Calculating the uncertainty associated with log response ratios in plant–soil feedback studies
The strength and direction of plant–soil feedbacks are commonly estimated using log response ratios. Ratios have the benefit of being readily comparable across taxa and studies, but calculating the uncertainty associated with a ratio is not always straightforward. Many studies do not report estimates of uncertainty for feedback ratios despite this being central to interpreting the findings. We describe three ways to calculate the uncertainty associated with the mean log response ratio in plant–soil feedback studies (an analytical formula, bootstrapping, and model fitting), and show how these approaches produce comparable estimates for 95% confidence intervals around the mean. While the choice of method will depend on the experimental design of the study, we suggest that model fitting may be the most reliable and flexible approach. Presenting feedback ratios and their associated uncertainty in a consistent manner will allow clearer assessment of the findings of individual studies and facilitate cross-study comparisons, such as meta-analysis.
KeywordsPlant–soil feedback Log response ratio Uncertainty Bootstrapping Modelling uncertainty
This work was funded by Australian Research Council Grant DP150101839 to Richard Duncan and funding from the University of Canberra to Richard Duncan.
- Bauer JT, Blumenthal N, Miller AJ, Ferguson JK, Reynolds HL (2017) Effects of between-site variation in soil microbial communities and plant-soil feedbacks on the productivity and composition of plant communities. J Appl Ecol 54:1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy, statistical science. https://about.jstor.org/terms. Accessed 18 April 2019.
- Gomez-Aparicio, L., Dom Inguez-Begines, J., Kardol, P., M Avila, J. E., A, B. I. and Garc Ia, L. V (2017) Plant-soil feedbacks in declining forests: implications for species coexistence. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecy.1864. Accessed 18 April 2019.
- Hesterberg, T. (2014) Bootstrap with Examples, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06780
- Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. BioScience Narnia 51(5):341–352. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:lndats]2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shelby N, Hulme PE, van der Putten WH, McGinn KJ, Weser C, Duncan RP (2016) No difference in the competitive ability of introduced and native Trifolium provenances when grown with soil biota from their introduced and native ranges. AoB Plants. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1995) Biometry: the princples and practice of statistic in biological research (3rd) New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar