Plant Ecology

, Volume 220, Issue 10, pp 977–984 | Cite as

Rethinking soil water repellency and its management

  • Katinka X. RuthrofEmail author
  • Anna J. M. Hopkins
  • Melissa Danks
  • Graham O’Hara
  • Richard Bell
  • David Henry
  • Rachel Standish
  • Mark Tibbett
  • John Howieson
  • Treena Burgess
  • Richard Harper


Soil water repellency (SWR) is a widespread challenge to plant establishment and growth. Despite considerable research, it remains a recalcitrant problem for which few alleviation technologies or solutions have been developed. Previous research has focused on SWR as a problem to be overcome; however, it is an inherent feature of many native ecosystems where it contributes to ecosystem functions. Therefore, we propose a shift in the way SWR is perceived in agriculture and in ecological restoration, from a problem to be solved to an opportunity to be harnessed. A new focus on potential ecological benefits of SWR is particularly timely given increasing incidence, frequency and severity of hotter droughts in many regions of the world. Our new way of conceptualising SWR seeks to understand how SWR can be temporarily alleviated at a micro-scale to successfully establish plants, and then harnessed in the longer term and at larger spatial scales to enhance soil water storage to act as a “drought-proofing” tool for plant survival in water-limited soils. For this to occur, we suggest research focusing on the alignment of physico-chemical and microbial properties and dynamics of SWR and, based on this mechanistic understanding, create products and interventions to improve success of plant establishment in agriculture, restoration and conservation contexts. In this paper, we outline the rationale for a new way of conceptualising SWR, and the research priorities needed to fill critical knowledge gaps in order to harness the ecological benefits from managing SWR.


Drought Fertiliser Hydrophobicity Microbial activity Nonwetting soils Runoff 



The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by ECU Centre for Ecosystem Management, Edith Cowan University (ECU Industry Award and Athena Swan Kick-Start Science Prize) and Murdoch University. This work was partly undertaken under the Centre of Climate Change, Woodland and Forest Health, which is a partnership between private industry, community groups, Universities, and the Government of Western Australia. The authors would also like to thank Jodi Burgess for the graphic design (


