Plant Ecology

, Volume 220, Issue 12, pp 1101–1108 | Cite as

No evidence for early inbreeding depression in planted seedlings of Eucalyptus caesia, an anciently fragmented tree endemic on granite outcrops

  • Nicole BezemerEmail author
  • Siegfried L. Krauss
  • David G. Roberts


Selection against inbred progeny is a well-documented phenomenon in natural and experimental populations of trees with mixed mating systems. This inbreeding depression can be expressed at multiple life stages, including early seedling development. Eucalyptus caesia, a long-lived tree that is endemic to granite outcrops in south-west Australia, has an anciently fragmented population structure, low levels of heterozygosity and limited genetic interconnection between stands and small population sizes. To test whether purging of genetic load may have facilitated the persistence of E. caesia on its granite rock habitat, we assessed the early growth and survivorship of seedlings in a common garden trial. A total of 120 seedlings from eight maternal trees were planted in four plots at the study site. Seedling growth rate and survivorship were assessed over 26 months against familial background and level of individual heterozygosity. We found no significant variation in the early growth or survivorship of selfed or outcrossed seedlings, or between seedlings with low or high levels of individual heterozygosity. These results support the hypothesis that purging of genetic load may have reduced the negative impacts of inbreeding in seedlings of E. caesia.


Heterozygosity Inbreeding depression Ancient fragmentation Eucalyptus caesia 



We thank Chris and Sheina Murphy for their kindness, support and permission to plant seedlings on their property. Sheina helped plant the seedlings, and Chris prepared a first-class field lunch. We also thank Stephen D. Hopper for discussions that improved the manuscript and supervision of NB during the project. This project was partly funded by an Australian Research Council Grant (DP140103357) to SDH, SLK and RD Phillips and by a Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment—Equity Trustees Charitable Foundation and Wiley Fundamental Ecology Award from the Ecological Society of Australia to NB, who was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship at the University of Western Australia.


  1. Barrett LG, He T, Lamont BB, Krauss SL (2005) Temporal patterns of genetic variation across a 9-year-old aerial seed bank of the shrub Banksia hookeriana (Proteaceae). Mol Ecol 14:4169–4179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett S, Charlesworth D (1991) Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352:522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezemer N (2018) Wild seedlings of a tree endemic on granite outcrops show no evidence of inbreeding depression. Aust J Bot 66:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bezemer N, Krauss SL, Phillips RD, Roberts DG, Hopper SD (2016) Paternity analysis reveals wide pollen dispersal and high multiple paternity in a small isolated population of the bird-pollinated Eucalyptus caesia (Myrtaceae). Heredity 117:460–471PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezemer N, Krauss SL, Roberts DG, Hopper SD (2019a) Conservation of old individual trees and small populations is integral to maintain species' genetic diversity of a historically fragmented woody perennial. Mol Ecol 28:3339–3357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bezemer N, Hopper SD, Krauss SL, Phillips RD, Roberts DG (2019b) Primary pollinator exclusion has divergent consequences for pollen dispersal and mating in different populations of a bird-pollinated tree. Mol Ecol 00:1–16. Google Scholar
  7. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breed MF, Ottewell KM, Gardner MG, Marklund MHK, Stead MG, Harris JBC, Lowe AJ (2015) Mating system and early viability resistance to habitat fragmentation in a bird-pollinated eucalypt. Heredity 115:100–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butcher P, Williams E (2002) Variation in outcrossing rates and growth in Eucalyptus camaldulensis from the Petford Region, Queensland; evidence of outbreeding depression. Silvae Genet 51:6–12Google Scholar
  10. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 30:479–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne M, Elliott CP, Yates CJ, Coates DJ (2007) Extensive pollen dispersal in a bird-pollinated shrub, Calothamnus quadrifidus, in a fragmented landscape. Mol Ecol 16:1303–1314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne M, Hopper SD (2008) Granite outcrops as ancient islands in old landscapes: evidence from the phylogeography and population genetics of Eucalyptus caesia (Myrtaceae) in Western Australia. Biol J Linn Soc 93:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10:783–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa e Silva J., Hardner C., Tilyard P. and Potts B. (2011) The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus. Heredity 107:50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crnokrak P, Barrett SC (2002) Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347–2358PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardner C, Potts B (1995) Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet 44:46–54Google Scholar
  17. Hardner C, Tibbits W (1998) Inbreeding depression for growth, wood and fecundity traits in Eucalyptus nitens. For Genet 5:11–20Google Scholar
  18. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1997) Postdispersal selection following mixed mating in Eucalyptus regnans. Evolution 51:103–111PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hedrick PW, Hellsten U, Grattapaglia D (2016) Examining the cause of high inbreeding depression: analysis of whole-genome sequence data in 28 selfed progeny of Eucalyptus grandis. New Phytol 209:600–611PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopper SD (2009) OCBIL theory: towards an integrated understanding of the evolution, ecology and conservation of biodiversity on old, climatically buffered, infertile landscapes. Plant Soil 322:49–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopper SD, Campbell NA, Moran GF (1982) Eucalyptus caesia, a rare mallee of granite rocks from south-western Australia. In: Groves RH (ed) Species at risk. Research in Australia, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp 46–61Google Scholar
  22. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. James SH (2000) Genetic systems in the south-west flora: implications for conservation strategies for Australian plant species. Aust J Bot 48:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. James SH, Kennington WJ (1993) Selection against homozygotes and resource allocation in the mating system of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. Aust J Bot 41:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krauss SL, Hermanutz L, Hopper SD, Coates DJ (2007) Population-size effects on seeds and seedlings from fragmented eucalypt populations: implications for seed sourcing for ecological restoration. Aust J Bot 55:390–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladiges P.Y. 1997. Phylogenetic history and classification of eucalypts. Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 16–29.Google Scholar
  29. Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Molenberghs G, Verbeke G (2007) Likelihood ratio, score, and Wald tests in a constrained parameter space. Am Stat 61:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moran GF, Hopper SD (1983) Genetic diversity and the insular population structure of the rare granite rock species, Eucalyptus caesia Benth. Aust J Bot 31:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mullin TJ, Persson T, Abrahamsson S, Andersson GB (2019) Effects of inbreeding depression on seed production in Scots pine. Can J For Res. 49(7):854–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nickolas H, Harrison PA, Tilyard P, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2019) Inbreeding depression and differential maladaptation shape the fitness trajectory of two co-occurring Eucalyptus species. Ann For Sci 76:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poot P, Hopper SD, van Diggelen JM (2012) Exploring rock fissures: does a specialized root morphology explain endemism on granite outcrops? Ann Bot 110:291–300PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pound LM, Wallwork MA, Potts BM, Sedgley M (2003) Pollen tube growth and early ovule development following self-and cross-pollination in Eucalyptus nitens. Sex Plant Reprod 16:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pryor LD (1976) The biology of eucalypts. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
  40. Roberts DG, Ottewell KM, Whelan RJ, Ayre DJ (2014) Is the post-disturbance composition of a plant population determined by selection for outcrossed seedlings or by the composition of the seedbank? Heredity 112:409–414PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Rymer PD, Sandiford M, Harris SA, Billingham M, Boshier D (2015) Remnant Pachira quinata pasture trees have greater opportunities to self and suffer reduced reproductive success due to inbreeding depression. Heredity 115:115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sorensen FC (2001) Effect of population outcrossing rate on inbreeding depression in Pinus contorta var. murrayana seedlings. Scand J For Res 16:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steane DA, Conod N, Jones RC, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2006) A comparative analysis of population structure of a forest tree, Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae), using microsatellite markers and quantitative traits. Tree Genet Genom 2:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Etten ML, Tate JA, Anderson SH, Kelly D, Ladley JJ, Merrett MF, Peterson PG, Robertson AW (2015) The compounding effects of high pollen limitation, selfing rates and inbreeding depression leave a New Zealand tree with few viable offspring. Ann Bot 116:833–843PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wardell-Johnson G.W., Williams J.E., Hill K. and Cumming R. 1997. Evolutionary biogeography and contemporary distribution of eucalypts. Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 92–128.Google Scholar
  46. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, School of Agriculture and EnvironmentThe University of Western AustraliaAlbanyAustralia
  2. 2.Kings Park Science, Department of Biodiversity Conservation and AttractionsWest PerthAustralia
  3. 3.Biological Sciences, The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations