Herbivory is poorly characterized in the endangered California sage scrub ecosystem, because previous studies were conducted only in winter and spring. To better understand vertebrate herbivore impacts, we first examined if and when vertebrate herbivores influence Artemisia californica seedling survivorship by examining differences in mortality between caged and uncaged seedlings. Then, we examined: (1) vertebrate herbivore preference of common sage scrub shrub species, and (2) which vertebrate species constitute important herbivores in the ecosystem. We found that mortality for uncaged A. californica seedlings was twice that of caged seedlings, and occurred in the summer and early fall, when previous studies in the system were not conducted. Short leaved shrubs, Artemisia californica and Eriogonum fasciculatum, were more susceptible to herbivory than broader leaved Salvia apiana and Eriodictyon trichocalyx. However, susceptibility likely depends on the herbivore assemblage, as the three main herbivore species [Sylvilagus audubonii (desert cottontail), Zonotrichia leucophrys (white-crowned sparrow; a bird, not a mammal), and Otospermophilus beecheyi (California gray squirrel)] all had different shrub preferences. Our results contrast with previous studies that suggests that native vertebrate herbivores facilitate shrub seedling survivorship by highlighting that late-season vertebrate herbivory may negatively affect shrub seedling survivorship. We demonstrate the complex but understudied role herbivores play in the sage scrub ecosystem, and highlight that further study of these key ecological interactions is warranted.
Mammal Bird Species interactions Plant community Top-down Preference
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank the Pomona College Biology Department and the Henry David Thoreau Foundation for funding.
Bartholomew B (1970) Bare zone between California shrub and grassland communities: the role of animals. Science 170:1210–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi T, Estrada L, Dowling AV, Su E, Leshchinskiy M, Calvalcanti ARO, Crane EJ III, Robins CR, Meyer WM III (2018) Carbon and nitrogen storage in the topsoils of Inceptisols and Mollisols under native sage scrub and non-native grasslands in southern California. Geoderma Reg 14:e00172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman JA, Willner GR (1978) Sylvilagus audubonii. Mamm Species 106:1–4Google Scholar
Riordan EC, Rundel PW (2014) Land use compounds habitat losses under projected climate change in a threatened California ecosystem. PLoS ONE 9:e86487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundel PW (2007) Sage scrub. In: Barbour M, Keeler-Wold T, Schoenherr AA (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 208–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staubus WJ, Boyd ES, Adams TA, Spear DM, Dipman MM, Meyer WM III (2015) Ant communities in native sage scrub, non-native grassland, and suburban habitats in Los Angeles County, USA: conservation implications. J Insect Conserv 19:669–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talluto MV, Suding KN (2008) Historical change in coastal sage scrub in southern California, USA in relation to fire frequency and air pollution. Landsc Ecol 23:803–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterton J, Cleland EE (2016) Trade-off between early emergence and herbivore susceptibility mediates exotic success in an experimental California plant community. Ecol Evol 6:8942–8953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman WE (1981) Factors influencing the distribution of species of Californian coastal sage scrub. Ecology 62:439–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler MM, Dipman MM, Adams TA, Runia AV, Robins CR, Meyer WM III (2016) Carbon and nitrogen storage in California sage scrub and non-native grasslands. J Arid Ecosyst 129:119–125Google Scholar