  1. Berglund K, Persson L (1996) Water repellence of cultivated organic soils. Acta Agric Scand Sect B - Soil Plant Sci 46(3):145–152Google Scholar
  2. Bisdom EBA, Dekker LW, Schoute JFT (1993) Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma 56:105–118Google Scholar
  3. Blackwell PS (1993) Improving sustainable production from water repellent sands. West Aust J Agric 34:160–167Google Scholar
  4. Blackwell PS (2000) Management of water repellency in Australia, and risks associated with preferential flow, pesticide concentration and leaching. J Hydrol 231:384–395Google Scholar
  5. Bond RD (1964) The influence of the microflora on the physical properties of soils II. Aust J Soil Res 2:123–131Google Scholar
  6. Daniel NRR, Uddin SMM, Harper RJ, Henry DJ (2019) Soil water repellency: a molecular-level perspective of a global environmental phenomenon. Geoderma 338:56–66Google Scholar
  7. DeBano L (1981) Water repellent soils: a state-of-the-art. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Gen Tech Rep PSW 21:46Google Scholar
  8. DeBano LF (2000) The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a review. J Hydrol 231:195–206Google Scholar
  9. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Oostindie K, Boersma OH (1998) Effect of drying temperature on the severity of soil water repellency. Soil Sci 163:780–796Google Scholar
  10. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ (1994) How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resour Res 30:2507–2517Google Scholar
  11. Diehl D (2013) Soil water repellency: dynamics of heterogeneous surfaces. Colloids Surf A 432:8–18Google Scholar
  12. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (2000) Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydrogeomorphological significance. Earth-Sci Rev 51:33–65Google Scholar
  13. Doerr SH, Llewellyn CT, Douglas P, Morley CP, Mainwaring KA, Haskins C, Johnsey L, Ritsema CJ, Stagnitti F, Allinson G, Ferreira AJD, Keizer JJ, Ziogas AK, Diamantis J (2005) Extraction of compounds associated with water repellency in sandy soils of different origin. Aust J Soil Res 43:225–237Google Scholar
  14. Edwards TJ, Nutt BJ, Yates RJ, O'Hara GW, Van-Wyk BE, Howieson JG (2019) A ley-farming system for marginal lands based upon self-regenerating perennial pasture legume. Agron Sustain Dev 39:13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feeney DS (2004) Impact of fungi upon soil water relations PhD Thesis. University of Abertay Dundee, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  16. Feeney DS, Hallett PD, Rodger S, Bengough AG, White NA, Young IM (2006) Impact of fungal and bacterial biocides on microbial induced water repellency in arable soil. Geoderma 135:72–80Google Scholar
  17. Flematti G, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD (2004) A compound from smoke that promotes seed germination. Science 304:977Google Scholar
  18. Goebel MO, Bachmann J, Reichstein M, Janssens IA, Guggenberger G (2011) Soil water repellency and its implications for organic matter decomposition—is there a link to extreme climatic events? Glob Change Biol 17:2640–2656Google Scholar
  19. Hallett PD, Young IM (1999) Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates caused by substrate-induced microbial activity. Eur J Soil Sci 50:35–40Google Scholar
  20. Harper RJ, McKissock I, Gilkes RJ, Carter DJ, Blackwell PS (2000) A multivariate framework for interpreting the effects of soil properties, soil management and landuse on water repellency. J Hydrol 231:371–383Google Scholar
  21. Harper RJ, Sochacki SJ, Smettem KRJ, Robinson N (2014) Managing water in agricultural landscapes with short-rotation biomass plantations. GCB Bioenergy 6:544–555Google Scholar
  22. Hiller D, Berliner J (1974) Waterproofing surface-zone soil aggregates for water conservation. Soil Sci 118:131–135Google Scholar
  23. House MG (1991) Select committee enquiry into land conservation. Legislative Assembly, PerthGoogle Scholar
  24. Howieson JG, Yates RJ, Foster KJ, Real D, Besier RB (2008) Prospects for the future use of legumes. In: Dilworth Michael J, James Euan K, Sprent Janet I, Newton William E (eds) N-fixing leguminous symbiosis, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 363–394Google Scholar
  25. Imeson AC, Verstraten JM, van Mulligen EJ, Sevink J (1992) The effects of fire and water repellency on infiltration and runoff under Mediterranean type forest. CATENA 19(3–4):345–361Google Scholar
  26. Lin C, Chou W, Tsai J, Lin W (2006) Water repellency of Casuarina windbreaks (Casuarina equisetifolia Forst.) caused by fungi in central Taiwan. Ecol Eng 26:283–292Google Scholar
  27. Lowe M, Mathes F, Loke MH, McGrath G, Murphy DV, Leopold M (2019) Bacillus subtilis and surfactant amendments for the breakdown of soil water repellency in a sandy soil. Geoderma 244:108–118Google Scholar
  28. Lozano E, Jimenez-Pinilla P, Mataix-Solera J, Arcenegui V, Barcenas GM, Gonzalez-Perez JA, Garcia-Orenes F, Torres MP, Mataix-Beneyto J (2013) Biological and chemical factors controlling the patchy distribution of soil water repellency among plant species in a Mediterranean semiarid forest. Geoderma 207–208:212–220Google Scholar
  29. Madsen MD, Kostka SJ, Inouye AL, Zvirzdin DL (2012) Postfire restoration of soil hydrology and wildland vegetation using surfactant seed coating technology. Rangel Ecol Manag 65:253–259Google Scholar
  30. Madsen MD, Davies KW, Boyd CS, Kerby JD, Svejcar TJ (2016) Emerging seed enhancement technologies for overcoming barriers to restoration. Restor Ecol 24:S77–S84Google Scholar
  31. Mallik AU, Rahman AA (1985) Soil water repellency in regularly burned Calluna heathlands: comparison of three measuring techniques. J Environ Manag 20:207–218Google Scholar
  32. Mao J, Nierop KGJ, Dekker SC, Dekker LW, Chen B (2019) Understanding the mechanisms of soil water repellency from nanoscale to ecosystem scale: a review. J Soils Sediments 19:171–185Google Scholar
  33. McKissock I, Gilkes RJ, Harper RJ, Carter DJ (1998) Relationships of water repellency to soil properties for different spatial scales of study. Aust J Soil Res 36:495–507Google Scholar
  34. McKissock I, Walker EL, Gilkes RJ, Carter DJ (2000) The influence of clay type on reduction of water repellency by applied clays: a review of some WestAustralian work. J Hydrol 231–232:323–332Google Scholar
  35. Műller K, Deurer M (2011) Review of the remediation strategies for soil water repellency. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:208–221Google Scholar
  36. Rillig CM, Mardatin NF, Leifheit EF, Antunes PM (2010) Mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases soil water repellency and is sufficient to maintain water-stable soil aggregates. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1189–1191Google Scholar
  37. Ritz K (2007) The plate debate: cultivable communities have no utility in contemporary environmental microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 60:358–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Roper MM (2004) The isolation and characterisation of bacteria with the potential to degrade waxes that cause water repellency in sandy soils. Aust J Soil Res 42:427–434Google Scholar
  39. Roper MM (2005) Managing soils to enhance the potential for bioremediation of water repellency. Aust J Soil Res 43:803–810Google Scholar
  40. Roper MM (2006) Potential for remediation of water repellent soils by inoculation with wax-degrading bacteria in south-western Australia. Biol Bratisl 61(19):358–362Google Scholar
  41. Roper MM, Ward PR, Keulen AF, Hill JR (2013) Under no-tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency. Soil Tillage Res 126:143–150Google Scholar
  42. Roper MM, Davies SL, Blackwell PS, Hall DJM, Bakker DM, Jongepier R, Ward PR (2015) Management options for water-repellent soils in Australian dryland agriculture. Soil Res 53:786–806Google Scholar
  43. Ruthrof KX, Bader MKF, Matusick G, Jakob S, Hardy GEJ (2015) Promoting seedling physiological performance and early establishment in degraded Mediterranean-type ecosystems. New For 47:357–376Google Scholar
  44. Rye K, Smettem KRJ (2017) The effect of water repellent soil surface layers on preferential flow and bare soil evaporation. Geoderma 207–208:212–220Google Scholar
  45. Scott DF (1993) The hydrological effects of fire in South African mountain catchments. J Hydrol 150:409–432Google Scholar
  46. Spaccini R, Piccolo A, Conte P, Haberbauer G, Gerzabek MH (2002) Increased soil organic carbon sequestration through hydrophobic protection by humic substances. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1839–1851Google Scholar
  47. Tibbett M (2000) Roots, foraging and the exploitation of soil nutrient patches: the role of mycorrhizal symbiosis. Funct Ecol 14:397–399Google Scholar
  48. Uddin SMM, Daniel NRR, Harper RJ, Henry DJ (2017) Why do biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) derived from vegetation fire not induce soil water repellency? Biogeochemistry 134:147–161Google Scholar
  49. Walden LL, Harper RJ, Mendham DS, Henry DJ, Fontaine JB (2015) Eucalyptus reforestation induces soil water repellency. Soil Res 53:168–177Google Scholar
  50. Ward PR, Oades JM (1993) Effect of clay mineralogy and exchangeable cations on water repellency in clay-amended sandy soils. Aust J Soil Res 31:351–364Google Scholar
  51. Ward PR, Roper MM, Jongpier R, Fernandez MA (2013) Consistent plant residue removal causes decrease in minimum soil water content in a Mediterranean environment. Biologia 68:1128–1131Google Scholar
  52. Woche SK, Goebel MO, Kirkham MB, Horton R, Van DerPloeg RR, Bachmann J (2005) Contact angle of soils as affected by depth, texture and land management. Eur J Soil Sci 56:239–251Google Scholar
  53. Yeap SGH, Bell RW, Scanlan C, Harper RJ (2018) Topsoil water repellence increased early wheat growth and nutrition. In: Hulugalle N, Biswas T, Greene R, Bacon P (eds) Proceedings of the National Soils Conference, Canberra 18–23 November, 2018.Google Scholar
  54. Zheng W, Morris EK, Lehmann A, Rillig MC (2016) Interplay of soil water repellency, soil aggregation and organic carbon. A meta-analysis. Geoderma 283:39–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental and Conservation SciencesMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  2. 2.Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and AttractionsKensingtonAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Ecosystem ManagementEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia
  4. 4.Agricultural SciencesMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  5. 5.Chemistry and PhysicsMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  6. 6.School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentReading UniversityBerkshireUK

Personalised recommendations