for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7550–7558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Foddai A, Strain S, Whitlock RH, Elliott CT, Grant IR (2011) Application of a peptide-mediated magnetic separation-phage assay for detection of viable Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis to bovine bulk tank milk and feces samples. J Clin Microbiol 49:2017–2019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilardoni LR, Fernández B, Morsella C, Mendez L, Jar AM, Paolicchi FA, Mundo SL (2016) Mycobacterium paratuberculosis detection in cow's milk in Argentina by immunomagnetic separation-PCR. Braz J Microbiol 47:506–512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Grant I (2016) Diagnostic potential of a peptide-mediated magnetic separation (PMS)-phage assay applied to milk relative to faecal and blood based tests. INRA-2016Google Scholar
  13. Grant IR, Pope CM, O’Riordan LM, Ball HJ, Rowe MT (2000) Improved detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk by immunomagnetic PCR. Vet Microbiol 77:369–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant IR, Foddai AC, Tarrant JC, Kunkel B, Hartmann FA, McGuirk S, Hansen C, Talaat AM, Collins MT (2017) Viable Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis isolated from calf milk replacer. J Dairy Sci 100:9723–9735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Husakova M, Dziedzinska R, Slana I (2017) Magnetic separation methods for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in various types of matrices: a review. BioMed Res Int  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5869854
  16. Joo J, Yim C, Kwon D, Lee J, Shin HH, Cha HJ, Jeon S (2012) A facile and sensitive detection of pathogenic bacteria using magnetic nanoparticles and optical nanocrystal probes. Analyst 137:3609–3612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Metzger-Boddien C, Khaschabi D, Schönbauer M, Boddien S, Schlederer T, Kehle J (2006) Automated high-throughput immunomagnetic separation-PCR for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine milk. Int J Food Microbiol 110:201–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Naser SA, Sagramsingh SR, Naser AS, Thanigachalam S (2014) Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis causes Crohn's disease in some inflammatory bowel disease patients. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 20:7403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. O'Brien LM, McAloon CG, Stewart LD, Strain SA, Grant IR (2017) Diagnostic potential of the peptide-mediated magnetic separation (PMS)-phage assay and PMS-culture to detect Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine milk samples. Transbound Emerg Dis 17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12794
  20. Patel A, Shah N (2011) Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis—incidences in milk and milk products, their isolation, enumeration, characterization, and role in human health. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 44:473–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pierce ES (2010) Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: is Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis the common villain? Gut Path 2:21–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pooley HB, de Silva K, Purdie AC, Begg DJ, Whittington RJ, Plain KM (2016) A rapid method for quantifying viable Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cellular infection assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5553–5562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Ricchi M, De Cicco C, Kralik P, Babak V, Boniotti MB, Savi R, Cerutti G, Cammi G, Garbarino C, Arrigoni N (2014) Evaluation of viable Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk using peptide-mediated separation and Propidium Monoazide qPCR. FEMS Microbiol Lett 356:127–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Scanu AM, Bull TJ, Cannas S, Sanderson JD, Sechi LA, Dettori G, Zanetti S, Hermon-Taylor J (2007) Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in cases of irritable bowel syndrome and comparison with Crohn's disease and Johne's disease: common neural and immune pathogenicities. J Clin Microbiol 45:3883–3890CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh SV, Singh AV, Singh PK, Sohal JS, Singh NP (2007) Evaluation of an indigenous ELISA for diagnosis of Johne's disease and its comparison with commercial kits. Indian J Microbiol 47:251–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh AV, Singh SV, Makharia GK, Singh PK, Sohal JS (2008) Presence and characterization of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis from clinical and suspected cases of Crohn's disease and in the healthy human population in India. Int J Infect Dis 12:190–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh SV, Singh PK, Singh AV, Sohal JS, Kumar N (2014) Bio-load and bio-type profiles of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in the domestic livestock population endemic for Johne's disease: a survey of 28 years (1985-2013) in India. Transbound Emerg Dis 61:43–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh SV, Stephen BJ, Singh M, Gupta S, Chaubey KK, Sahzad JS, Sachan TK, Aseri GK, Jain M, Sohal JS, Dhama K (2016a) Evaluation of indirect fluorescent antibody test (i_FAT) as the ‘mass screening test’ for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in the milk samples of lactating domestic livestock. J Exp Biol Agri Sci 4(5):533–540Google Scholar
  29. Singh SV, Stephen BJ, Singh M, Gupta S, Chaubey KK, Sahzad, Jayaraman S, Aseri GK, Sohal JS, Bhatia AK, Chauhan J, Dhama K (2016b) Evaluation of milk dot-ELISA as field based test Vis a Vis milk plate ELISA for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) in lactating domestic livestock. Indian J Biotechnol 15:166–171Google Scholar
  30. Singh SV, Stephen BJ, Singh M, Gupta S, Chaubey KK, Sahzad, Jayaraman S, Sachan TK, Sohal JS, Dhama K, Mukartal SY, Hemati Z (2016c) Comparison of newly standardized ‘latex milk agglutination test’, with ‘indigenous milk ELISA’ for ‘on spot’ screening of domestic livestock against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection. Indian J Biotechnol 15:511–517Google Scholar
  31. Singh AV, Chauhan DS, Singh SV, Kumar V, Singh A, Yadav A, Yadav VS (2016d) Current status of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in animals & humans in India: What needs to be done? Indian J Med Res 144:661–671CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh SV, Kuenstner JT, Davis WC, Agarwal P, Kumar N, Singh D, Gupta S, Chaubey KK, Kumar A, Misri J, Jayaraman S (2016e) Concurrent resolution of chronic diarrhea likely due to Crohn’s disease and infection with Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis. Front Med 3  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2016.00049.
  33. Slana I, Paolicchi F, Janstova B, Navratilova P, Pavlik I (2008) Detection methods for Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in milk and milk products: a review. Veter Med-Praha 53:283–306Google Scholar
  34. Smith RL, Gröhn YT, Pradhan AK, Whitlock RH, Van Kessel JS, Smith JM, Schukken YH (2016) The effects of progressing and nonprogressing Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infection on milk production in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 99:1383–1390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stabel JR, Lambertz A (2004) Efficacy of pasteurization conditions for the inactivation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk. J Food Prot 67:2719–2726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stephen BJ, Datta M, Jain M, Jayaraman S, Chaubey KK, Gupta S, Singh M, Aseri GK, Khare N, Yadav P (2015) Nanotechnological approaches for the detection of mycobacteria with special references to Mycobacterium avium subspecies Paratuberculosis (MAP). Asian J Anim Vet Adv 10:518–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stephen B, Singh M, Singh S, Gupta S, Chaubey K, Sahzad, Sohal JS, Dhama K (2016) Bio-contamination’estimates of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in fresh cottage cheese (paneer) sold in rural, semi-urban and peri-urban regions of South Uttar Pradesh using multiple diagnostic tests. Adv Anim Vet Sci 4:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stratmann J, Dohmann K, Heinzmann J, Gerlach GF (2006) Peptide aMptD-mediated capture PCR for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bulk milk samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5150–5158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Van den Driessche F, Rigole P, Brackman G, Coenye T (2014) Optimization of resazurin-based viability staining for quantification of microbial biofilms. J Microbiol Methods 98:31–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. van Soolingen D, Hermans PW, de Haas PE, Soll DR, van Embden JD (1991) Occurrence and stability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 29:2578PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Vary PH, Andersen PR, Green E, Hermon-Taylor J, McFadden JJ (1990) Use of highly specific DNA probes and the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in Johne’s disease. J Clin Microbiol 28:933–937PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Wadhwa A, Foote RS, Shaw RW, Eda S (2012) Bead-based microfluidic immunoassay for diagnosis of Johne's disease. J Imuno Methods 382:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wynne JW, Bull TJ, Seemann T, Bulach DM, Wagner J, Kirkwood CD, Michalski WP (2011) Exploring the zoonotic potential of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis through comparative genomics. PLoS One 6:e22171.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022171 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manju Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shoor Vir Singh
    • 1
  • Saurabh Gupta
    • 1
  • Kundan Kumar Chaubey
    • 1
  • Bjorn John Stephan
    • 3
  • Jagdip Singh Sohal
    • 2
  • Manali Dutta
    • 2
  1. 1.Microbiology Laboratory, Animal Health DivisionCentral Institute for Research on GoatsMathuraIndia
  2. 2.AIMT & AIBAmity University of RajasthanJaipurIndia
  3. 3.Manipal University-Jaipur CampusJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations