Advertisement

Modeling spatial distribution of plant species using autoregressive logistic regression method-based conjugate search direction

  • Hossen Piri Sahragard
  • Behrooz Keshtegar
  • Mohammad Ali Zare Chahouki
  • Zaher Mundher YaseenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Modeling plant habitat range distributions is critical for monitoring and restoring species in their natural habitat. The classical logistic regression (LR) model for plant habitat distribution has several drawbacks such as neglecting the effects of the important variables and sensitivity to non-correlation variables. In this paper, an autoregressive logistic regression (ALR)-based conjugate gradient training approach was proposed to improve the drawbacks of LR in predicting the presence and absence of spatial habitat distribution based on input attributes including soil gypsum amount (gyps), lime content, soil available moisture (AM), soil electrical conductivity (EC), clay, and gravel amounts in Poshtkouh rangelands of Yazd Province, Iran. The conjugate gradient approach to calibrate logit model is extended by an iterative formulation using a limited scalar factor and adaptive step size. The predicted results of the classical LR and ALR were validated for nine plant habitats based on several comparative error statistics. The results illustrated that different coefficients were obtained for LR and ALR models but the proposed ALR performed better than the LR in estimating the occurrence probability of plant species.

Keywords

Autoregressive logistic regression Plant habitat distribution Limited conjugate gradient method Modeling plant species 

References

  1. Abd El-Ghani MM, Amer WM (2003) Soil-vegetation relationships in a coastal desert plain of southern Sinai Egypt. J Arid Environ 55:607–628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(02)00318-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen SE (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological material. Blackwell, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22(1):42–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardestani EG, Tarkesh M, Bassiri M, Vahabi MR (2015) Potential habitat modeling for reintroduction of three native plant species in central Iran. J Arid Land 7(3):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augustin NH, Mugglestone MA, Buckland ST (1996) An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J Appl Ecol 33(2):339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bo YC, Song C, Wang JF, Li XW (2014) Using an autologistic regression model to identify spatial risk factors and spatial risk patterns of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in Mainland China. BMC Public Health 14(1):358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen G, Tu L, Chen G, Hu J, Han Z (2018) Effect of six years of nitrogen additions on soil chemistry in a subtropical Pleioblastus amarus forest Southwest China. J For Res 29(6):1657–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diop L, Bodian A, Djaman K, Yaseen ZM, Deo RC, El-shafie A, Brown LC (2018) The influence of climatic inputs on stream-flow pattern forecasting: case study of Upper Senegal River. Environ Earth Sci 77:182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7376-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubuis A, Pottier J, Rion V (2011) Predicting spatial patterns of plant species richness: a comparison of direct macro ecological and species stacking modeling approaches. Divers Distrib 17:1122–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00792.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elith J, Graham C (2009) Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elzwayie A, El-shafie A, Yaseen ZM, Afan HA, Allawi MF (2016) RBFNN-based model for heavy metal prediction for different climatic and pollution conditions. Neural Comput Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2174-7 Google Scholar
  12. Franklin J, Davis FW, Ikegami M, Syphard AD, Flint LE, Flint AL, Hannah L (2013) Modeling plant species distributions under future climates: how fine scale do climate projections need to be? Glob Change Biol 19:473–483.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham CH, Hijmans RJ (2006) A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:578–587.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00257.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guisan A, Weiss SB, Weiss AD (1999) GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecol 143:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guisan A, Edwards T.C., Hastie, T., (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model 157:89–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guisan A, Graham CH, Elith J, Huettmann F (2007) Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Divers Distrib 13:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hernandez PA, Franke I, Herzog SK, Pacheco V, Paniagua L, Quintana HL, Soto A, Swenson JJ, Tovar C, Valqui TH (2008) Predicting species distributions in poorly-studied landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 17:1353–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hosseini SZ, Kappas M, Zare Chahouki MA, Gerold G, Erasmi S, Rafiei Emam A (2013) Modeling potential habitats for Artemisia sieberi and Artemisia aucheri in Poshtkouh area, central Iran using the maximum entropy model and geostatistics. Ecol Inform 18:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ji X, Chen L, Zhang A (2017) Anchorage properties at the interface between soil and roots with branches. J For Res 28(1):83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones-Farrand DT, Fearer TM, Thogmartin WE, Iii FRT, Nelson MD, Tirpak JM (2011) Comparison of statistical and theoretical habitat models for conservation planning: the benefit of ensemble prediction. Ecol Appl 21:2269–2282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keshtegar B, Piri J, Kisi O (2016a) A nonlinear mathematical modeling of daily pan evaporation based on conjugate gradient method. Comput Electron Agric 127:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keshtegar B, Allawi MF, Afan HA, El-Shafie A (2016b) Optimized river stream-flow forecasting model utilizing high-order response surface method. Water Resour Manage 30:3899–3914.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1397-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keshtegar B, Hasanipanah M, Bakhshayeshi I, Sarafraz ME (2019) A novel nonlinear modeling for the prediction of blast-induced airblast using a modified conjugate FR method. Measurement 131:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khalasi Ahvazi L, Zare Chahouki MA, Ghorbannezhad F (2012) Comparing discriminant analysis, ecological niche factor analysis and logistic regression methods for geographic distribution modeling of Eurotia ceratoides (L.) C A. Mey. Rangel Sci 3:45–57Google Scholar
  26. Kikvidze Z, Pugnaire FI, Brooker RW et al (2005) Linking patterns and processes in alpine plant communities: a global study. Ecology 86:1395–1400.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kowsar R, Keshtegar B, Marey MA, Miyamoto A (2017) An autoregressive logistic model to predict the reciprocal effects of oviductal fluid components on in vitro spermophagy by neutrophils in cattle. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04841-z Google Scholar
  28. Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luoto M, Hjort J (2005) Downscaling of coarse-grained geomorphological data. Earth Surf Process Landf 33:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maalouf M, Trafalis TB (2011) Robust weighted kernel logistic regression in imbalanced and rare events data. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:168–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manel S, Dias JM, Buckton ST, Ormerod SJ (1999) Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: an illustration with Himalayan river birds. J Appl Ecol 36:734–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W (2009) Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modeling. Divers Distrib 15:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCune B (2006) Non-parametric habitat models with automatic interactions. J Veg Sci 17:819–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller J, Franklin J (2002) Modeling the distribution of four vegetation alliances using generalized linear models and classification trees with spatial dependence. Ecol Model 157:227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips SJ, R.P. Anderson., Schapire, R.E., (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piri Sahragard H, Ajorlo M (2017) A comparison of logistic regression and maximum entropy for distribution modeling of range plant species (A case study in rangelands of Western Taftan, Southeastern Iran). Turk J Bot 42:28–37.  https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1612-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piri Sahragard H, Zare Chahouki MA (2015) An evaluation of predictive habitat models performance of plant species in Hoze soltan rangelands of Qom province. Ecol Model 309–310:64–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piri Sahragard H, Ajorlo M, Karami P (2018) Modeling habitat suitability of range plant species using random forest method in arid mountainous rangelands. J Mt Sci 15(10):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4898-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pottier J, Dubuis A, Pellissier L et al (2013) The accuracy of plant assemblage prediction from species distribution models varies along environmental gradients. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:52–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00790.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saupe EE, Barve V, Myers CE, Soberón J, Barve N, Hensz CM, Peterson AT, Owens HL, Lira-Noriega A (2012) Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors. Ecol Model 237–238:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Segurado P, Araújo M (2004) An evaluation of methods for modeling species distributions. J Biogeogr 31:1555–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shabani F, Kumar L, Ahmadi M (2016) A comparison of absolute performance of different correlative and mechanistic species distribution models in an independent area. Ecol Evol 6:5973–5986.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tan CO, Özesmi U, Beklioglu M, Per E, Kurt B (2006) Predictive models in ecology: comparison of performances and assessment of applicability. Ecol Inform 1:195–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2006.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tarkesh M, Jetschke G (2012) Comparison of six correlative models in predictive vegetation mapping on a local scale. Environ Ecol Stat 19:437–457.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-012-0194-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Ferreira De Siqueira M, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, Van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang HH, Wonkka CL, Treglia ML, Grant WE, Smeins FE, Rogers WE (2015) Species distribution modeling for conservation of an endangered endemic orchid. AoB Plants.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv039 Google Scholar
  47. Wilson DJ, Western AW, Grayson RB (2004) Identifying and quantifying sources of variability in temporal and spatial soil moisture observations. Water Resour Res.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002306 Google Scholar
  48. Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, Guisan A (2008) Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib 14:763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu H, Huffer FRW (1997) Modeling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model. Environ Ecol Stat 4(1):31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang XQ, Kushwaha SPS, Saran S (2013) Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of medicinal plant, Justicia adhatoda L. in Lesser Himalayan foothills. Ecol Eng. 51:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zare Chahouki MA, Piri Sahragard H (2016) Maxent modeling for distribution of plant species habitats of rangelands (Iran). Pol J Ecol 64(4):453–467.  https://doi.org/10.3161/15052249PJE2016.64.4.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zare Chahouki MA, Azarnivand H, Jafari M, Tavili A (2010) Multivariate statistical methods as a tool for model-based prediction of vegetation types. Russ J Ecol 41:84–94.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413610010169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zare Chahouki MA, Khalasi Ahvazi L, Azarnivand H (2012) Comparison of three modeling approaches for predicting plant species distribution in mountainous scrub vegetation (Semnan rangelands, Iran). Pol J Ecol 60(2):277–289Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rangeland and Watershed Department, Water and Soil FacultyUniversity of ZabolZabolIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of ZabolZabolIran
  3. 3.Department of Rehabilitation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Natural Resources FacultyUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  4. 4.Sustainable Developments in Civil Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil EngineeringTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations