Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis
- 114 Downloads
This report describes the use of cell mediated immunity to improve specificity of current diagnosis for Brucella suis. Diagnosis is problematic due to cross reactions that lead to false positive serological reactions (FPSR) in the standard diagnostic tests. A common cause of this cross reactivity is infection with the organism Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Gottingen™ mini-pigs were experimentally infected with B. suis biovar I field strain or Y. enterocolitica serotype O:9 biotype 3. Infection was followed for 70 days. During this time whole blood stimulation assays were set up using Brucella specific antigen. IFNγ was measured in the supernatants (SN) from these assays by ELISA. Concurrent standard serological tests were carried out. The results indicate that the IFNγ assay is specifically able to distinguish Y. enterocolitica O:9 infection from a B. suis infection in experimentally infected mini-pigs. These results represent an improvement in diagnostic specificity compared to currently used serological tests. Thus suggesting that in a surveillance setting this test could be applied as a confirmatory test in the face of FPSR.
KeywordsBrucella B. suis IFNγ FPSR Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 Diagnosis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alton, G.G., Jones, L.M., Angus, R.D. and Verger, J.M., 1988. Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory, Paris: INRA, 42–47Google Scholar
- Castañeda, M. R., 1947. A practical method for routine blood cultures in brucellosis. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, New York, 64, 114–115Google Scholar
- Corbel M.J., 1985. Recent advances in the study of Brucella antigens and their serological cross-reactions. Veterinary Bulletin, 55, 927–942Google Scholar
- Kittelberger, R., Hilbink, F., Hansen, M.F., Penrose, M., De Lisle, G.W., Letesson, J.J., Garin-Bastuji, B., Searson, J., Fossati, C.A., Cloeckaert, A. and Schurig, G., 1995. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis. Veterinary Microbiology, 47, 257–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kittelberger, R., Hilbink, F., Hansen, M.F., Ross, G.P., Joyce, M.A., Fenwick, S., Heesemann, J., Wolf-Watz, H. and Nielsen, K., 1995. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants. Veterinary Microbiology, 47, 271–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kittelberger, R., Reichel, M.P., Joyce, M.A. and Staak, C., 1997. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. III. Specificity of the in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon test for bovine brucellosis diagnosis in experimentally Yersinia enterocolitica O:9-infected cattle. Veterinary Microbiology, 57, 361–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kittelberger, R., Bundesen, P.G., Cloeckaert, A., Greiser-Wilke, I. and Letesson, J.J., 1998. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections. Veterinary Microbiology, 60, 45–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McNally, A., Cheasty, Y.T., Fearnley, C., Dalziel, R.W., Paiba, G.A., Manning, G. and Newell, D.G., 2004. Comparison of the biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from pigs, cattle and sheep at slaughter and from humans with yersiniosis in Great Britain during 1999–2000. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 39, 103–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- OIE MANUAL of DIAGNOSTIC TESTS and VACCINES for TERRESTRIAL ANIMALS, FIFTH EDITION. (2004) Porcine Brucellosis, 2.6.2; 777–784Google Scholar